Thanks for writing and publishing this document. For me, it does clarify PANDA'S hypothesis, which is bold.
I definitely agree with the main conclusions - namely, there never was an unusually "deadly virus," which the authors state means there was no "pandemic" as we should correctly understand this word.
I DO think one can cite significant "evidence" - which I've tried to do in my "early spread" articles - that there was "something" that was making more people sick than a normal or, say, the previous 10 flu seasons.
Was this "something" explained by a virus that was created in a lab? Did our mad scientists create a new virus that made many more people sick, but caused the deaths of very few people?
In the future, I'll try to write a more detailed piece that highlights the majority of points I agree with and the few I don't (or the elements of my hypothesis I'm not ready to abandon). But I'm going to sleep on the points made in this article before I write that piece!
Perhaps the increased sickness was from that year's batch of flu shots? Who knows? It happened to my father a few years before covid and he had the same symptoms of a cough that clears, then good for 3 days then low oxygen despite no pneumonia.
Thankfully that time they gave him oxygen and steroids.
I keep running across that theory, which one can't rule out. Personally, I think there very-possibly could be a correlation between the massive spike in "Covid cases and deaths" in the winter of 2020-2021 and the roll-out of that year's flu vaccine.
If early spread was as wide-spread as I think - dating to November 2019 if not earlier - the next year, cases should have gone way down as most people would have had natural immunity. I definitely don't think we would have had MORE Covid cases in, say, December 2020 than we had in December 2019.
2009 is the year that Judy published XMRV. Then they put her in jail so it is not surprising that "they" didn't clean up the shots in 2009 when the causal agent for COVID was discovered and announced. NO THAT IS NOT A TYPO!!!!
There was a suspicion early on that the reason Italy fared so poorly was something related to the flu shot they had administered before the “outbreak” (eye-roll).
In fall of 2020 the flu shots were advertised to be 4x stronger than normal. Since the broader world of medical consumers acquiesed to this marketing campaign and failed to think critically they made themselves complicit in a genocide program which specifically used the mechanism of "dosing error" to get the job done. Complicity with population reduction medical protocols via simple marketing and lots of stupidity. In other words if you can fool the world into taking 4x vaccine then what really is the forensics?
There are no scientific research results to back up any of your claims. I'm afraid you're misled, and that is such a pity. Neither transmission, nor records of virus existence or real cases have been proven. This is so tiring. I don't see any learning curve. What do you expect then, with a 24/7 fear mongering and repetetive barrage of "everyone's gonna die, not enough beds and vents, we are at war" and such crap? They scared the shit out of the people.
Mass psychosis, and it seems most of the people are not through this yet. Will they ever recover?
There are many examples of how people do credibly feel physical symptoms without any real substance involved in the incident, like the placebo effect. Hypochondria is a major contributor to this. Hypochondria is partly driven by constant fear of sickness. The 1995 Sarin poison event in Tokyo is a good example. I once read about this that people from all over Japan called for emergency, AFTER hearing about Tokyo in the news, because of alleged symptoms of poisoning without basis to this "perception". This was an afternoon in Kindergarden, compared to the 24/7 broadcasting about the "covid crisis".
One quick point: One reason I'm confident my early spread hypothesis is important is because I've noted all the "evidence" of the things the virus sleuths did NOT do, but would have done if they were sincerely investigating the possibility a novel virus was spreading.
For example, key public health officials, for some reason, throttled access to antibody tests and they delayed those PCR tests ... they didn't interview people who had Covid symptoms in 2019 and later tested positive for antibodies ... Antibody tests of archived blood they could have done, they didn't do ...
I've always thought the evidence these virus detectives didn't investigate cases they should have investigated strongly suggests the Pandemic Producers were covering their tracks. For some reason, they didn't want the public to know this virus had infected millions of people by the time the Wuhan oubreak occurred. My thought has always been they did this because they didn't want any real virus sleuths finding out who created this virus (and where virus spread might have originated - perhaps it wasn't in Wuhan?) or, most importantly, who created it.
Based on my research, there's no doubt officials did not investigate things any sincere investigator would have investigated. So, per my hypothesis, they were (by many methods) concealing evidence of this virus circulating and infecting many people. Why would this be so important to them?
This posited, it now occurs to me their motive could have been to conceal evidence that might prove there never was a novel virus at all.
Still, I keep coming back to the fact "something" was making more people sick in November - February than in recent years and I don't discount the testimonials of the millions of people who report there were features of their illnesses that were different with these bouts of sickness.
Was it just a coincidence so many more people got sick right before the Pandemic of the Century was officially announced?
If the above oddities could not be noted, I wouldn't be as wedded to my early spread theory as I am. But I have taken note of a long list of things that don't make sense if public health officials were sincerely interested in dating and identifying origins of any novel virus spread.
The chief disagreement is the concept and mechanism of "spread" key term/concept
Citing the statement
"The models developed and used to predict the course of the “pandemic” and inform governments as to what measures they should take are underpinned by multiple baseless assumptions about how viruses spread. In truth, the evidence base regarding mechanisms of transmission for respiratory viral pathogens is extraordinarily thin. This is especially the case for pathogens for which the population has substantial prior immunity."
IMO, person-to-person spread of viral respiratory pathogen is, at best, undemonstrated and at worst a govt/military fabrication.
Moreover, health departments, individual doctors, and others offered all manner of experimental shots in fall 1918, with the hope/promise of deterring the purported flu from afar.
The aspirin theory has been well-covered elsewhere.
Suffice to say, the storied 1918 "pandemic" also has the markings of an iatrogenic event.
I said the day it began that I wasn’t going to catch it, whatever IT was, and I didn’t. Two other family members—one 90–never got it, in spite of no masks, traveling and using public restrooms, and eating out frequently. This tells me it wasn’t novel and it wasn’t, well, pretty much anything they said it was. I think it was possibly seeded in certain locations and that’s why there was no curiosity on their part about early cases. They knew.
As an old journalist, I think you might be burying the lede. You've got the main big scandals, which we all agree on, I think. But the unexplored unexposed scandal would be the rigging of the PCR tests - and the antibody tests - to support the bogus virus theory. How many people would have to have been involved in pulling that off? Basically, you are saying that every positive PCR test and antibody test that said "this person had/has Covid" was bogus ... and intentionally so.
I can see that with the PCR tests (or most of them, especially the later tests - in the Spring!), but I'm not as convinced that we can/should throw out all the antibody tests.
But as this article notes, the key to pulling off a Bogus Pandemic would be be doctoring the PCR tests. And then everyone who created that test, read the test results, said it couldn't be questioned ... was in on a massive and diabolical conspiracy.
In a future article, I'd love to see you opine on why PCR tests weren't being administered widely in, say, February 2020. There must be a reason. I do note that in America the CDC controlled all the PCR testing until March 5th, 2020 and controlled who got tested (just people who had returned from China) and, more importantly in my view, who didn't get tested. That has to be significant for some reason.
You don't have to "doctor" PCR tests. You just have to introduce a test that picks up and/or comes back positive for something that's already out there/in us.
That is precisely what happened with H1N1. Do you know H1N1 is a separate test?
Flu season had come to a close when the H1N1 scam launched. Note that not only are a bunch of H1N1 positives suddenly discovered (in the summer), but we also see that increased testing for flu A/B results in....more positives tests for flu A/B. In the summer, no less.
Think we should've been calling flu season "flu shot and testing season".
You do know that the PCR test does not actually test for Covid (the disease). It allegedly tests for a fragment of the alleged virus - SARS-CoV2 that is also just alleged to ‘cause’ the disease Covid 19.
The antigen/antibody tests also do not test for Covid (the disease); they test for non specific antibodies/antigens that may exist for any number of reasons - alleged prior ‘infection’/current ‘infection’/or for no reason at all.
There was no test rigging required as it was easy to fool and continue to fool those who had not specifically looked into the details of these tests - as they don’t test for Covid.
It's easy to fake the PCR, they turned up and down the amplification factor... Past 28 cycles there's a huge rate of false positives.
Genetics is based on a lot of assumptions in the purity of the technology to measure tiny things. But PCR proves that tools introduce huge errors if used the wrong way.
The inventor of PCR, Kary Mullis was saying that it's not a diagnostic!
Bill, are you familiar with the work of Reiner Feullmich and the Corona Investigative Committee? He was persuing legal prosecution based on PCR fallicy. He arrived in the U.S. from Germany in April 22nd 2022 and visited RFK Jr. who did not support Reiners strategy. Reiner was kidnapped and trafficked back to EU from Mexico. He is currently in jail. Any chance a powerful international prosecuting attorney will pick up where Reiner left off?
Based on my research, hospitals were killing people with ventilators and Remdesivir and calling it "COVID." Also there is a huge paid effort for actors online to distract from the truth.
My position is that they aren't substantiated by data at this point.
Regarding NYC...the ventilator data, in particular, does not permit us to say that in the Wave 1 timeframe the hospital inpatient toll can be blamed primarily on vent use. It's a matter of not knowing how many patients went on and came off vents, let alone how many of the 20K hospital deaths were people who had been on a vent at some point.
"I DO think one can cite significant "evidence" - which I've tried to do in my "early spread" articles - that there was "something" that was making more people sick than a normal or, say, the previous 10 flu seasons.
Was this "something" explained by a virus that was created in a lab? Did our mad scientists create a new virus that made many more people sick, but caused the deaths of very few people?"
Way to be level headed. Thank you. XMRV was discovered in 2005/2006 and published to be associated with chronic illness in 2009. The virus was not new at that point but the discovery and disease association were new. Since XMRV was suspected to be distributed to the population via contaminated blood supply and supposedly unavoidable contamination of injectables. Why are we looking for some new thing instead of acknowledging that the new thing was found a while ago and we have all been seduced into ignoring it?
Also mentioned is that coronaviruses replicate poorly at 1:34:00 he makes quite an amazing observation that there is no way a poorly replicating RNA virus can circle the world at same lethality, same fidelity... I'm paraphrasing, but he states the fact that this "virus" only had 3 or 4 amino acid sequence changes travelling the world, when the original SARS had sequence changes of 40 to 50 sequence changes PER PATIENT... Means the whole notion of a single coronavirus travelling the world like this is impossible, or at best unprecedented...
Also a great demonstration in the commonality of coronaviruses and ramping up a PCR test to look for a "novel" coronavirus...
You must get a lot of videos forwarded which would be time consuming, but this is very well answered and thoroughly worth your time.
"Not only does PANDA argue against there having been a pandemic, we also do not accept that it has been proven that something novel spread person-to-person from some point directly causing waves of a novel illness. In PANDA’s assessment, there is no convincing evidence supporting this hypothesis. It is important to note that the establishment narrative requires that all three of these elements be true:
That viruses can be engineered so as to have dangerous pandemic potential.
That the waves of deaths and serious illnesses are linked to the spread of such a virus.
That the virus and disease caused by it are novel, under any rational meaning of that word.
Every characteristic of Covid and all the harms pinned on “the pandemic” can be accounted for by a combination of: the features of known respiratory infectious illnesses; observation and confirmation bias; maltreatment, non-treatment or inappropriate treatment; and other harms consequent to the response to the perception (false, in our view) that a novel deadly virus was circulating."
Perfectly stated. Brings the focus back from the current Washington DC love fests to where it should always have been from the very beginning. Thanks for the PANDA post.
I'm from rural Missouri where we did not experience large numbers of scary illnesses and death. We did have a wave of worse than usual death in our nursing homes.
If a novel virus was never there what did the high numbers of black people in St. Louis, Missouri die of at that time?
Just a bad flu?
In Sweden a large number of very dark skinned Somali taxi drivers and their families died too. But Sweden treated them, and this was early, as Vitamin D deficient, instructing them to intake large amounts of supplements, and a few other helpful over the counter things I can't remember.
These people were also new to Sweden, usually having been there under 3 years.
Did they die of the same flu or were there different ones in different areas of the world?
When the WHO initially declared a pandemic, my initial reaction was to think it might have been an accidental decision. However, as I learned more about the complex connections involving these unelected officials, from the WHO to the Department of Health and Human Services, it became clear that this was no mistake. It was a deliberate effort aimed at disrupting the antibiotic industry to pave the way for mRNA technology under the guise of a ‘One Shot’ solution, accompanied by a blend of tyrannical measures and censorship.
In the future, if I observe genuine panic across various demographics, then I’ll be convinced we’re facing an actual pandemic, rather than adhering to the directives of elites who stand to gain from their mandates and suppressive actions.
My piece from today also support the conclusion that there was/is no "deadly" virus.
If this novel virus was deadly, there would be at least one or two people who worked at the public health agencies who died from the virus, right? I don't know of any public health employee anywhere in America who died from Covid.
I, for one, got pretty sick (tested positive, unvaxxed) in 2021/22 (? it's hazy) but hadn't had a flu shot in years.
It was gnarlier than any flu I had ever had. That said, if my primary doctor had been more responsive (i.e not a branch covidian) it would have been easier. I had to go to a functional doctor after enduring a week long fever and bronchitis to get steroids and some other things to help. It took a little less than a couple of months to fully recover my strength and lung capacity. I did have a cool husky voice for a while. However, I have had only one minor sniffle since than time so I ain't complaining about my choices.
Regardless of the existence of a novel coronavirus, if people had been adequately treated for ANY severe respiratory infection, this would have been no different than any other time. IMO denial of standard treatments i.e. steroids, antibiotics etc.. combined with horrible protocols, stress-inducing societal measures and mRNA transfections worked together to create all the additional misery, suffering and death we have seen.
This power couple which no one cares to research collaborated with the United Hospitalers on the 23rd floor of the Empire State Building to get the job done. The nurses and doctors at your hospital are psychopaths but they are specifically and well trained by the grandparents of the Chan Zuckerburg Biohub to worship death.
Hypoxemic patients presenting at hospitals as I recall were only 10-15% as one might expect in a bad "flu" year. They could have been treated with HBOT but that EUA request was denied by the FDA by mid 2020.
By the time the hype from the Imperial College of London modeler made its media inroad based on faulty data the plandemic funded by Bill Gates became well established. See the $$$ trail from him to the Imperial College of London. When I saw the money trail I was furious. He was in on this manipulation too with the Steering Committee at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Remember Event 201?
Thanks for writing and publishing this document. For me, it does clarify PANDA'S hypothesis, which is bold.
I definitely agree with the main conclusions - namely, there never was an unusually "deadly virus," which the authors state means there was no "pandemic" as we should correctly understand this word.
I DO think one can cite significant "evidence" - which I've tried to do in my "early spread" articles - that there was "something" that was making more people sick than a normal or, say, the previous 10 flu seasons.
Was this "something" explained by a virus that was created in a lab? Did our mad scientists create a new virus that made many more people sick, but caused the deaths of very few people?
In the future, I'll try to write a more detailed piece that highlights the majority of points I agree with and the few I don't (or the elements of my hypothesis I'm not ready to abandon). But I'm going to sleep on the points made in this article before I write that piece!
Perhaps the increased sickness was from that year's batch of flu shots? Who knows? It happened to my father a few years before covid and he had the same symptoms of a cough that clears, then good for 3 days then low oxygen despite no pneumonia.
Thankfully that time they gave him oxygen and steroids.
Same thing that helps with covid and allergies.
It's probably vax induced.
I keep running across that theory, which one can't rule out. Personally, I think there very-possibly could be a correlation between the massive spike in "Covid cases and deaths" in the winter of 2020-2021 and the roll-out of that year's flu vaccine.
If early spread was as wide-spread as I think - dating to November 2019 if not earlier - the next year, cases should have gone way down as most people would have had natural immunity. I definitely don't think we would have had MORE Covid cases in, say, December 2020 than we had in December 2019.
https://x.com/Wood_House76/status/1710745807450784137?s=20
Flu shot and other shot problems go back pretty far, IMO, and got worse from 2009 onward.
https://www.disabledveterans.org/flu-vaccine-increases-coronavirus-risk/
2009 is the year that Judy published XMRV. Then they put her in jail so it is not surprising that "they" didn't clean up the shots in 2009 when the causal agent for COVID was discovered and announced. NO THAT IS NOT A TYPO!!!!
There was a suspicion early on that the reason Italy fared so poorly was something related to the flu shot they had administered before the “outbreak” (eye-roll).
In fall of 2020 the flu shots were advertised to be 4x stronger than normal. Since the broader world of medical consumers acquiesed to this marketing campaign and failed to think critically they made themselves complicit in a genocide program which specifically used the mechanism of "dosing error" to get the job done. Complicity with population reduction medical protocols via simple marketing and lots of stupidity. In other words if you can fool the world into taking 4x vaccine then what really is the forensics?
Rob, what go you think about the hospital protocols homicides in China and the United States in 2020 with Remdesivir and ventilators?
There are no scientific research results to back up any of your claims. I'm afraid you're misled, and that is such a pity. Neither transmission, nor records of virus existence or real cases have been proven. This is so tiring. I don't see any learning curve. What do you expect then, with a 24/7 fear mongering and repetetive barrage of "everyone's gonna die, not enough beds and vents, we are at war" and such crap? They scared the shit out of the people.
Mass psychosis, and it seems most of the people are not through this yet. Will they ever recover?
Idk if you are right but I DO KNOW your right about mass pyschosis. Especially in the urban young and educated.
No, they are not done, and so badly, oddly, wanted an emergency to live through.
There are many examples of how people do credibly feel physical symptoms without any real substance involved in the incident, like the placebo effect. Hypochondria is a major contributor to this. Hypochondria is partly driven by constant fear of sickness. The 1995 Sarin poison event in Tokyo is a good example. I once read about this that people from all over Japan called for emergency, AFTER hearing about Tokyo in the news, because of alleged symptoms of poisoning without basis to this "perception". This was an afternoon in Kindergarden, compared to the 24/7 broadcasting about the "covid crisis".
Science is the Guilty party. They are not the arbiters of truth.
"Science." Not, Science. lol.
One quick point: One reason I'm confident my early spread hypothesis is important is because I've noted all the "evidence" of the things the virus sleuths did NOT do, but would have done if they were sincerely investigating the possibility a novel virus was spreading.
For example, key public health officials, for some reason, throttled access to antibody tests and they delayed those PCR tests ... they didn't interview people who had Covid symptoms in 2019 and later tested positive for antibodies ... Antibody tests of archived blood they could have done, they didn't do ...
I've always thought the evidence these virus detectives didn't investigate cases they should have investigated strongly suggests the Pandemic Producers were covering their tracks. For some reason, they didn't want the public to know this virus had infected millions of people by the time the Wuhan oubreak occurred. My thought has always been they did this because they didn't want any real virus sleuths finding out who created this virus (and where virus spread might have originated - perhaps it wasn't in Wuhan?) or, most importantly, who created it.
Based on my research, there's no doubt officials did not investigate things any sincere investigator would have investigated. So, per my hypothesis, they were (by many methods) concealing evidence of this virus circulating and infecting many people. Why would this be so important to them?
This posited, it now occurs to me their motive could have been to conceal evidence that might prove there never was a novel virus at all.
Still, I keep coming back to the fact "something" was making more people sick in November - February than in recent years and I don't discount the testimonials of the millions of people who report there were features of their illnesses that were different with these bouts of sickness.
Was it just a coincidence so many more people got sick right before the Pandemic of the Century was officially announced?
If the above oddities could not be noted, I wouldn't be as wedded to my early spread theory as I am. But I have taken note of a long list of things that don't make sense if public health officials were sincerely interested in dating and identifying origins of any novel virus spread.
The chief disagreement is the concept and mechanism of "spread" key term/concept
Citing the statement
"The models developed and used to predict the course of the “pandemic” and inform governments as to what measures they should take are underpinned by multiple baseless assumptions about how viruses spread. In truth, the evidence base regarding mechanisms of transmission for respiratory viral pathogens is extraordinarily thin. This is especially the case for pathogens for which the population has substantial prior immunity."
IMO, person-to-person spread of viral respiratory pathogen is, at best, undemonstrated and at worst a govt/military fabrication.
They couldn't even transmit the Spanish flu...
https://www.ggarchives.com/Influenza/TheRosenauExperiment-1918-1919.html
Correct.
Moreover, health departments, individual doctors, and others offered all manner of experimental shots in fall 1918, with the hope/promise of deterring the purported flu from afar.
The aspirin theory has been well-covered elsewhere.
Suffice to say, the storied 1918 "pandemic" also has the markings of an iatrogenic event.
I said the day it began that I wasn’t going to catch it, whatever IT was, and I didn’t. Two other family members—one 90–never got it, in spite of no masks, traveling and using public restrooms, and eating out frequently. This tells me it wasn’t novel and it wasn’t, well, pretty much anything they said it was. I think it was possibly seeded in certain locations and that’s why there was no curiosity on their part about early cases. They knew.
As an old journalist, I think you might be burying the lede. You've got the main big scandals, which we all agree on, I think. But the unexplored unexposed scandal would be the rigging of the PCR tests - and the antibody tests - to support the bogus virus theory. How many people would have to have been involved in pulling that off? Basically, you are saying that every positive PCR test and antibody test that said "this person had/has Covid" was bogus ... and intentionally so.
I can see that with the PCR tests (or most of them, especially the later tests - in the Spring!), but I'm not as convinced that we can/should throw out all the antibody tests.
But as this article notes, the key to pulling off a Bogus Pandemic would be be doctoring the PCR tests. And then everyone who created that test, read the test results, said it couldn't be questioned ... was in on a massive and diabolical conspiracy.
In a future article, I'd love to see you opine on why PCR tests weren't being administered widely in, say, February 2020. There must be a reason. I do note that in America the CDC controlled all the PCR testing until March 5th, 2020 and controlled who got tested (just people who had returned from China) and, more importantly in my view, who didn't get tested. That has to be significant for some reason.
PCR tests were being administered
For flu.
Just like they have been for years.
You don't have to "doctor" PCR tests. You just have to introduce a test that picks up and/or comes back positive for something that's already out there/in us.
That is precisely what happened with H1N1. Do you know H1N1 is a separate test?
Also, look closely at Figure 7: https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/setting-the-stage-for-flus-disappearing
Flu season had come to a close when the H1N1 scam launched. Note that not only are a bunch of H1N1 positives suddenly discovered (in the summer), but we also see that increased testing for flu A/B results in....more positives tests for flu A/B. In the summer, no less.
Think we should've been calling flu season "flu shot and testing season".
You do know that the PCR test does not actually test for Covid (the disease). It allegedly tests for a fragment of the alleged virus - SARS-CoV2 that is also just alleged to ‘cause’ the disease Covid 19.
The antigen/antibody tests also do not test for Covid (the disease); they test for non specific antibodies/antigens that may exist for any number of reasons - alleged prior ‘infection’/current ‘infection’/or for no reason at all.
There was no test rigging required as it was easy to fool and continue to fool those who had not specifically looked into the details of these tests - as they don’t test for Covid.
It's easy to fake the PCR, they turned up and down the amplification factor... Past 28 cycles there's a huge rate of false positives.
Genetics is based on a lot of assumptions in the purity of the technology to measure tiny things. But PCR proves that tools introduce huge errors if used the wrong way.
The inventor of PCR, Kary Mullis was saying that it's not a diagnostic!
They scammed us good.
Bill, are you familiar with the work of Reiner Feullmich and the Corona Investigative Committee? He was persuing legal prosecution based on PCR fallicy. He arrived in the U.S. from Germany in April 22nd 2022 and visited RFK Jr. who did not support Reiners strategy. Reiner was kidnapped and trafficked back to EU from Mexico. He is currently in jail. Any chance a powerful international prosecuting attorney will pick up where Reiner left off?
https://thepascorrupt.substack.com/p/the-corona-investigative-committee?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2&triedRedirect=true
Based on my research, hospitals were killing people with ventilators and Remdesivir and calling it "COVID." Also there is a huge paid effort for actors online to distract from the truth.
I don't dispute the role of those things.
My position is that they aren't substantiated by data at this point.
Regarding NYC...the ventilator data, in particular, does not permit us to say that in the Wave 1 timeframe the hospital inpatient toll can be blamed primarily on vent use. It's a matter of not knowing how many patients went on and came off vents, let alone how many of the 20K hospital deaths were people who had been on a vent at some point.
https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/we-still-dont-know-how-many-people
I think I've pointed this out to you a number of times. :)
I didn't say it was the entire wave. And you say it played a role, so I don't understand your comment.
Do you understand the article?
"I DO think one can cite significant "evidence" - which I've tried to do in my "early spread" articles - that there was "something" that was making more people sick than a normal or, say, the previous 10 flu seasons.
Was this "something" explained by a virus that was created in a lab? Did our mad scientists create a new virus that made many more people sick, but caused the deaths of very few people?"
Way to be level headed. Thank you. XMRV was discovered in 2005/2006 and published to be associated with chronic illness in 2009. The virus was not new at that point but the discovery and disease association were new. Since XMRV was suspected to be distributed to the population via contaminated blood supply and supposedly unavoidable contamination of injectables. Why are we looking for some new thing instead of acknowledging that the new thing was found a while ago and we have all been seduced into ignoring it?
Do you really want the truth?
https://plaguethebook.com/
Read the whole thing! (as they used to say) about 6 8.5x11 pages of text. But if you have had enough of it and can't takes no more! This will suffice:
"PCR testing created the illusion that something novel was spreading, whereas in fact all that was truly spreading was the testing itself"
I contributed to the statement so I’ve definitely read it :)
This is I think, probably best expressed by JJ Couey's testimony to the National Citizens Enquiry in Canada...
And humour me, when you have free time watch this...
He demonstrated the impossibility of covid very well...
Start at 24:15 and watch for about 10 mins... Especially at 34:45
Exactly what I've been thinking... My old biology book had this, and it's still valid, and I think what they've done...
🎯💯
https://rumble.com/v2kzyiq-jjcouey-dr.-jj-couey-phd-testifies-at-the-nci-national-citizens-inquiry-res.html
Also mentioned is that coronaviruses replicate poorly at 1:34:00 he makes quite an amazing observation that there is no way a poorly replicating RNA virus can circle the world at same lethality, same fidelity... I'm paraphrasing, but he states the fact that this "virus" only had 3 or 4 amino acid sequence changes travelling the world, when the original SARS had sequence changes of 40 to 50 sequence changes PER PATIENT... Means the whole notion of a single coronavirus travelling the world like this is impossible, or at best unprecedented...
Also a great demonstration in the commonality of coronaviruses and ramping up a PCR test to look for a "novel" coronavirus...
You must get a lot of videos forwarded which would be time consuming, but this is very well answered and thoroughly worth your time.
Yes, I've seen this and I e-know JJ.
I am also a member of PANDA, and I can say the article also represents my views.
"Not only does PANDA argue against there having been a pandemic, we also do not accept that it has been proven that something novel spread person-to-person from some point directly causing waves of a novel illness. In PANDA’s assessment, there is no convincing evidence supporting this hypothesis. It is important to note that the establishment narrative requires that all three of these elements be true:
That viruses can be engineered so as to have dangerous pandemic potential.
That the waves of deaths and serious illnesses are linked to the spread of such a virus.
That the virus and disease caused by it are novel, under any rational meaning of that word.
Every characteristic of Covid and all the harms pinned on “the pandemic” can be accounted for by a combination of: the features of known respiratory infectious illnesses; observation and confirmation bias; maltreatment, non-treatment or inappropriate treatment; and other harms consequent to the response to the perception (false, in our view) that a novel deadly virus was circulating."
Perfectly stated. Brings the focus back from the current Washington DC love fests to where it should always have been from the very beginning. Thanks for the PANDA post.
I'm from rural Missouri where we did not experience large numbers of scary illnesses and death. We did have a wave of worse than usual death in our nursing homes.
If a novel virus was never there what did the high numbers of black people in St. Louis, Missouri die of at that time?
Just a bad flu?
In Sweden a large number of very dark skinned Somali taxi drivers and their families died too. But Sweden treated them, and this was early, as Vitamin D deficient, instructing them to intake large amounts of supplements, and a few other helpful over the counter things I can't remember.
These people were also new to Sweden, usually having been there under 3 years.
Did they die of the same flu or were there different ones in different areas of the world?
How does that work?
When the WHO initially declared a pandemic, my initial reaction was to think it might have been an accidental decision. However, as I learned more about the complex connections involving these unelected officials, from the WHO to the Department of Health and Human Services, it became clear that this was no mistake. It was a deliberate effort aimed at disrupting the antibiotic industry to pave the way for mRNA technology under the guise of a ‘One Shot’ solution, accompanied by a blend of tyrannical measures and censorship.
In the future, if I observe genuine panic across various demographics, then I’ll be convinced we’re facing an actual pandemic, rather than adhering to the directives of elites who stand to gain from their mandates and suppressive actions.
This is excellent.
In 2019 the Brazilian Ministry of Defense established the:
ACADEMIC COOPERATION PROGRAM IN NATIONAL DEFENSE (PROCAD)
https://www.gov.br/defesa/pt-br/arquivos/ensino_e_pesquisa/defesa_academia/procad/2020/ap13a_gestaoa_ea_governancaa_ema_biosseguranca.pdf
The coordinator, Prof. Claudio Mafra, was in USA during 9/11. One of the PROCAD sponsors is:
Galveston National Laboratory of the University of Texas Medical Branch, EUA
https://www.utmb.edu/gnl/ https://www.utmb.edu/gnl/research/wrceva
which is part of the following network:
https://creid-network.org/network-map
You will notice that PERU, ECUADOR and MANAUS, in Brazil, were early covid outbreak sites in April of 2020.
My piece from today also support the conclusion that there was/is no "deadly" virus.
If this novel virus was deadly, there would be at least one or two people who worked at the public health agencies who died from the virus, right? I don't know of any public health employee anywhere in America who died from Covid.
https://billricejr.substack.com/p/how-many-employees-at-public-health?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2
Too too weird. This thing just get's more ludicrous at each stage.
I, for one, got pretty sick (tested positive, unvaxxed) in 2021/22 (? it's hazy) but hadn't had a flu shot in years.
It was gnarlier than any flu I had ever had. That said, if my primary doctor had been more responsive (i.e not a branch covidian) it would have been easier. I had to go to a functional doctor after enduring a week long fever and bronchitis to get steroids and some other things to help. It took a little less than a couple of months to fully recover my strength and lung capacity. I did have a cool husky voice for a while. However, I have had only one minor sniffle since than time so I ain't complaining about my choices.
Regardless of the existence of a novel coronavirus, if people had been adequately treated for ANY severe respiratory infection, this would have been no different than any other time. IMO denial of standard treatments i.e. steroids, antibiotics etc.. combined with horrible protocols, stress-inducing societal measures and mRNA transfections worked together to create all the additional misery, suffering and death we have seen.
Sounds like pneumonia, which has many and numerous potential causes/causal agents.
Agreed that it's the lack of time-tested/normal treatments that aggravates illness/outcomes. Maltreatment is even worse.
But how would they get THAT whole larger group of nurses and doctors to malpractice on millions of people around the globe?
When my local, rural hospital nurse friend tells me they are having "lots of covid" right now, now do I respond?
The answer to your question Philip is that Hank Greenburgs wife trained "Hospital Legal Council" what is right and wrong regarding end- of- life care.
https://www.amazon.com/stores/Connie-Zuckerman/author/B001K7U6LA?ref=ap_rdr&isDramIntegrated=true&shoppingPortalEnabled=true
https://www.goodreads.com/author/list/574106.Connie_Zuckerman
This power couple which no one cares to research collaborated with the United Hospitalers on the 23rd floor of the Empire State Building to get the job done. The nurses and doctors at your hospital are psychopaths but they are specifically and well trained by the grandparents of the Chan Zuckerburg Biohub to worship death.
Hypoxemic patients presenting at hospitals as I recall were only 10-15% as one might expect in a bad "flu" year. They could have been treated with HBOT but that EUA request was denied by the FDA by mid 2020.
By the time the hype from the Imperial College of London modeler made its media inroad based on faulty data the plandemic funded by Bill Gates became well established. See the $$$ trail from him to the Imperial College of London. When I saw the money trail I was furious. He was in on this manipulation too with the Steering Committee at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Remember Event 201?
This might help
https://thecovidchronicles.substack.com/p/happy-anniversary-c63
https://chemtrails.substack.com/p/hospital-caught-stockpiling-dead
Individual brief outbreaks, NYC, N Italy. Photo ops. We have discussed this. Men with briefcases. Multiplicity.
Multiplicity.
Do not get caught flat-footed.
Trans:
Many Things At Once.
I believe, I do, that Kary Mullis had something to say about that. Mebbe jes lil ol me.
Yessum. They was.
Of Fear.