COVID Origins Ping-Pong
This is stupid and exhausting
Is it just me, or we are caught in a game of COVID Origins ping-pong?
China! US! China! US! (No, Ukraine!)
A new white paper from China reportedly ‘debunks’ the lab leak theory and points to the U.S. as the country that birthed COVID-19.
This is truly stupid - and exhausting.
Unless it has an undisclosed meaning, COVID-19 could not have come from anyone’s lab, because it’s the name the WHO gave to a fraudulent disease. Whatever SARS-CoV-2 is, it’s not an entity that transmits from human to human or multiplies and “spreads” in the air or via jet stream.
The Neverending Story: Lab Leak Edition does not become more believable with a change of setting. Debating which country "it" came from is a distraction from the fact that authorities around the world never had a scientific or medical basis for claiming a novel coronavirus was suddenly circumnavigating the globe. Testing helped create the illusion.
The blame-shifting serves both sides of a false binary, of course. It’s also a pretext for war and further empowers the pandemic/bioterrorism preparedness industries.
'Dissident' views supportive of "manmade spreading virus" - regardless of how benign “it” is presumed to have been - are egging on the players when they should be calling out the game as a complete farce.
As X user @WllmTell put it, “the lab leak theory perpetuates this strange belief in sci-fi. Too much sci-fi being taken as fact (or taken as an inevitable future) these days.”
I couldn’t agree more. Only in a world easily misled by Hollywood scriptwriters do people (including scientists and medical doctors) believe in "scary super-spreading thing from somewhere" while insisting that co-ordinated data manipulation of the ilk manifested in Bergamo and New York City’s death curves, for example, is impossible.
In other related news, RFK, Jr’s HHS and Jay Bhattacharya’s NIH announced the launch of a “next-generation universal vaccine platform for pandemic-prone viruses” — effectively, more countermeasures for fake emergencies.1
From the press release:
This initiative represents a decisive shift toward transparency, effectiveness, and comprehensive preparedness, funding the NIH’s in-house development of universal influenza and coronavirus vaccines, including candidates BPL-1357 and BPL-24910. These vaccines aim to provide broad-spectrum protection against multiple strains of pandemic-prone viruses such as H5N1 avian influenza and coronaviruses including SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV-1, and MERS-CoV.
“Our commitment is clear: every innovation in vaccine development must be grounded in gold standard science and transparency, and subjected to the highest standards of safety and efficacy testing,” said HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
The program realigns BARDA’s operations with its statutory mission under the Public Health Service Act—to prepare for all influenza viral threats, not just those currently circulating.
“Generation Gold Standard is a paradigm shift,” said NIH Director Dr. Jay Bhattacharya. “It extends vaccine protection beyond strain-specific limits and prepares for flu viral threats – not just today’s, but tomorrow’s as well – using traditional vaccine technology brought into the 21st century.”
Because I believe Operation COVID-19 was, in part, an effort to “save” the flu shot from harms it had been afflicting - and preserve decades of lies about respiratory illness - I can’t say I’m surprised.2
The push toward (what I’ve called) One Shot to Rule Them All is moving full steam ahead as planned.
Bhattacharya’s background includes flu shot research, just like his Great Barrington Declaration co-authors Martin Kuldorff and Sunetra Gupta, so it appears he was a ‘good’ choice for some of the Trump administration’s ‘health’ goals.
At this point, I'm not seeing how opposing the COVID shot and saying the ‘spreading manmade virus’ - or spreading ‘emergent-from-nature virus’ - wasn't as deadly as claimed attacks the core lies or helps dismantle the pandemic narrative as a whole. (Of course, the latter isn’t something Bhattacharya wants to do anyway, as he told
in no uncertain terms last year…)The bottom line is this: Actions were taken to stage a non-existent threat, and decisions are clearly being made to prevent the truth about what really occurred and why from being disclosed.
If there’s a ping-pong match worth playing and watching, it’s not China versus U.S.
It’s We the People of the World versus They the Liars and Protectors of the Lies.
UPDATE: Here’s the report. No references, footnotes, or links. Seems legit! 🙄
In a comment below, Elizabeth Hart observed that others have used a “ping-pong” metaphor to characterize the restricted back-and-forth about “COVID” origins.
The irony here: "Our commitment is clear: every innovation in vaccine development must be grounded in gold standard science and transparency, and subjected to the highest standards of safety and efficacy testing,” said HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr." is that if "gold standard science" is really employed, a vaccine will never be approved. 4D chess ;-)?
Remember: "engineering a pandemic-causing novel deadly virus that can sneak out of a lab and wreak global havoc is easy but coordinated data fraud is entirely implausible!" Same folks probably buy a few extra lottery tickets every day just to "improve their odds."
I have a glimmer of hope that the flu vaccine will come under scrutiny because a new study found “negative efficacy” for this past years flu shot. The study was reviewed on CHD’s Defender newsletter and I’ll put a link at the end. This means that people who got the flu vaccine were MORE likely to “get the flu” and, according to standard virology, MORE likely to spread the flu. This is very similar to the negative efficacy of the “covid vaccines” and the new study is from the Cleveland Clinic who also published one of the main “covid vaccine” studies, using their over 50,000 employees as study subjects. Their covid vaccine study found that after a single dose the risk nearly doubled, after two doses it more than doubled, after three doses it nearly tripled, and after four doses it was well over triple. In the new flu vaccine study the increase was more modest: a 27% increased chance of “testing positive for the flu”, but still a disaster for the flu vaccine narrative. The Cleveland Clinic showed a lot of courage publishing these two studies, and I wonder what the lead authors would say in private? Maybe they even suspect that commonly used PCR tests cannot actually tell you anything useful about a person’s health! Appreciating the absurdity of the whole thing helps me cope :-). Here is the link.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/flu-shots-27-percent-higher-risk-influenza-2024-2025-season/