11 Comments
User's avatar
Pete Ross's avatar

"Scientists Say NIH Officials Told Them To Scrub mRNA References on Grants"

by Arthur Allen

March 16, 2025

https://kffhealthnews.org/news/article/nih-grants-mrna-vaccines-trump-administration-hhs-rfk/

Expand full comment
Jessica Hockett's avatar

So mRNA gets banned. Then what?

Expand full comment
Pete Ross's avatar

It was all fake jabs anyway. No such thing as "RNA injections". You can inject into your arm all the super duper non-hydrolyzable RNA you want but it's not gonna generate the corresponding glycoprotein. It's fake story that exposes the gullibility/greed of the medical voodoo establishment.

Expand full comment
Jessica Hockett's avatar

Shot composition is not my expertise

I am being more literal. If the shots get pulled tmrw, and mRNA is banned henceforth - both of which would be fantastic, of course - where does that leave the pandemic claims?

Expand full comment
Pete Ross's avatar

It was such a good jab that the virus went away. The jabs saved the world but not needed no more.

Anyway, the "RNA Platform" worked only that one time for covid 😏 It was a miracle jab.

Also, the virus mutated into less virulent and mixed with all the other circulating coronerviruses, so now they all indistinguishable from one another.

Down The Memory Hole.

"NIH Removes Fauci Mural"

https://www.medpagetoday.com/publichealthpolicy/healthpolicy/114680

Expand full comment
Jessica Hockett's avatar

"Pretending we're admitting things and punishing evildoers"

Expand full comment
Pete Ross's avatar

Time will tell.

Expand full comment
Dr Mike Yeadon's avatar

I agree that the claims made for the concoctions are exaggerated. I am not convinced that anyone made the full length non-natural “spike protein”.

However, they don’t need to. Synthesis of any non-self polypeptide, providing it’s long enough to become noticed as non-self will be sufficient to trigger autoimmune responses.

I don’t doubt that the lipid nano particle formulation is in itself toxic.

I definitely would rule out the possibility that some people did make enough non-self polypeptides in order to trigger autoimmune diseases. Much of the observed toxicity is consistent with this hypothesis.

I don’t pretend I / we know for sure how the injections were harmful.

We do know that the design intent was to harm recipients.

Expand full comment
Jessica Hockett's avatar

Regarding intent - which is difficult to prove absent confessions/whistleblowers, but about which I am perfectly fine speculating - can it at least be said there was/is depraved indifference, if not intent to harm?

I am, of course, biased toward my own ideas about motives, but I see no scenario that doesn't involve TPTB (at least the chief countries n the flu/disease surveillance/seasonal shot racket) covering up things that were occurring pre-2020.

https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/motive-for-pandemic-casualty-event

We don't see any leaders shaking in their boots, do we? On the contrary, they are happy as clams. Each new "revelation" fails to provoke any sense of shame. There are only so many explanations for that...

Expand full comment
Jonathan Engler's avatar

Aren’t you missing the word “not” after the 3rd word in the below?

“I definitely would rule out the possibility that some people did make enough non-self polypeptides in order to trigger autoimmune diseases. Much of the observed toxicity is consistent with this hypothesis.”

Expand full comment
Pete Ross's avatar

If there were a rise in "Turbo", the surgeons & histopathologists would certainly notice - they would be working longer hours.

And if the modified RNA could actually generate peptides by injection, there would be herds of cattle, sheep, pigs for industrial scale manufacturing of all kinds of exotic peptides & glycoproteins.

But could be that the synthetic lipids trigger OCD attacks, so they go back for boosters?

Expand full comment