41 Comments

I love the way you put the data together in a straight no-frills manner. These are *basic* questions that point to a glaring lack of evidence to support the official narrative.

They’ll never cop to it—they’re in neck deep. One day, everyone will realize the enormity of the lies.

Keep going. Thank you for your work!

Expand full comment

Thank you! The silence is deafening for sure.

There’s more in the works....stay tuned!

Expand full comment

This is great. Keep trying. They think we're all that stupid ... when only 75 percent of us are that obtuse. They also know you're the only person in the world asking these questions (Well, I've been asking the same type questions too.) Per the official narrative, we had "late spread" - but only in a few cities. And, for some reason, the virus did suddenly become much more contagious and lethal ... in April ... after the cold and flu season. The fact the excess mortality spiked through the roof 21 to 25 days AFTER the lockdowns (lockdowns designed to prevent or slow "spread") ... is some kind of crazy coincidence.

Expand full comment

Yes, they know.

Follow the bodies....

Expand full comment

I recently examined "excess death" numbers in Michigan in April 2020 and compared them to death numbers before the lockdowns. There was zero excess deaths through March 14 and 71 percent excess mortality a couple of weeks later. Huh? How in the heck is that even possible?

https://billricejr.substack.com/p/something-doesnt-add-up?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2

Expand full comment

It's not.

The key is this: County, Place of Death, Age.

Expand full comment

Here is a classic quote from Covid Con Job early days:

"I was not necessarily surprised by the number, the number of total positives, but rather it was the number of people who were positive that were not showing symptoms at all," said Dr. Danny Avula, the public health director for Richmond, Virginia.

Uh, so what do you think Dr. Danny that maybe the people who 'aren't sick', aren't sick?

Maybe just possibly the test that's telling you these 'not sick' people are sick is bullshit?

Expand full comment

Hey Jessica did you see amazing polly's elmhurst video (or were you the one who linked it? i can't keep track :)

https://www.bitchute.com/video/cAnSkQojE_4/

dr colleen smith who made a video there as basis for an infamous ny times psy-op piece claimed to be on staff there but wasn't

she specialized in medical simulations at nyu , hmmm.....

the video shows ventilators just sitting there in the hospital corridor, unpacked. when they were supposedly in short supply

was it a line of crisis actors in her video who were waiting to get tested? the hospital was deserted and unguarded 4 days later

patients with stomach problems or car accident survivors were being scanned for “signs” of covid and categorized as such

the video also has a clip of trump reading a propaganda script about refrigerated trucks full of bodies at elmhurst, as if he had been there to see them

and on 3/24 cuomo was screaming for ventilators but when confronted said that hospitals didn;'t hem yet because “we haven't reached the apex yet” - what did he know that we didn't? kind of like him talking about the 26K death figures early on...

VIDEO from nyt Article: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bE68xVXf8Kw

Dana Ashlie's #FilmYourHospital compilation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5pIMD1enwd4

Expand full comment

I have, yes. Polly did a nice job raising questions in real time about it.

My thread is here: https://x.com/EWoodhouse7/status/1689832360114520064?s=20

Expand full comment

thanks! for those not on twitter https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1689832360114520064.html

Expand full comment

I have to be honest I am not quite following what you are saying. Lots of "it wasn't this, it wasn't that" but not much "it was THIS!". Please for the sake of the hard of comprehending like me, could you do an executive summary of your negative case and your positive case? Would be appreciated!

Expand full comment

I am first and foremost continuing to say that they need to substantiate the death curve with death certificates and other proof, because it doesn’t make sense on multiple fronts.

The timing, scale, and magnitude of their curve doesn’t work -- especially the the number of hospital deaths and sheer number of bodies.

This is an inquiry, and I’m posting different things as I go. I suggest watching/listening to me for a fuller view.

https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/presentations-and-interviews

Expand full comment

Many thanks Jessica.

Expand full comment

thank you

Expand full comment

Thank you.

Expand full comment

The medical care is what killed them. ventilators and Remdesivir and then isolation and denial of nutrition and fluids.

Expand full comment

We don't have the data to support allegations about vents or Remdesvir.

That's not to say these weren't factors - I've said elsewhere that they were - but people have to realize that it's the ALL CAUSE death curve, first and foremost, that is unsubstantiated.

Did 37K+ people die in those 11 weeks?

More specifically, did the number of people claimed to have died on each day die on those days, in the places claims?

Expand full comment

37k in 11 weeks is about 480 per day. What is the total mortuary capacity in New York? There was plenty of fear porn in the media but I do not recall piles of bodies in New York. Twenty folks dying per hour for 11 weeks leaves a lot of bodies. Where are they?

Expand full comment

Exactly

But the bodies don’t average like that. Bulk occurred in 4-5 weeks.

Moreover, consider the claim about hospitals deaths https://x.com/ewoodhouse7/status/1705747671288279381?s=46

To be blunt, I’m calling the bluff on this curve.

I don’t think they have the bodies to substantiate this having occurred.

Doesn’t mean the deaths are made up tho.

There are other fraud possibilities.

My guess is that something will be disclosed within the next 6 months to a year that says there was an “error” of some kind -- which will be a garbage excuse.

Expand full comment

You think that there was not the 37,000 deaths. IE their lying about that too.

Expand full comment

"spread with no impact"

Bear in mind we do not know, and will quite likely never know, the initial case numbers for Wuhan city, Wuhan province, and the region. So the first visible appearance in areas with tight scientific-commercial connections to China - Iran and Northern Italy - makes a certain amount of sense.

Not to disagree with the rest of your objections to the narrative (insofar as I understand those objections).

Expand full comment

My views aren’t dependent on Wuhan anything.

My central claim is that there is no evidence of a suddenly spreading novel deadly coronavirus leaked from a single point.

Expand full comment

Got it. Thanks again.

Expand full comment

Southern Italy actually has more workers from China, I’m told, than Northern Italy.

IMO, the US govt has told zero truths about COVID.

Expand full comment

The Tuscany region of Italy has a greater concentration of Chinese foreign workers (mainly garment industry) than Milan, Bergamo etc. (N Italy).

There were no cases or "Covid deaths" in the Tuscany region (even putting aside problems with PCR) whatsoever in Spring 2020. As well no cases or deaths in Southern Italy.

The theory of Chinese workers transmitting "Covid" in N Italy doesn't hold water.

I can provide that data for you if interested.

The issues surrounding Tehran are also fabricated.

Expand full comment

Yes, we agree on Italy and Iran. Both farcical and part of the staging. Which isn’t to say deaths were faked

I have the Italy death for all provinces. Is that what you mean?

Expand full comment

I'm not saying deaths were faked in N Italy I'm saying that the causes in Spring 2020 were multi-factorial- mainly due to prexisiting conditions such as high rates of lung cancer, high rates of air pollution (2nd worst air quality in Europe), asbestos problems, glyphosate poisoning due to atrocious agricultural sector, mass water pollution due to hog farming practices, aging population, etc..

All of this then ignited by mass hysteria campaign, national lockdowns and of course public health despotism forcing deadly protocols on mainly the fragile elderly.

Oh and the experimental quadrivalent flu vaccines in 2019 and the meningcoccal (sp?) vaccine campaign.

I'm sure we could add a few more to the list- unique viral pathogen isn't one of them.

Expand full comment

I know you’re not saying faked.

I think people are still misunderstanding what I’m saying could happen with all cause deaths that renders the data fraudulent.

We agree about iatrogenesis. The question is whether even all of those factors can account for the daily death curves that are claimed to have occurred.

Do the curves show deaths that occurred in real time?

Expand full comment

Typo:

"A pathogen leaked, jumped, and/or escaped from Wuhan, China, and “spread” person to person with lightening speed..."

This should be "lightning" not "lightening"

Expand full comment

You're the best editor! Thanks!!

Expand full comment

And this: “This is especially true when comparing to the 2017-2018 flu season, which was severe morality-wise.” Mortality-wise? While there are important (fraud) morality issues in this story, flu season is not one of them.

Expand full comment

It's already clear that the virus didn't come from Wuhan. There was no trace of it in China before September, 2019, by which time it was endemic in Northern Europe and the USA.

2%-4% of Americans were Covid seropositive in December, 2019 and multiple, lab-certified cases have been found from that period.

The first certified Covid death was in Kansas, not Wuhan.

By mid-2020, evolutionary biologists were convinced that the virus was most likely to have escaped in the USA, host to the richest variety of viral strains.

Refusal by US authorities to share pulmonary lavage samples from 'vaping' deaths (after the Mayo Clinic exonerated vaping) was absolute and infuriated international scholars.

Expand full comment

Yes, I’m aware of all of this and have done related threads on twitter.

What I infer that we differ on, perhaps, is the importance and relevance of SARS-CoV-2, its relationship to COVID-19, the meaning of COVID (and whether it’s an actual acronym, versus the abbreviation Tedros explained on Feb 11, 2020), and whether a novel coronavirus or sudden spread thereof caused deaths in spring 2020.

Expand full comment

Related to the vaping deaths, as I’m sure you're aware, WHO issued ICD codes for COVID-19 and Vaping-Related Illness on the same day (April 1, 2020). Both are under the U codes.

Expand full comment

.

Promote More Fear - Not Less

The Vaccinated Took The Shots

Because They Were Afraid Of " Some New Virus "

- You Wiil Not Make Them Less Fearful. And Have Not.

So Make Them More Fearful Of - SOMETHING ELSE

Make Them Terrified Of Suffering From The Shots

- Like Everyone Else Who Already Has.

This Isn't Hard Folks. Taunt Them Unrelentingly.

.

Expand full comment

You know I have to just throw this out here, so you know how they kept driving the narrative of how dangerous Covid was to the elderly and people with co-morbidities and such? I can’t help thinking in sometime in spring early 2020, when people were being encouraged to get their yearly flu vaccines might be significant here. Especially for the elderly and people with poor immune health. I just find it odd that those very people are also many of the ones who suddenly tested positive for Covid, then suddenly needed ventilators, many sadly didn’t make it out of the hospitals alive. Could it be those flu vaccines weren’t to fend off the flu but to make people have a lapse in immune function basically causing them to be walking, talking, breathing, and contagious disease incubators. Idk just a thought. Also remember how there was a shortage of ventilators across the country? Yet truck drivers back then we’re waiting in lines at dump facilities unloading pallet after pallet of brand new unused ventilators... seems like much is still lurking in the shadows about this ninja virus!

Expand full comment

Do you have a comparable graph of the respiratory deaths in NYC to display the 2017/2018 flu mortality for the same months displayed for the 2020 graph in your article. Curious as to if mortality comes to a ‘peak’ or if it’s staggered over several months.

Expand full comment

See the first graph. It begins in January 2018

Expand full comment

Yeah. It would be important to know if they actually killed all those people in the graphed "spikes" or just faked the numbers! We know the hospitals were far emptier than they said, the tents were barely used, the quickly prepared facility wasn't used, and the hospital ship wasn't used!

Expand full comment

They wouldn’t have to “fake” numbers as it make up death certificates that aren’t attached to people who died.

The much simpler thing would be to move death certificates from deaths that occurred at other times outside the excess period

Expand full comment