Thanks for writing and publishing this document. For me, it does clarify PANDA'S hypothesis, which is bold.
I definitely agree with the main conclusions - namely, there never was an unusually "deadly virus," which the authors state means there was no "pandemic" as we should correctly understand this word.
I DO think one can cite significant "evidence" - which I've tried to do in my "early spread" articles - that there was "something" that was making more people sick than a normal or, say, the previous 10 flu seasons.
Was this "something" explained by a virus that was created in a lab? Did our mad scientists create a new virus that made many more people sick, but caused the deaths of very few people?
In the future, I'll try to write a more detailed piece that highlights the majority of points I agree with and the few I don't (or the elements of my hypothesis I'm not ready to abandon). But I'm going to sleep on the points made in this article before I write that piece!
Also mentioned is that coronaviruses replicate poorly at 1:34:00 he makes quite an amazing observation that there is no way a poorly replicating RNA virus can circle the world at same lethality, same fidelity... I'm paraphrasing, but he states the fact that this "virus" only had 3 or 4 amino acid sequence changes travelling the world, when the original SARS had sequence changes of 40 to 50 sequence changes PER PATIENT... Means the whole notion of a single coronavirus travelling the world like this is impossible, or at best unprecedented...
Also a great demonstration in the commonality of coronaviruses and ramping up a PCR test to look for a "novel" coronavirus...
You must get a lot of videos forwarded which would be time consuming, but this is very well answered and thoroughly worth your time.
"Not only does PANDA argue against there having been a pandemic, we also do not accept that it has been proven that something novel spread person-to-person from some point directly causing waves of a novel illness. In PANDA’s assessment, there is no convincing evidence supporting this hypothesis. It is important to note that the establishment narrative requires that all three of these elements be true:
That viruses can be engineered so as to have dangerous pandemic potential.
That the waves of deaths and serious illnesses are linked to the spread of such a virus.
That the virus and disease caused by it are novel, under any rational meaning of that word.
Every characteristic of Covid and all the harms pinned on “the pandemic” can be accounted for by a combination of: the features of known respiratory infectious illnesses; observation and confirmation bias; maltreatment, non-treatment or inappropriate treatment; and other harms consequent to the response to the perception (false, in our view) that a novel deadly virus was circulating."
Perfectly stated. Brings the focus back from the current Washington DC love fests to where it should always have been from the very beginning. Thanks for the PANDA post.
When the WHO initially declared a pandemic, my initial reaction was to think it might have been an accidental decision. However, as I learned more about the complex connections involving these unelected officials, from the WHO to the Department of Health and Human Services, it became clear that this was no mistake. It was a deliberate effort aimed at disrupting the antibiotic industry to pave the way for mRNA technology under the guise of a ‘One Shot’ solution, accompanied by a blend of tyrannical measures and censorship.
In the future, if I observe genuine panic across various demographics, then I’ll be convinced we’re facing an actual pandemic, rather than adhering to the directives of elites who stand to gain from their mandates and suppressive actions.
My piece from today also support the conclusion that there was/is no "deadly" virus.
If this novel virus was deadly, there would be at least one or two people who worked at the public health agencies who died from the virus, right? I don't know of any public health employee anywhere in America who died from Covid.
I, for one, got pretty sick (tested positive, unvaxxed) in 2021/22 (? it's hazy) but hadn't had a flu shot in years.
It was gnarlier than any flu I had ever had. That said, if my primary doctor had been more responsive (i.e not a branch covidian) it would have been easier. I had to go to a functional doctor after enduring a week long fever and bronchitis to get steroids and some other things to help. It took a little less than a couple of months to fully recover my strength and lung capacity. I did have a cool husky voice for a while. However, I have had only one minor sniffle since than time so I ain't complaining about my choices.
Regardless of the existence of a novel coronavirus, if people had been adequately treated for ANY severe respiratory infection, this would have been no different than any other time. IMO denial of standard treatments i.e. steroids, antibiotics etc.. combined with horrible protocols, stress-inducing societal measures and mRNA transfections worked together to create all the additional misery, suffering and death we have seen.
Hypoxemic patients presenting at hospitals as I recall were only 10-15% as one might expect in a bad "flu" year. They could have been treated with HBOT but that EUA request was denied by the FDA by mid 2020.
By the time the hype from the Imperial College of London modeler made its media inroad based on faulty data the plandemic funded by Bill Gates became well established. See the $$$ trail from him to the Imperial College of London. When I saw the money trail I was furious. He was in on this manipulation too with the Steering Committee at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Remember Event 201?
Thanks for writing and publishing this document. For me, it does clarify PANDA'S hypothesis, which is bold.
I definitely agree with the main conclusions - namely, there never was an unusually "deadly virus," which the authors state means there was no "pandemic" as we should correctly understand this word.
I DO think one can cite significant "evidence" - which I've tried to do in my "early spread" articles - that there was "something" that was making more people sick than a normal or, say, the previous 10 flu seasons.
Was this "something" explained by a virus that was created in a lab? Did our mad scientists create a new virus that made many more people sick, but caused the deaths of very few people?
In the future, I'll try to write a more detailed piece that highlights the majority of points I agree with and the few I don't (or the elements of my hypothesis I'm not ready to abandon). But I'm going to sleep on the points made in this article before I write that piece!
Read the whole thing! (as they used to say) about 6 8.5x11 pages of text. But if you have had enough of it and can't takes no more! This will suffice:
"PCR testing created the illusion that something novel was spreading, whereas in fact all that was truly spreading was the testing itself"
This is I think, probably best expressed by JJ Couey's testimony to the National Citizens Enquiry in Canada...
And humour me, when you have free time watch this...
He demonstrated the impossibility of covid very well...
Start at 24:15 and watch for about 10 mins... Especially at 34:45
Exactly what I've been thinking... My old biology book had this, and it's still valid, and I think what they've done...
🎯💯
https://rumble.com/v2kzyiq-jjcouey-dr.-jj-couey-phd-testifies-at-the-nci-national-citizens-inquiry-res.html
Also mentioned is that coronaviruses replicate poorly at 1:34:00 he makes quite an amazing observation that there is no way a poorly replicating RNA virus can circle the world at same lethality, same fidelity... I'm paraphrasing, but he states the fact that this "virus" only had 3 or 4 amino acid sequence changes travelling the world, when the original SARS had sequence changes of 40 to 50 sequence changes PER PATIENT... Means the whole notion of a single coronavirus travelling the world like this is impossible, or at best unprecedented...
Also a great demonstration in the commonality of coronaviruses and ramping up a PCR test to look for a "novel" coronavirus...
You must get a lot of videos forwarded which would be time consuming, but this is very well answered and thoroughly worth your time.
I am also a member of PANDA, and I can say the article also represents my views.
"Not only does PANDA argue against there having been a pandemic, we also do not accept that it has been proven that something novel spread person-to-person from some point directly causing waves of a novel illness. In PANDA’s assessment, there is no convincing evidence supporting this hypothesis. It is important to note that the establishment narrative requires that all three of these elements be true:
That viruses can be engineered so as to have dangerous pandemic potential.
That the waves of deaths and serious illnesses are linked to the spread of such a virus.
That the virus and disease caused by it are novel, under any rational meaning of that word.
Every characteristic of Covid and all the harms pinned on “the pandemic” can be accounted for by a combination of: the features of known respiratory infectious illnesses; observation and confirmation bias; maltreatment, non-treatment or inappropriate treatment; and other harms consequent to the response to the perception (false, in our view) that a novel deadly virus was circulating."
Perfectly stated. Brings the focus back from the current Washington DC love fests to where it should always have been from the very beginning. Thanks for the PANDA post.
When the WHO initially declared a pandemic, my initial reaction was to think it might have been an accidental decision. However, as I learned more about the complex connections involving these unelected officials, from the WHO to the Department of Health and Human Services, it became clear that this was no mistake. It was a deliberate effort aimed at disrupting the antibiotic industry to pave the way for mRNA technology under the guise of a ‘One Shot’ solution, accompanied by a blend of tyrannical measures and censorship.
In the future, if I observe genuine panic across various demographics, then I’ll be convinced we’re facing an actual pandemic, rather than adhering to the directives of elites who stand to gain from their mandates and suppressive actions.
This is excellent.
In 2019 the Brazilian Ministry of Defense established the:
ACADEMIC COOPERATION PROGRAM IN NATIONAL DEFENSE (PROCAD)
https://www.gov.br/defesa/pt-br/arquivos/ensino_e_pesquisa/defesa_academia/procad/2020/ap13a_gestaoa_ea_governancaa_ema_biosseguranca.pdf
The coordinator, Prof. Claudio Mafra, was in USA during 9/11. One of the PROCAD sponsors is:
Galveston National Laboratory of the University of Texas Medical Branch, EUA
https://www.utmb.edu/gnl/ https://www.utmb.edu/gnl/research/wrceva
which is part of the following network:
https://creid-network.org/network-map
You will notice that PERU, ECUADOR and MANAUS, in Brazil, were early covid outbreak sites in April of 2020.
My piece from today also support the conclusion that there was/is no "deadly" virus.
If this novel virus was deadly, there would be at least one or two people who worked at the public health agencies who died from the virus, right? I don't know of any public health employee anywhere in America who died from Covid.
https://billricejr.substack.com/p/how-many-employees-at-public-health?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2
I, for one, got pretty sick (tested positive, unvaxxed) in 2021/22 (? it's hazy) but hadn't had a flu shot in years.
It was gnarlier than any flu I had ever had. That said, if my primary doctor had been more responsive (i.e not a branch covidian) it would have been easier. I had to go to a functional doctor after enduring a week long fever and bronchitis to get steroids and some other things to help. It took a little less than a couple of months to fully recover my strength and lung capacity. I did have a cool husky voice for a while. However, I have had only one minor sniffle since than time so I ain't complaining about my choices.
Regardless of the existence of a novel coronavirus, if people had been adequately treated for ANY severe respiratory infection, this would have been no different than any other time. IMO denial of standard treatments i.e. steroids, antibiotics etc.. combined with horrible protocols, stress-inducing societal measures and mRNA transfections worked together to create all the additional misery, suffering and death we have seen.
Hypoxemic patients presenting at hospitals as I recall were only 10-15% as one might expect in a bad "flu" year. They could have been treated with HBOT but that EUA request was denied by the FDA by mid 2020.
By the time the hype from the Imperial College of London modeler made its media inroad based on faulty data the plandemic funded by Bill Gates became well established. See the $$$ trail from him to the Imperial College of London. When I saw the money trail I was furious. He was in on this manipulation too with the Steering Committee at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Remember Event 201?
This might help
https://thecovidchronicles.substack.com/p/happy-anniversary-c63
https://chemtrails.substack.com/p/hospital-caught-stockpiling-dead
Individual brief outbreaks, NYC, N Italy. Photo ops. We have discussed this. Men with briefcases. Multiplicity.
Multiplicity.
Do not get caught flat-footed.
Trans:
Many Things At Once.
I believe, I do, that Kary Mullis had something to say about that. Mebbe jes lil ol me.
Yessum. They was.
Of Fear.