10 Comments

An interesting Haiti connection involves this qualitative study by Kevin Bardosh & colleagues. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953623004331, which I've commented on previously (e.g., https://x.com/Wood_House76/status/1679826465158823936 and https://x.com/Wood_House76/status/1693250263597957326)

There are many places around the world (and in America) where a "pandemic" simply didn't occur because citizens ignored, didn't know about, or refused to participate in it.

On the whole, those aren't the people I'm thinking of in the above essay who "enjoyed" or don't see as evil with actions the U.S. government took in early 2020. People who rejected all of it as a farce from the very beginning don't have to be convinced that what happened was evil.

Expand full comment

Bravo. This is a terrific perspective on human experience and point of view. Your bullet points are devastating.

Expand full comment

“ What’s hard to handle is how well-meaning, rule-following people like Joe Average mistook for these evils for social and scientific “goods”. I’ve realized that getting millions of compliant, go-with-the flow-Joes to see, let alone say out loud, “Yes, all of that was destructive & wrong, whatever the intentions,” is a lot harder than getting people to say hijackers and their accomplices were villains of the worst kind.”

Bingo.

Expand full comment

Typo? Scan for “like Joe Average mistook for these evils for” – should the first “for” be deleted?

==

Very thoughtful; but my thoughts are not collecting very well just now, so I will tell a story, re-tell a joke actually.

(One of my problems here is that in my context people have just about stopped telling stories about Sept 11 and that story-telling cessation seems to be much accelerated with “the pandemic” – is that because The Rulers are getting better at these ops? - the technology – it is that – has gotten so much better?)

Oh right – my joke: - a riff on your “the Human Rights Heist of 2020” – there was this guy named Faust – who had an opportunity to sell his soul to the devil in exchange for – the 19C version goes – the grant of unlimited knowledge and pleasure. (We would, of course, update that: swap in wealth for knowledge.) As a result – in short – all hell breaks loose.

The anti-Faust version goes: Faust gets home that evening and tells his wife what a great day he’s had: “I now have the capacity to gain unlimited knowledge” – and with a gleam in his eye but also thinking ahead he continues – “and pleasure too!” “All I had to do was sell my soul to some guy” … he stops, looks puzzled, and concludes: “I just don’t get it, what’s the catch?”

Expand full comment

Fixed the typo, thank you.

Regarding 9/11 storytelling, what you're saying is different from my experience. "Where were you on 9/11?" is akin to the "Where were you when Kennedy was shot?" question. It's not going away anytime soon. In the past year alone, I can think about at least 5 times when I've had a face-to-face conversation around that "where were you?" 9/11 question.

Re: technology - much like in a Greek or Shakespearean tragedy, the very technologies that officials & agencies use to manipulate will be their undoing.

I appreciate a good Faust joke. :)

FWIW, since 2020, I associate "Faust" less with the German legend and more with Jeremy Faust. https://x.com/jeremyfaust?lang=en

Expand full comment

You were at some distance on 9/11? I was 20 miles due west from "Ground Zero" (odd, how that term got recycled); can't think of the number of times I heard people say in the following 10 days: "It was like a *movie*!" to register their sense of heightened immediacy of experience. So, naturally, "where were you on 9/11?" is current for now - but asked in a context not too different than "did you see?" this or that movie. Has anyone queried your take on the "mini-nukes" vs "directed energy" controversy? Entirely different questions as are - I dunno - "lab leak?" vs "did all those people really die in NYC in Mar Apr 2020? "

Expand full comment

"Has anyone queried your take on the 'mini-nukes' vs 'directed energy' controversy?"

I'm not sure what this is referring to.

Expand full comment

We were talking about Sept 11 - and the current landscape of discussion in our social circles. Those who find the official conspiracy theory absurd (Arab teenagers flying aluminum jumbo jets into the towers) - have discussed alternative explanations to account for the massive, steel reinforced concrete structures being reduced to dust. Two of those are mini-nuclear charges being implanted in the structures or DEW - directed energy weapon - used to destroy the buildings.

Expand full comment

I don't have an opinion on the causes and players involved in 9/11.

Expand full comment

I like that - perfectly acceptable stance. You are focused and doing important work.

(Hello) - I have some catching up to do Woodhouse-wise; pleased to be a (comment enabled) subscriber; one of my computers insists that I am not.

Expand full comment