I have more to say than this but I will briefly mention that nature agrees with the good Dr!
I’ve seen this in livestock over and over. I’ve seen it in humans via family living close together.
You do not see a systematic “spread” as Hollywood and public health want you to think.
In fact you generally see quite the opposite. Nearly Always an animal or human get sick not just from some mysterious virus but a combination of stressors. That may include genetic and obviously environmental.
Dr. Y’s hypothesis about what influenza is, is interesting. Books like “Can you catch a cold?” give ample demonstration of not only the failure of experiments to produce sick-to-well disease transmission, but that alternative sounder explanations were tossed aside after a multi decade debate.
Just like now, the powerful were able to figure out which narrative they could weaponize and exploit.
Dr. Yeadon’s work has also appeared a lot on Lioness of Judah stack.
Jamie Andrews and associates have made major strides not just in pointing out the logical fallacies of virology but are conducting experiments that explicitly falsify it.
Thank you, Jessica. I’m honoured that you took the time to share my thoughts and sources.
Six years ago, I didn’t think any of these things. They’re not my work, either. I’ve pieced together a new understanding from the work of many other people & begun to build upon a better foundation.
I’ve very often been accused of scaremongering or of hyperbolic thinking.
I’m not interested in mounting a defence. Who cares, anyway?
I was very much a “normie” until early 2020. Weird things began to happen. People I knew were appearing on TV, saying things I was sure weren’t true and that I was pretty sure that the speakers knew weren’t true. My mind was on high alert, because nothing like this had ever happened in my lifetime.
The first time I heard talk of “lockdowns”, I confided to my wife that I thought that a group of people, operating above the level of nation, were in the process of a coup d’etat of the world. I had no idea who the perpetrators were or why they were doing it. But multiple countries were simultaneously doing the same absurd & frightening things. I quickly read half a dozen countries’ public health emergency plans. These recommended that sick people stayed home and that everyone washed their hands more often than usual. Where more authoritarian measures were mentioned in these plans, it was explicitly to exclude any of them. WHO had on their website a similar document & again, it explicitly excluded things like quarantining or mass testing the healthy, masking, school closures or border restrictions.
As we know, all of that old planning was thrown overboard simultaneously and dystopian measures were imposed.
At this point, in late March 2020, my wife later reported that I was pacing around the house and going up & down stairs, muttering under my breath, repeatedly, that “We are in so much trouble).
I kept casting around, trying to work out why all this was happening. Noting a sizeable proportion of the economies of the world were shut down, which doesn’t happen as a matter of policy, even in wartime, I reasoned that the most important owners of capital must have signed off on the policy. I further reasoned that what was happening couldn’t have money as its principal driver, because the financial system owners & controllers stood atop the money creation process in central & TBTF banks. Money of course was a lubricant, but not the motive.
As soon as I heard talk of certificates of negative testing & of “vaccine passports”, I’m afraid I very quickly realized that the only good fit to all the observations that I could come up with was that the perpetrators intended to impose digital totalitarian control at the level of the individual.
Why they wanted to do that, I had no idea. But I remember the first time I began paying attention to what were described as vaccines, saying to my wife, confidently, that it was out of the question that help of that kind could be produced in under several years, much longer than the longest-lasting previous pandemic. I also scanned what we were told that pharma was doing, and my first reaction was “I wonder how they got around the fatal flaws in the technology?” When I’d worked on the idea of gene-based therapeutics (I never worked in the vaccines division, conveniently located on its own R&D site) I realised that they were inherently dangerous and so might potentially only be justified in life saving situations like inoperable & unresponsive cancers or inherited monogenic diseases. Once it became clear that the industry & governments were going to forced them to mass market years too fast for proper testing, the idea formed that these injections were going to be part of a control system as well as a means to kill large numbers of people with plausible deniability.
At the intellectual level, I felt unpleasantly confident in my deductions and would run through the line of reasoning every morning upon waking, desperately hoping I’d missed something.
My wife is wonderful. Instead of arguing that I must be crazy, she would say: “I believe you, but why is nobody else saying this?”
Emotionally, I was simply unprepared to join all the dots. In retrospect, I interpret this inhibition of reasoned conclusions as self-preservation. I wasn’t in any way prepared for this to happen.
I wish I could say something then happened which then yielded different answers to the simultaneous equation of what was happening and why. It never did. On the contrary, I’ve become more secure in my reasoning.
Around the end of 2020, it occurred to me that a disappointingly tiny number of people, who I knew had similar training & professional experience to me, were speaking out.
I learned from academic colleagues that they had been explicitly told not to get involved in public debate, for fear of withdrawal of important grant funding, both from governmental or quasi-governmental sources and also private, philanthropic foundations.
Accordingly, none would coauthor anything critical of government policies with me.
Almost five years later & a great deal of reading, listening and thinking further, I am distressingly convinced that the perpetrators do indeed intend to impose a digital, totalitarian control system. Furthermore, that there is a near-global intention to remove cash & leave only central bank digital currency as money.
If cashless CBDC was to be combined with a mandatory digital ID whose validity was defined among other things by being up to date with the latest fake vaccines, I could see how the perpetrators could “kill two birds with one stone” (to use a particularly dark figure of speech).
Given the nature of these gene-based injections, the long term effects of such a digital control system could hardly be other than slavery and population management.
As those who’ve followed a few trails of breadcrumbs back into the history of the antecedents of the perpetrators have discovered, this all marries up distressingly well.
There’s no need to be a conspiracy theorist when there are all too obviously a number of conspiracies. There’s nothing theoretical about them.
What we’ve experienced isn’t a medical or scientific event, really. It’s a huge crime based on deception and exploitation of human psychology, with medical and scientific adornments.
It is unreasonable to expect the perpetrators to quit at this point, though I’d be overjoyed if they did.
Perhaps the most important things I’ve learned are (1) that we don’t know anything like as much as we think we know. Much of the latter turns on others having told us things we can’t verify and having believed them. Another is (2) how easily we can be manipulated by fearful things, even when they’re borderline absurd.
While I’m now confident that I cannot be even slightly alarmed by the prospect of another fake pandemic, the perpetrators have numerous other fear-provoking options up their sleeves. War, nuclear weapons, famine, financial crises and even aliens might be sprung upon us. Fear is the ultimate weapon because humans then think poorly & are easily manipulated.
Finally, for now, digital censorship is so powerful and the number of people speaking out is so small that we must encourage & be able to rely upon those we do reach joining in a relay of activity in order to reach an order of magnitude more people as soon as possible. Only then might the perpetrators be forced to change tactics (or to pause).
Re: “I learned from academic colleagues that they had been explicitly told not to get involved in public debate, for fear of withdrawal of important grant funding, both from governmental or quasi-governmental sources and also private, philanthropic foundations.”
We need more exposure about this…
It’s devastating that the medical and scientific establishment failed to question the ‘Covid’ response, i.e. the ‘vaccine solution’ against a disease that wasn’t a problem for most people.
And the disease was ‘COVID-19’, the symptoms of which the Australian Government now says are:
How does a group of common respiratory symptoms get designated as a new specific disease? And how are they connected to ‘a specific virus’ - SARS-CoV-2?
And why did people such as Aseem Malhotra, Angus Dalgleish, John Campbell, and Robert Clancy and others take it upon themselves to assertively promote the vaccines to mass populations ? In doing so they trashed the vital principle of valid informed consent.
Thank you for writing such a personal comment. I really don’t understand your comments about how the flu is not transmitted, but I completely get your concerns about vaccine status is the basis for a totalitarian control system. And what concerns me even more than our ‘elites’ is the fact that so many otherwise normal people would be totally for it. That is what frightened me the most, when I started seeing ‘vaccinated only’ signs.
The remarks about flu not being contagious comes from patient review of all the published clinical studies in which it was the objective to study contagion.
There have been a dozen or so such studies & the striking & very obvious result is that in no case did contagion occur.
Volunteers who shared space with someone with flu developed symptoms no more often than did volunteers who spent equal amounts of time with a healthy person.
These published studies span 1918-2024.
The entire flu “vaccine” edifice lies in pieces.
It’s a huge deception.
I remember feeling quite unmoored the day I reviewed the pack of articles.
I have more to say than this but I will briefly mention that nature agrees with the good Dr!
I’ve seen this in livestock over and over. I’ve seen it in humans via family living close together.
You do not see a systematic “spread” as Hollywood and public health want you to think.
In fact you generally see quite the opposite. Nearly Always an animal or human get sick not just from some mysterious virus but a combination of stressors. That may include genetic and obviously environmental.
More later,
Cattleman
Same with wildlife
Dr. Y’s hypothesis about what influenza is, is interesting. Books like “Can you catch a cold?” give ample demonstration of not only the failure of experiments to produce sick-to-well disease transmission, but that alternative sounder explanations were tossed aside after a multi decade debate.
Just like now, the powerful were able to figure out which narrative they could weaponize and exploit.
Dr. Yeadon’s work has also appeared a lot on Lioness of Judah stack.
Jamie Andrews and associates have made major strides not just in pointing out the logical fallacies of virology but are conducting experiments that explicitly falsify it.
Thank you, Jessica. I’m honoured that you took the time to share my thoughts and sources.
Six years ago, I didn’t think any of these things. They’re not my work, either. I’ve pieced together a new understanding from the work of many other people & begun to build upon a better foundation.
I’ve very often been accused of scaremongering or of hyperbolic thinking.
I’m not interested in mounting a defence. Who cares, anyway?
I was very much a “normie” until early 2020. Weird things began to happen. People I knew were appearing on TV, saying things I was sure weren’t true and that I was pretty sure that the speakers knew weren’t true. My mind was on high alert, because nothing like this had ever happened in my lifetime.
The first time I heard talk of “lockdowns”, I confided to my wife that I thought that a group of people, operating above the level of nation, were in the process of a coup d’etat of the world. I had no idea who the perpetrators were or why they were doing it. But multiple countries were simultaneously doing the same absurd & frightening things. I quickly read half a dozen countries’ public health emergency plans. These recommended that sick people stayed home and that everyone washed their hands more often than usual. Where more authoritarian measures were mentioned in these plans, it was explicitly to exclude any of them. WHO had on their website a similar document & again, it explicitly excluded things like quarantining or mass testing the healthy, masking, school closures or border restrictions.
As we know, all of that old planning was thrown overboard simultaneously and dystopian measures were imposed.
At this point, in late March 2020, my wife later reported that I was pacing around the house and going up & down stairs, muttering under my breath, repeatedly, that “We are in so much trouble).
I kept casting around, trying to work out why all this was happening. Noting a sizeable proportion of the economies of the world were shut down, which doesn’t happen as a matter of policy, even in wartime, I reasoned that the most important owners of capital must have signed off on the policy. I further reasoned that what was happening couldn’t have money as its principal driver, because the financial system owners & controllers stood atop the money creation process in central & TBTF banks. Money of course was a lubricant, but not the motive.
As soon as I heard talk of certificates of negative testing & of “vaccine passports”, I’m afraid I very quickly realized that the only good fit to all the observations that I could come up with was that the perpetrators intended to impose digital totalitarian control at the level of the individual.
Why they wanted to do that, I had no idea. But I remember the first time I began paying attention to what were described as vaccines, saying to my wife, confidently, that it was out of the question that help of that kind could be produced in under several years, much longer than the longest-lasting previous pandemic. I also scanned what we were told that pharma was doing, and my first reaction was “I wonder how they got around the fatal flaws in the technology?” When I’d worked on the idea of gene-based therapeutics (I never worked in the vaccines division, conveniently located on its own R&D site) I realised that they were inherently dangerous and so might potentially only be justified in life saving situations like inoperable & unresponsive cancers or inherited monogenic diseases. Once it became clear that the industry & governments were going to forced them to mass market years too fast for proper testing, the idea formed that these injections were going to be part of a control system as well as a means to kill large numbers of people with plausible deniability.
At the intellectual level, I felt unpleasantly confident in my deductions and would run through the line of reasoning every morning upon waking, desperately hoping I’d missed something.
My wife is wonderful. Instead of arguing that I must be crazy, she would say: “I believe you, but why is nobody else saying this?”
Emotionally, I was simply unprepared to join all the dots. In retrospect, I interpret this inhibition of reasoned conclusions as self-preservation. I wasn’t in any way prepared for this to happen.
I wish I could say something then happened which then yielded different answers to the simultaneous equation of what was happening and why. It never did. On the contrary, I’ve become more secure in my reasoning.
Around the end of 2020, it occurred to me that a disappointingly tiny number of people, who I knew had similar training & professional experience to me, were speaking out.
I learned from academic colleagues that they had been explicitly told not to get involved in public debate, for fear of withdrawal of important grant funding, both from governmental or quasi-governmental sources and also private, philanthropic foundations.
Accordingly, none would coauthor anything critical of government policies with me.
Almost five years later & a great deal of reading, listening and thinking further, I am distressingly convinced that the perpetrators do indeed intend to impose a digital, totalitarian control system. Furthermore, that there is a near-global intention to remove cash & leave only central bank digital currency as money.
If cashless CBDC was to be combined with a mandatory digital ID whose validity was defined among other things by being up to date with the latest fake vaccines, I could see how the perpetrators could “kill two birds with one stone” (to use a particularly dark figure of speech).
Given the nature of these gene-based injections, the long term effects of such a digital control system could hardly be other than slavery and population management.
As those who’ve followed a few trails of breadcrumbs back into the history of the antecedents of the perpetrators have discovered, this all marries up distressingly well.
There’s no need to be a conspiracy theorist when there are all too obviously a number of conspiracies. There’s nothing theoretical about them.
What we’ve experienced isn’t a medical or scientific event, really. It’s a huge crime based on deception and exploitation of human psychology, with medical and scientific adornments.
It is unreasonable to expect the perpetrators to quit at this point, though I’d be overjoyed if they did.
Perhaps the most important things I’ve learned are (1) that we don’t know anything like as much as we think we know. Much of the latter turns on others having told us things we can’t verify and having believed them. Another is (2) how easily we can be manipulated by fearful things, even when they’re borderline absurd.
While I’m now confident that I cannot be even slightly alarmed by the prospect of another fake pandemic, the perpetrators have numerous other fear-provoking options up their sleeves. War, nuclear weapons, famine, financial crises and even aliens might be sprung upon us. Fear is the ultimate weapon because humans then think poorly & are easily manipulated.
Finally, for now, digital censorship is so powerful and the number of people speaking out is so small that we must encourage & be able to rely upon those we do reach joining in a relay of activity in order to reach an order of magnitude more people as soon as possible. Only then might the perpetrators be forced to change tactics (or to pause).
Many thanks,
Mike
Re: “I learned from academic colleagues that they had been explicitly told not to get involved in public debate, for fear of withdrawal of important grant funding, both from governmental or quasi-governmental sources and also private, philanthropic foundations.”
We need more exposure about this…
It’s devastating that the medical and scientific establishment failed to question the ‘Covid’ response, i.e. the ‘vaccine solution’ against a disease that wasn’t a problem for most people.
And the disease was ‘COVID-19’, the symptoms of which the Australian Government now says are:
* fever
* coughing
* sore throat
* shortness of breath
See: What exactly is 'COVID-19'? https://open.substack.com/pub/elizabethhart/p/what-exactly-is-covid-19
How does a group of common respiratory symptoms get designated as a new specific disease? And how are they connected to ‘a specific virus’ - SARS-CoV-2?
And why did people such as Aseem Malhotra, Angus Dalgleish, John Campbell, and Robert Clancy and others take it upon themselves to assertively promote the vaccines to mass populations ? In doing so they trashed the vital principle of valid informed consent.
It’s a very good question.
I wish the answer was benign, but it can’t be. Sorry.
Thank you for writing such a personal comment. I really don’t understand your comments about how the flu is not transmitted, but I completely get your concerns about vaccine status is the basis for a totalitarian control system. And what concerns me even more than our ‘elites’ is the fact that so many otherwise normal people would be totally for it. That is what frightened me the most, when I started seeing ‘vaccinated only’ signs.
The remarks about flu not being contagious comes from patient review of all the published clinical studies in which it was the objective to study contagion.
There have been a dozen or so such studies & the striking & very obvious result is that in no case did contagion occur.
Volunteers who shared space with someone with flu developed symptoms no more often than did volunteers who spent equal amounts of time with a healthy person.
These published studies span 1918-2024.
The entire flu “vaccine” edifice lies in pieces.
It’s a huge deception.
I remember feeling quite unmoored the day I reviewed the pack of articles.
This Lysenko Tower of Babel took years & years to build and the cemeteries to dig; it's so uniquely crazy that we oughta' be proud of it.
Pride comes before the fall