Helpful framework, much appreciated. I agree with the categorisation, though obviously I’m deeply into the Off Limits category, since there’s no scientific evidence for the existence of viruses, all vaccines have always been a useless and deliberate deception of the public and pandemic based control & assault systems have been actively rehearsed for at least 25 years on an international basis. I expect it’ll be used again, alongside other not-happening fear provoking deceptions such as climate change crises.
"Covid" can't be diagnosed clinically. Any old symptom will do--breathing or not, vomiting or ravenous hunger, shake ratttle 'n roll...or most often no symptoms at all. So how do "they" know when "we" are "infected"?
They concoct artificial cell cultures to "demonstrate" whatever they want to establish, which back in the day was "covid virus". But the Gold Standard ritual has been proven false, many times, in formal documented experiments and not just by virus sceptics. Every virus hunt--there are no exceptions--relies on cell culturing to "demonstrate" virus "isolation". That virus hunters seem averse to admitting this problem, may be because they have no other method to display what they want.
Now the Gold Standard, used in all V studies since the 1930s, is leaving center stage. New Modern and Powerful techniques of "molecular detection" are referenced as proof of this or that virus threat. Bood tests for antibodies, rapid anitgen and PCR testing--they all claim to detect virus presence by finding a molecule that is part of or connected to "the virus".
But no one has isolated any virus, including "covid". So no one could know what if any molecule is attached to or part of any imagined virus. So disagnosing covid (or AIDS, or measles or ebola)...it's all misconception. I am polite.
Those poor folks in Texas coming down with measles; maybe they've really got covid!
You're right...I was aware of that distinction when I wrote my comment, but I didn't care. None of the rules of their indoctrination campaign deserve respect. They don't respect reason. They're contemptuous of truth. They snear at justice.
I haven't been listing to you much since you joined the No Virus Cult.
Sam Bailey and others in the cult have shown malicious intent with their tactics; character assination being only one, of respective men and women that have helped the situation more than her calling anyone that believes in viruses vaccine pushing whores.
Virus vs no Virus in the new Flat Earth psyopp.
This article gives us a Tricotimy instead of a dicotimy.
Educational though that's why I shared it to me group on MeWe.
Still conviently avoiding provable causes like Graphene Oxide and 5G.
I've seen a full spectrum assault including Weaponized Genetic Encoding Programs, aka viruses.
From our POV, the article uses a trichotomy to show that a range of perspectives exist, versus the various "false binaries" our overlords continue to stroke. In general, our views fall into the "Off-Limits" column, but there are views that fall within and "between" each column.
In the thought experiment, a hypothetical cat in a closed box may be considered to be simultaneously both alive and dead while it is unobserved, as a result of its fate being linked to a random subatomic event that may or may not occur. This experiment, viewed this way, is described as a paradox.
The same is true of viruses. I enjoy Mike's contributions, even though I am like you, not fully persuaded of them: he plays a very useful hand in this card game.
There is a Japanese concept called “mu” for dealing with dichotomies. When faced with the choice of, “Do you want the right horn of the bull, or the left horn?” The answer is “mu.” Neither. Because your choice is to reject the dichotomy.
But I do want to reiterate that we are NOT anti-binary. We are anti FALSE binary and PRO beneficial binary where and when two options invites a range of perspectives and/or the 'answer' HAS to be one option or the other option.
Brilliant analysis. What this piece captures so well is that the entire virology narrative—far from being a scientific discourse—is a belief system enforced by false binaries and priestly edicts from credentialed "experts."
I explore this further in my Substack, Virology Isn’t a Lie—It’s a Religion, where I argue that most in the COVID cult weren’t consciously deceiving the public—they were true believers. The PCR priests said there was a virus, and so it must be true. The doctrine was circular, the rituals absurd, but the faith unshaken.
The real crime isn’t that they lied—it’s that they believed.
Superb analysis of the death game they played with us all. I was in the ‘no mask’/‘no lockdown’/‘no jab’/‘no need for any of this bs’ camp from about mid April 2020. By about Jan this year I am now firmly in the ‘viruses don’t exist’ camp (courtesy of Mike Yeadon). As for ‘climate change’…🤡
As I have never personally seen one, I am also a bit dubious - but there are 'things' that make people sick that exhibit certain common features - take shingles for an example. I mean it may be caused by a virus, or a bacteria, or a fungus: but whichever it is, it is most unpleasant.
On viruses, as Mike Yeadon emphasises: ‘You can’t prove a negative’. So we can’t say 100%.
But:
a) he is a PhD and has successfully worked in the this field. He has reviewed countless scientific studies going back over a century and can find no evidence that they have been proven to exist or that conditions like colds are contagious.
b)I totally trust him—after five years of listening to him and reading a lot of his output. He offers all his material for free (no paid subscriptions) and doesn’t take a penny from anyone for any contributions. Not even costs. And he has nothing to sell.
So I go with the sounder scientific hypothesis of there being no conclusive evidence. 😎
I go with this, Mike is a decent guy and has a huge wealth of expertise, but this is an insanely complex field and as a layman, when people mention things like Prions and Germs, bacteria and viruses, my eyes tend to glaze over a bit! Clearly we all have experience of nasty conditions like whooping cough - with a very distinctive presentation: as a small child in a cold house in Leeds in the late 1950's all four of us kids shared a bedroom (two metal bunk beds, four kids aged between 5 and 9) and we were all whoopin' in chorus! So, I tend to go along with the idea of a virus and transmission , even if it is only a paradigm, in the absence of any other reasonable explanation.
Exactly. Aristotle cursed Western thinking with Either/Or abstractions. (Burroughs).
Black/White is not the colour spectrum. Nor is Red/Blue of voting. It is not Nature's way, it it is not the Eastern way. False dichotomies rule our world - law, politics and philosophy, creating Heat rather than Light. This is useful to some.
Chaos is the CIA Way. Who are the WEF to ignore the voice of experience. They are smart enough to hide a simultaneous kaleidoscope of assaults under these apparent simplifications.
Huh? Black versus white describes existence. Either a thing exists or it does not exist. Let's see if we can figure out whether or not Jennie exists in the classroom on a particular day. Teacher calls out the roll: Johnny? here. Susie? Here. Randy? Here. Jennie...Jennie?...She's not here teacher, she's home sick...Teacher marks "Absent" next to Jennie on the roll.
Aristotle's Law of Indentity: A is A, which means a thing is what it is and is not what it is not.
A contradiction holds that a thing is what it is AND is not what it is at the same time and in the same respect.
The foregoing is considered by Post Moderns to be befuddled and unsophisticated. Virology is superstition for Post Moderns.
A masterful summary - thank you! I keep coming back to the idea of the creep of technocracy in modern societies. What reared its ugly head in the 'Covid emergency' has deep roots. Most people have been thoroughly conditioned not to rock the boat, or, perhaps more appropriately, not to see that the boat is slowly sinking. Those who dare to raise the possibility of "nefarious purposes" or even incompetence in the crew are thrown overboard. Maybe that's not a bad thing!
Love the chart! It lays out your logic -- and what I NOW believe is the truth -- via an easy-to-understand (and repeat) framework. 'Tis a great covid dumpster fire heuristic!
...one nuance I think worth mentioning. It is entirely possible, nay likely at least to me, that the covid shot was BOTH not needed, and also deadly, or at least generative of a wide range of harsh adverse reactions. One need not be (a dreaded) anti-vaxxer to take that position. (Vaccine adverse side effects are almost as typical as Pfizer successfully marketing their crap via the CDC!)
As such, the ostensible "out of bounds" position seems to omit some context.
To clarify the thrust of our article: We are not suggesting there are only three perspectives for each dimension identified. In fact, you'll see a couple of places where we footnote other articles where one or more of us discussed a range of possibilities.
The point is to show that it's a misleading, misdirective LIMITING of options to particular choices that results in a FALSE binary and keeps conversation well within the bounds of what the perpetrators are comfortable with.
Binaries themselves aren't bad, especially in a debate. (See opening paragraphs.)
Regarding the "COVID Shot" dimension - we purposely (and correctly, I think) said the false binary we named is controversial. Really, we could devise an entire table on "False Binaries of the COVID-19 Shot"!
There was a time when the binary was "the COVID Shot is safe and effective" vs "the COVID Shot is NOT safe and effective."
We've moved "beyond" that, as far as I can tell, and (in 2023-2024 especially) into a territory I think the Perps are still very happy with, i.e., making it the worst thing that has ever happened to the human body.
The shot is probably where the three authors of this article have the greatest difference of opinion among themselves - but that doesn't matter. What matters is that both Covidians and many "dissidents' shut out possibilities like the ones you're describing.
Our analysis in that section says there are many perspectives within Off-Limits that remain unspeakable and suppressed. Nothing we've said precludes "combos" or "mix and match".
A while back I came across a film clip of an adherent (by dress he was one of their 'leaders') of that long-lived cult-religion-race-nation explaining it was "their way" to produce 2 options to the non-cult-religion-race-nation that encapsulated dammed if you do, and dammed if you don't. Meanwhile, it was the path of the cult-religion-race-nation followers to eat, dance, live on the pickings so created. If someone can find that clip now I'd be surprised as the cult-religion-race-nation doesn't like to be exposed.
As a follow up to the cryptic Burroughs reference: "The Adding Machine" is a slim volume of essays containing many of the concepts of what he thought breeds the "Ugly Spirit".
I can believe the Agencies would have a whole department using his analyses.
Unfortunately I bought into the fear and got one shot that ruined my life. It was a terrifying nightmare, it’s just a nightmare now. Looking back I don’t know how I could have been so easily taken. Some of the nonsense was blatant like churches closed, strip joints open, was like an intentional joke on an unsuspecting and terrified population. Somebody must have had a real laugh over that one. Stoking division amongst the fearing population by painting bullseyes on the backs of those who didn’t obey by getting the shot. They were blamed for the continuation of the virus, the pandemic would have ended, they said , if it weren’t for them. That was dangerous to those people. A squeal on your neighbours hot line was set up if they had more than 4 people over. Only the essential services could go to work, people were legally stopped in their cars and had to prove they were an essential service going to work.
Madly looking for information on medical journals, I observed obsequious lauding of the shots which eventually alerted me to huge conflicts of interest. The fact there was no active, independent data collection on a shot that had never been tried on humans before, shocked me. Doctors were given no guidance at all, no push to fill out forms, nothing zippo. Injuries were rare or very rare, with no independent data collection whatsoever what evidence did they have to support that claim? Within 2 weeks of the 4th shot, 6 doctors in the GTA (Greater Toronto Area) died. Two days later the Toronto Star debunked the “misinformation”, by claiming their deaths had nothing to do with the shots. With no diagnostic tests how could the paper present that as evidence? When two family court judges ruled against the parent that wanted their kids vaccinated, because as they stated, there was no evidence before them to rule any other way, the Toronto Star smeared and ridiculed them.
I don’t believe this well oiled machine of deception could have possibly been constructed on the fly. One of the aims was to divide, which they’ve succeeded at. The end result besides deaths and injuries is the abject distrust of our institutions.
They've done the same thing with Epstein. Approved narrative: Epstein killed himself Fall back accepted narrative: Epstein was murdered by shadowy, unnamed villains. Unaccepted: Epstein was busted out and currently living in Israel.
"No matter what, Epstein very likely was used to coerce/strong-arm certain officials into going along with Operation COVID-19" as in "Nice wife and kids you've got there. Wouldn't want them to know about your time on the island..."
Helpful framework, much appreciated. I agree with the categorisation, though obviously I’m deeply into the Off Limits category, since there’s no scientific evidence for the existence of viruses, all vaccines have always been a useless and deliberate deception of the public and pandemic based control & assault systems have been actively rehearsed for at least 25 years on an international basis. I expect it’ll be used again, alongside other not-happening fear provoking deceptions such as climate change crises.
"Covid" can't be diagnosed clinically. Any old symptom will do--breathing or not, vomiting or ravenous hunger, shake ratttle 'n roll...or most often no symptoms at all. So how do "they" know when "we" are "infected"?
They concoct artificial cell cultures to "demonstrate" whatever they want to establish, which back in the day was "covid virus". But the Gold Standard ritual has been proven false, many times, in formal documented experiments and not just by virus sceptics. Every virus hunt--there are no exceptions--relies on cell culturing to "demonstrate" virus "isolation". That virus hunters seem averse to admitting this problem, may be because they have no other method to display what they want.
Now the Gold Standard, used in all V studies since the 1930s, is leaving center stage. New Modern and Powerful techniques of "molecular detection" are referenced as proof of this or that virus threat. Bood tests for antibodies, rapid anitgen and PCR testing--they all claim to detect virus presence by finding a molecule that is part of or connected to "the virus".
But no one has isolated any virus, including "covid". So no one could know what if any molecule is attached to or part of any imagined virus. So disagnosing covid (or AIDS, or measles or ebola)...it's all misconception. I am polite.
Those poor folks in Texas coming down with measles; maybe they've really got covid!
Apologies for being a stickler, but one of my "things" is language re: given names and distinctions between the "virus" and the "disease."
The former - whatever "it" is - was named SARS-CoV-2; the latter was christened COVID-19.
:)
Related: https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/is-there-any-possible-way-for-sars
You're right...I was aware of that distinction when I wrote my comment, but I didn't care. None of the rules of their indoctrination campaign deserve respect. They don't respect reason. They're contemptuous of truth. They snear at justice.
So you're all big pharma, bio defense shills carrying Fauci's water?
https://brownstone.org/articles/is-this-the-man-who-created-covid-19-in-faucis-us-lab/
RML even took a picture of their creation:
https://www.microscopeworld.com/p-4317-covid-19-under-the-microscope.aspx
Hi Mike.
I haven't been listing to you much since you joined the No Virus Cult.
Sam Bailey and others in the cult have shown malicious intent with their tactics; character assination being only one, of respective men and women that have helped the situation more than her calling anyone that believes in viruses vaccine pushing whores.
Virus vs no Virus in the new Flat Earth psyopp.
This article gives us a Tricotimy instead of a dicotimy.
Educational though that's why I shared it to me group on MeWe.
Still conviently avoiding provable causes like Graphene Oxide and 5G.
I've seen a full spectrum assault including Weaponized Genetic Encoding Programs, aka viruses.
Thanks for your time.
Thanks for sharing it.
From our POV, the article uses a trichotomy to show that a range of perspectives exist, versus the various "false binaries" our overlords continue to stroke. In general, our views fall into the "Off-Limits" column, but there are views that fall within and "between" each column.
Its a no go trying to "debate" with "viruses are a mental construct" folks.
Cholera outbreak in 1854 in London/broad st area.
Local brewery staff were drinking beer that had been created by boiling the water from the broad st system.
No Cholera.
Folks using the pump directly were getting cholera.
Pump shut off.
Cholera patients from that area go down.
Explained as "all a coincidence from drinking dirty water"
Dirty, as in bits of dirt kills people it seems.
You can`t make it up..
To actually believe that anyone can drink sewerage and not get sick because of "mental constructs" is insane but amusing.
Lets see the no virus/no bacteria crowd guzzle a few litres from the rivers around Calcutta...
Bonus points for the first person to tell me to read the book "Can you Catch a cold".
Lets conflate difficulty of transmission with NO transmission of "something".
In the thought experiment, a hypothetical cat in a closed box may be considered to be simultaneously both alive and dead while it is unobserved, as a result of its fate being linked to a random subatomic event that may or may not occur. This experiment, viewed this way, is described as a paradox.
The same is true of viruses. I enjoy Mike's contributions, even though I am like you, not fully persuaded of them: he plays a very useful hand in this card game.
There is a Japanese concept called “mu” for dealing with dichotomies. When faced with the choice of, “Do you want the right horn of the bull, or the left horn?” The answer is “mu.” Neither. Because your choice is to reject the dichotomy.
Or as we say in Britain: "When did you stop beating your wife"?
We say that here too: Logical Fallacies 101 :)
But I do want to reiterate that we are NOT anti-binary. We are anti FALSE binary and PRO beneficial binary where and when two options invites a range of perspectives and/or the 'answer' HAS to be one option or the other option.
Brilliant analysis. What this piece captures so well is that the entire virology narrative—far from being a scientific discourse—is a belief system enforced by false binaries and priestly edicts from credentialed "experts."
I explore this further in my Substack, Virology Isn’t a Lie—It’s a Religion, where I argue that most in the COVID cult weren’t consciously deceiving the public—they were true believers. The PCR priests said there was a virus, and so it must be true. The doctrine was circular, the rituals absurd, but the faith unshaken.
The real crime isn’t that they lied—it’s that they believed.
🔗 Read here: Virology Isn’t a Lie—It’s a Religion. https://turfseer.substack.com/p/virology-isnt-a-lieits-a-religion
I'm excited to find myself out of bounds on every single point listed here.
You are in good company.
Superb analysis of the death game they played with us all. I was in the ‘no mask’/‘no lockdown’/‘no jab’/‘no need for any of this bs’ camp from about mid April 2020. By about Jan this year I am now firmly in the ‘viruses don’t exist’ camp (courtesy of Mike Yeadon). As for ‘climate change’…🤡
As I have never personally seen one, I am also a bit dubious - but there are 'things' that make people sick that exhibit certain common features - take shingles for an example. I mean it may be caused by a virus, or a bacteria, or a fungus: but whichever it is, it is most unpleasant.
Quite, understood.
On viruses, as Mike Yeadon emphasises: ‘You can’t prove a negative’. So we can’t say 100%.
But:
a) he is a PhD and has successfully worked in the this field. He has reviewed countless scientific studies going back over a century and can find no evidence that they have been proven to exist or that conditions like colds are contagious.
b)I totally trust him—after five years of listening to him and reading a lot of his output. He offers all his material for free (no paid subscriptions) and doesn’t take a penny from anyone for any contributions. Not even costs. And he has nothing to sell.
So I go with the sounder scientific hypothesis of there being no conclusive evidence. 😎
I go with this, Mike is a decent guy and has a huge wealth of expertise, but this is an insanely complex field and as a layman, when people mention things like Prions and Germs, bacteria and viruses, my eyes tend to glaze over a bit! Clearly we all have experience of nasty conditions like whooping cough - with a very distinctive presentation: as a small child in a cold house in Leeds in the late 1950's all four of us kids shared a bedroom (two metal bunk beds, four kids aged between 5 and 9) and we were all whoopin' in chorus! So, I tend to go along with the idea of a virus and transmission , even if it is only a paradigm, in the absence of any other reasonable explanation.
👍🏻
Exactly. Aristotle cursed Western thinking with Either/Or abstractions. (Burroughs).
Black/White is not the colour spectrum. Nor is Red/Blue of voting. It is not Nature's way, it it is not the Eastern way. False dichotomies rule our world - law, politics and philosophy, creating Heat rather than Light. This is useful to some.
Chaos is the CIA Way. Who are the WEF to ignore the voice of experience. They are smart enough to hide a simultaneous kaleidoscope of assaults under these apparent simplifications.
Huh? Black versus white describes existence. Either a thing exists or it does not exist. Let's see if we can figure out whether or not Jennie exists in the classroom on a particular day. Teacher calls out the roll: Johnny? here. Susie? Here. Randy? Here. Jennie...Jennie?...She's not here teacher, she's home sick...Teacher marks "Absent" next to Jennie on the roll.
Aristotle's Law of Indentity: A is A, which means a thing is what it is and is not what it is not.
A contradiction holds that a thing is what it is AND is not what it is at the same time and in the same respect.
The foregoing is considered by Post Moderns to be befuddled and unsophisticated. Virology is superstition for Post Moderns.
You entirely miss my point.
sorry if I missed your point about the Aristotelian Curse of binary thought. Do you exist?
We have I think known about Aristotle and his LoI for 2000 years, though
I wasn't aware of Jennie, Susie, Randy and the teacher. Do we have the names of the rest of the class ?
No wonder my point was beyond you !
The way you frame this is brilliant. It shows that "Covid" was all about the narrative, and not at all about the Science. Thanks for this.
A masterful summary - thank you! I keep coming back to the idea of the creep of technocracy in modern societies. What reared its ugly head in the 'Covid emergency' has deep roots. Most people have been thoroughly conditioned not to rock the boat, or, perhaps more appropriately, not to see that the boat is slowly sinking. Those who dare to raise the possibility of "nefarious purposes" or even incompetence in the crew are thrown overboard. Maybe that's not a bad thing!
Thanks.
I daresay we are not in the boat but on solid ground, trying to coax people inland! Not as easy as one might think!
Love the chart! It lays out your logic -- and what I NOW believe is the truth -- via an easy-to-understand (and repeat) framework. 'Tis a great covid dumpster fire heuristic!
...one nuance I think worth mentioning. It is entirely possible, nay likely at least to me, that the covid shot was BOTH not needed, and also deadly, or at least generative of a wide range of harsh adverse reactions. One need not be (a dreaded) anti-vaxxer to take that position. (Vaccine adverse side effects are almost as typical as Pfizer successfully marketing their crap via the CDC!)
As such, the ostensible "out of bounds" position seems to omit some context.
Appreciate the feedback.
To clarify the thrust of our article: We are not suggesting there are only three perspectives for each dimension identified. In fact, you'll see a couple of places where we footnote other articles where one or more of us discussed a range of possibilities.
The point is to show that it's a misleading, misdirective LIMITING of options to particular choices that results in a FALSE binary and keeps conversation well within the bounds of what the perpetrators are comfortable with.
Binaries themselves aren't bad, especially in a debate. (See opening paragraphs.)
Transferring the idea to an entirely different context, an English teacher could set-up a class debate as "Romeo and Juliet were victims of fate" versus "Romeo and Juliet were agents of their own free will." That's a beneficial binary for fostering discussion and inviting a range of perspectives - including the two ends of the spectrum identified. (Yes, I am drawing on my past life here! https://www.ascd.org/el/articles/classroom-discourse-as-civil-discourse | https://www.edweek.org/teaching-learning/opinion-response-teachers-should-examine-biases-when-discussing-sensitive-topics/2016/11) :)
Regarding the "COVID Shot" dimension - we purposely (and correctly, I think) said the false binary we named is controversial. Really, we could devise an entire table on "False Binaries of the COVID-19 Shot"!
There was a time when the binary was "the COVID Shot is safe and effective" vs "the COVID Shot is NOT safe and effective."
We've moved "beyond" that, as far as I can tell, and (in 2023-2024 especially) into a territory I think the Perps are still very happy with, i.e., making it the worst thing that has ever happened to the human body.
The shot is probably where the three authors of this article have the greatest difference of opinion among themselves - but that doesn't matter. What matters is that both Covidians and many "dissidents' shut out possibilities like the ones you're describing.
Our analysis in that section says there are many perspectives within Off-Limits that remain unspeakable and suppressed. Nothing we've said precludes "combos" or "mix and match".
FWIW, my individual view on the COVID shot is articulated here https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/what-do-i-think-about-the-covid-shot and here
https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/the-covid-shot-further-thoughts-and
Hope that helps.
P.S. Pfizer is a marketer, but the "core crap" is BioNTech's. :)
Outstanding!
A while back I came across a film clip of an adherent (by dress he was one of their 'leaders') of that long-lived cult-religion-race-nation explaining it was "their way" to produce 2 options to the non-cult-religion-race-nation that encapsulated dammed if you do, and dammed if you don't. Meanwhile, it was the path of the cult-religion-race-nation followers to eat, dance, live on the pickings so created. If someone can find that clip now I'd be surprised as the cult-religion-race-nation doesn't like to be exposed.
As a follow up to the cryptic Burroughs reference: "The Adding Machine" is a slim volume of essays containing many of the concepts of what he thought breeds the "Ugly Spirit".
I can believe the Agencies would have a whole department using his analyses.
And ignoring his warnings.
Such as:
"You can break all the laws you want.
You only break a Law of Nature once."
You can try to break a law of nature but will not succeed. :)
Tidy, neat, persuasive.
Thank you!
Listen to Dr Sam Bailey and her book Virus Mania.
Unfortunately I bought into the fear and got one shot that ruined my life. It was a terrifying nightmare, it’s just a nightmare now. Looking back I don’t know how I could have been so easily taken. Some of the nonsense was blatant like churches closed, strip joints open, was like an intentional joke on an unsuspecting and terrified population. Somebody must have had a real laugh over that one. Stoking division amongst the fearing population by painting bullseyes on the backs of those who didn’t obey by getting the shot. They were blamed for the continuation of the virus, the pandemic would have ended, they said , if it weren’t for them. That was dangerous to those people. A squeal on your neighbours hot line was set up if they had more than 4 people over. Only the essential services could go to work, people were legally stopped in their cars and had to prove they were an essential service going to work.
Madly looking for information on medical journals, I observed obsequious lauding of the shots which eventually alerted me to huge conflicts of interest. The fact there was no active, independent data collection on a shot that had never been tried on humans before, shocked me. Doctors were given no guidance at all, no push to fill out forms, nothing zippo. Injuries were rare or very rare, with no independent data collection whatsoever what evidence did they have to support that claim? Within 2 weeks of the 4th shot, 6 doctors in the GTA (Greater Toronto Area) died. Two days later the Toronto Star debunked the “misinformation”, by claiming their deaths had nothing to do with the shots. With no diagnostic tests how could the paper present that as evidence? When two family court judges ruled against the parent that wanted their kids vaccinated, because as they stated, there was no evidence before them to rule any other way, the Toronto Star smeared and ridiculed them.
I don’t believe this well oiled machine of deception could have possibly been constructed on the fly. One of the aims was to divide, which they’ve succeeded at. The end result besides deaths and injuries is the abject distrust of our institutions.
They've done the same thing with Epstein. Approved narrative: Epstein killed himself Fall back accepted narrative: Epstein was murdered by shadowy, unnamed villains. Unaccepted: Epstein was busted out and currently living in Israel.
"No matter what, Epstein very likely was used to coerce/strong-arm certain officials into going along with Operation COVID-19" as in "Nice wife and kids you've got there. Wouldn't want them to know about your time on the island..."