The irony here: "Our commitment is clear: every innovation in vaccine development must be grounded in gold standard science and transparency, and subjected to the highest standards of safety and efficacy testing,” said HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr." is that if "gold standard science" is really employed, a vaccine will never be approved. 4D chess ;-)?
Remember: "engineering a pandemic-causing novel deadly virus that can sneak out of a lab and wreak global havoc is easy but coordinated data fraud is entirely implausible!" Same folks probably buy a few extra lottery tickets every day just to "improve their odds."
Yes, I considered that re: the gold standard part, and while I am willing to entertain all possibilities, I have zero confidence in the ability of publicly-funded anything to adhere to a gold standard of any kind - especially where tremendous liabilities are involved AND where an enterprise is rooted in faulty assumptions in the first place.
As for Bhattacharya, he won't even revisit the GBD, so I'm not seeing how he's going to be willing to publicly consider the possibility that flu and flu shots are a massive racket that helped lay the groundwork for Operation COVID.
Well seeing as shills like Osterholm and Offit were out today crying to the media that placebo-controlled vax trials “threatened the existence of coronavirus vaccines” (Osterholm hilariously telling the truth for once but not for the right reason) and will result in “the gradual dissolution of the vax infrastructure in this country” I think the golden standard might do some serious damage to the vax grift gravy train. These guys are confessing to the crimes but dont realize it.
I have a glimmer of hope that the flu vaccine will come under scrutiny because a new study found “negative efficacy” for this past years flu shot. The study was reviewed on CHD’s Defender newsletter and I’ll put a link at the end. This means that people who got the flu vaccine were MORE likely to “get the flu” and, according to standard virology, MORE likely to spread the flu. This is very similar to the negative efficacy of the “covid vaccines” and the new study is from the Cleveland Clinic who also published one of the main “covid vaccine” studies, using their over 50,000 employees as study subjects. Their covid vaccine study found that after a single dose the risk nearly doubled, after two doses it more than doubled, after three doses it nearly tripled, and after four doses it was well over triple. In the new flu vaccine study the increase was more modest: a 27% increased chance of “testing positive for the flu”, but still a disaster for the flu vaccine narrative. The Cleveland Clinic showed a lot of courage publishing these two studies, and I wonder what the lead authors would say in private? Maybe they even suspect that commonly used PCR tests cannot actually tell you anything useful about a person’s health! Appreciating the absurdity of the whole thing helps me cope :-). Here is the link.
Re: "It’s also a pretext for war and further empowers the pandemic/bioterrorism preparedness industries."
How to disempower the pandemic/bioterrorism preparedness industries?
Stop the vaccine mandates.
That's what caught so many people during the 'Covid' debacle, and also for years prior in countries that impose mandates for other vaccines.
There should never have been vaccine mandates, they violate valid voluntary informed consent, which the vaccinating practitioners are obligated to obtain before they administer the vaccine intervention.
This is the massive scandal...
There is NO VALID CONSENT for COVID-19 vaccination, or any vaccination that has been administered under mis/disinformation, aka lies, from 'the authorities', and under pressure, coercion, manipulation and MANDATES.
All those billions of people injected around the world...with NO VALID CONSENT.
It's a massive scandal.
And who is responsible?
Of course those who penetrated the skin with the needle without valid consent.
But why did they do this?
They were caught in a hierarchy of 'regulators' and medical colleges and associations, and governments and bureaucrats, the research and university sector, and the WHO, and public private partnerships, and the mainstream media, and even the churches.
Our entire system has been captured to facilitate vaccination, imposed upon the population under duress.
So there is NO VALID CONSENT.
Get this massive scandal understood, and the various protagonists pursued for accountability, and the pandemic/bioterrorism preparedness industries are finished.
As you say yourself Mike: "Truly informed consent as I’ve just outlined would result in very low uptake."
That's exactly my point!!!!
The information that is promoted by 'the authorities' about disease threats is dire, fear-mongering propaganda, aka lies, to drive people to submit to vaccination, as we've seen clearly with 'Covid'.
But despite the fear-mongering, it seems they still have to coerce/mandate people to submit to the intervention, because many people would not make their own free choice to submit to vaccination.
It's about challenging the 'information' Mike, and the compulsion to vaccinate.
Jessica has set up another thread about this, initiated from our comments on this post - do you want to come and join us over there? See: 'There are no genuine vaccines' Hart, Hockett, Yeadon: https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/there-are-no-genuine-vaccines
Raina MacIntyre, Australia's 'go to expert' during Covid, used it in a tweet in March 2023: "It's a game of ping pong. The push-pull of narrative and counter-narrative that is so common in science."
Nice. Had not previously seen/heard the metaphor WRT this farce, but I love when different people independently arrive at similar/the same analogies as the result of observing the same things.
Says much about shared human experiences and the way we are wired to think.
Will add those uses you provided to my article as a post-pub amendment in the a.m.
"The CIA has also stated that it believes that a lab leak in China was more likely to have caused the pandemic than natural causes."
Then quotes the CIA email:
"'The CIA assesses with low confidence that a research-related origin of the Covid-19 pandemic is more likely than a natural origin based on the available body of reporting,' a spokesman said earlier this year."
Words not in the CIA's statement: Lab, leak, China
The irony here: "Our commitment is clear: every innovation in vaccine development must be grounded in gold standard science and transparency, and subjected to the highest standards of safety and efficacy testing,” said HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr." is that if "gold standard science" is really employed, a vaccine will never be approved. 4D chess ;-)?
Remember: "engineering a pandemic-causing novel deadly virus that can sneak out of a lab and wreak global havoc is easy but coordinated data fraud is entirely implausible!" Same folks probably buy a few extra lottery tickets every day just to "improve their odds."
Yes, I considered that re: the gold standard part, and while I am willing to entertain all possibilities, I have zero confidence in the ability of publicly-funded anything to adhere to a gold standard of any kind - especially where tremendous liabilities are involved AND where an enterprise is rooted in faulty assumptions in the first place.
As for Bhattacharya, he won't even revisit the GBD, so I'm not seeing how he's going to be willing to publicly consider the possibility that flu and flu shots are a massive racket that helped lay the groundwork for Operation COVID.
Well seeing as shills like Osterholm and Offit were out today crying to the media that placebo-controlled vax trials “threatened the existence of coronavirus vaccines” (Osterholm hilariously telling the truth for once but not for the right reason) and will result in “the gradual dissolution of the vax infrastructure in this country” I think the golden standard might do some serious damage to the vax grift gravy train. These guys are confessing to the crimes but dont realize it.
Have there ever been placebo-controlled trials of the seasonal flu shot?
Do we really think Jay Bhattacharya is going to do an about-face on his entire record? (Great if he does, but I'm not seeing that happening.)
Do we need trials for the Commander-in-Chief to do away with the flu shot mandate for military today by 5 pm?
I have a glimmer of hope that the flu vaccine will come under scrutiny because a new study found “negative efficacy” for this past years flu shot. The study was reviewed on CHD’s Defender newsletter and I’ll put a link at the end. This means that people who got the flu vaccine were MORE likely to “get the flu” and, according to standard virology, MORE likely to spread the flu. This is very similar to the negative efficacy of the “covid vaccines” and the new study is from the Cleveland Clinic who also published one of the main “covid vaccine” studies, using their over 50,000 employees as study subjects. Their covid vaccine study found that after a single dose the risk nearly doubled, after two doses it more than doubled, after three doses it nearly tripled, and after four doses it was well over triple. In the new flu vaccine study the increase was more modest: a 27% increased chance of “testing positive for the flu”, but still a disaster for the flu vaccine narrative. The Cleveland Clinic showed a lot of courage publishing these two studies, and I wonder what the lead authors would say in private? Maybe they even suspect that commonly used PCR tests cannot actually tell you anything useful about a person’s health! Appreciating the absurdity of the whole thing helps me cope :-). Here is the link.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/flu-shots-27-percent-higher-risk-influenza-2024-2025-season/
Thanks, Matt. You're reminding me that I need to comment on that study. May do so today
Re: "It’s also a pretext for war and further empowers the pandemic/bioterrorism preparedness industries."
How to disempower the pandemic/bioterrorism preparedness industries?
Stop the vaccine mandates.
That's what caught so many people during the 'Covid' debacle, and also for years prior in countries that impose mandates for other vaccines.
There should never have been vaccine mandates, they violate valid voluntary informed consent, which the vaccinating practitioners are obligated to obtain before they administer the vaccine intervention.
This is the massive scandal...
There is NO VALID CONSENT for COVID-19 vaccination, or any vaccination that has been administered under mis/disinformation, aka lies, from 'the authorities', and under pressure, coercion, manipulation and MANDATES.
All those billions of people injected around the world...with NO VALID CONSENT.
It's a massive scandal.
And who is responsible?
Of course those who penetrated the skin with the needle without valid consent.
But why did they do this?
They were caught in a hierarchy of 'regulators' and medical colleges and associations, and governments and bureaucrats, the research and university sector, and the WHO, and public private partnerships, and the mainstream media, and even the churches.
Our entire system has been captured to facilitate vaccination, imposed upon the population under duress.
So there is NO VALID CONSENT.
Get this massive scandal understood, and the various protagonists pursued for accountability, and the pandemic/bioterrorism preparedness industries are finished.
There is no valid anything.
Only lies.
There are no genuine vaccines.
They’re fraudulent, unnecessary, wholly ineffective and often deliberately injurious.
In such a setting they must not even be offered to people or animals.
Truly informed consent as I’ve just outlined would result in very low uptake.
But we’d never get within a country mile of properly informed status.
Obviously I demand informed consent but given the above, the concept (of informed consent to vaccination) is as dust.
Right.
Being asked to consent to a harmful or unnecessary product or procedure is immoral.
So, in that regard, "informed consent" is a halfway point ar which I am not willing to meet the Enemy.
"Don't compromise. Compromise is a language of the Devil." -Chariots of Fire
As you say yourself Mike: "Truly informed consent as I’ve just outlined would result in very low uptake."
That's exactly my point!!!!
The information that is promoted by 'the authorities' about disease threats is dire, fear-mongering propaganda, aka lies, to drive people to submit to vaccination, as we've seen clearly with 'Covid'.
But despite the fear-mongering, it seems they still have to coerce/mandate people to submit to the intervention, because many people would not make their own free choice to submit to vaccination.
It's about challenging the 'information' Mike, and the compulsion to vaccinate.
Jessica has set up another thread about this, initiated from our comments on this post - do you want to come and join us over there? See: 'There are no genuine vaccines' Hart, Hockett, Yeadon: https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/there-are-no-genuine-vaccines
Speaking of the 'ping pong' analogy...
Raina MacIntyre, Australia's 'go to expert' during Covid, used it in a tweet in March 2023: "It's a game of ping pong. The push-pull of narrative and counter-narrative that is so common in science."
https://x.com/Globalbiosec/status/1638297752575819776
Raina MacIntyre...who was involved in Pacific Eclipse, and her post-Covid book Dark Winter...
She is a player in the Covid theatre who must be subject to scrutiny...
See for example the @democracymanifest post: “It’s a game of ping pong”: the ‘origins of COVID’: https://democracymanifest.substack.com/p/its-a-game-of-ping-pong-the-origins
Nice. Had not previously seen/heard the metaphor WRT this farce, but I love when different people independently arrive at similar/the same analogies as the result of observing the same things.
Says much about shared human experiences and the way we are wired to think.
Will add those uses you provided to my article as a post-pub amendment in the a.m.
Thanks, Elizabeth
See the ‘lab leak’ story planted in this article.
They are definitely trying to embed this in people’s mind in an attempt to justify the ludicrous response.
Children rescued from four-year Covid lockdown in ‘horror house’
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/gift/393461d1ca03262e
Note how stupid The Telegraph is:
Journalist writes:
"The CIA has also stated that it believes that a lab leak in China was more likely to have caused the pandemic than natural causes."
Then quotes the CIA email:
"'The CIA assesses with low confidence that a research-related origin of the Covid-19 pandemic is more likely than a natural origin based on the available body of reporting,' a spokesman said earlier this year."
Words not in the CIA's statement: Lab, leak, China
https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/follow-up-cia-assessment-of-covid
"Pandemic-prone viruses." Lol. Like the one the CDC says is 99.998% survivable? Pandemic-prone like that?
The only valid answer to these people has always been, "Don't fucking tell me what to do."
And oh, by the way: You know how many people died *worldwide* from SARS 1.0? 787. "Pandemic prone." Hey, HHS: Kiss my white Yankee ass.
They better sort out this phoney baloney 'flying virus' paradigm before they train The Ai Machine to diagnose humans.
🧐
AI diagnostics is already a thing
Huh.
In that case - call the police!