Many of you are probably aware that a variety of studies found positive "covid tests" on stored samples from "pre-pandemic" times. A good example is this Italian study done in Lombardi. They found positive “covid tests” in 25% of stored samples from "pre-pandemic cases", a higher percentage than was found in the few samples they had between March 2020 to March 2021.
This group of researchers has been testing and storing oropharyngeal swabs for many years as part of a measles and rubella surveillance program.
Here is a key quote:
”“Molecular evidence for SARS-CoV-2 infection was found … with a positivity rate of 16.7% (2/12) for the pandemic cases and 25% (11/44) for the pre-pandemic cases.”
Yes, you read that correctly: a positivity rate of 25% for “pre-pandemic cases”, which was HIGHER than the 16.7% rate for “pandemic cases”.
Here is their description of the samples they examined:
"156 cases were investigated for SARS-CoV-2 infection. These included samples from 44 cases collected between August 2019 ... and the beginning of the pandemic in late February 2020 (pre-pandemic cases), samples from 12 cases collected between March 2020 and March 2021 (pandemic cases), and samples from 100 cases collected between August 2018 and July 2019 (control cohort). The small number of samples received during the pandemic period was due to lockdown measures."
Here is another enlightening quote from the study about a "strongly positive" case from September 2019::
"The earliest sample with evidence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA was from September 12, 2019, and the positive patient was also positive for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (IgG and IgM)."
And here is a quote in the abstract about samples before September 2019. Although they say there was no "strong evidence", this tacitly admits that they did have positive cases before then, but they were not considered "strongly positive":
"No strong evidence of infection was found in samples collected between August 2018 and July 2019 from 100 patients."
You probably did not know that your blood could be “strongly positive” or “weakly positive” on “covid tests” :-)
You bring up a great point about the funeral fee generated "Covid" deaths.
Many of you are probably aware that a variety of studies found positive "covid tests" on stored samples from "pre-pandemic" times. A good example is this Italian study done in Lombardi. They found positive “covid tests” in 25% of stored samples from "pre-pandemic cases", a higher percentage than was found in the few samples they had between March 2020 to March 2021.
This group of researchers has been testing and storing oropharyngeal swabs for many years as part of a measles and rubella surveillance program.
Here is a key quote:
”“Molecular evidence for SARS-CoV-2 infection was found … with a positivity rate of 16.7% (2/12) for the pandemic cases and 25% (11/44) for the pre-pandemic cases.”
Yes, you read that correctly: a positivity rate of 25% for “pre-pandemic cases”, which was HIGHER than the 16.7% rate for “pandemic cases”.
Here is their description of the samples they examined:
"156 cases were investigated for SARS-CoV-2 infection. These included samples from 44 cases collected between August 2019 ... and the beginning of the pandemic in late February 2020 (pre-pandemic cases), samples from 12 cases collected between March 2020 and March 2021 (pandemic cases), and samples from 100 cases collected between August 2018 and July 2019 (control cohort). The small number of samples received during the pandemic period was due to lockdown measures."
Here is another enlightening quote from the study about a "strongly positive" case from September 2019::
"The earliest sample with evidence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA was from September 12, 2019, and the positive patient was also positive for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (IgG and IgM)."
And here is a quote in the abstract about samples before September 2019. Although they say there was no "strong evidence", this tacitly admits that they did have positive cases before then, but they were not considered "strongly positive":
"No strong evidence of infection was found in samples collected between August 2018 and July 2019 from 100 patients."
You probably did not know that your blood could be “strongly positive” or “weakly positive” on “covid tests” :-)
Reference:
Amendola et al (2022). Molecular evidence for SARS-CoV-2 in samples collected from patients with morbilliform eruptions since late 2019 in Lombardy, northern Italy https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013935122013068