Wood House 76

Wood House 76

Share this post

Wood House 76
Wood House 76
"Untested or Unquestioned Edicts"
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
J.B. Pritzker

"Untested or Unquestioned Edicts"

Appellate Court judge in Illinois uses his dissent to give a history lesson on the dangers of depending on "expert opinion"

Jessica Hockett's avatar
Jessica Hockett
May 05, 2022
∙ Paid
38

Share this post

Wood House 76
Wood House 76
"Untested or Unquestioned Edicts"
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
Share
woman holding sword statue during daytime

This is an excerpt from Justice Robert Steigmann’s dissenting opinion in Glass v. Department of Corrections, issued April 22nd. I agree with Steigmann that the majority erred in its interpretation of the Illinois Department of Health Act, and in its application of the Act to interpreting the Healthcare Right of Conscience Act.

The entire decision is wo…

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Jessica Hockett
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More