While the authors of the review focused on scientific flaws in the testing protocol, they did not address Corman et al.'s reliance on social media reports about a SARS-like virus being detected.
The review positioned itself as an evaluation of the paper, identifying the first "fatal flaw" as the test's reliance on theoretical sequences provided by a laboratory in China. I am not a PCR expert, but if one or more of the scientists on the Corman-Drosten paper really did rely on social media reports for their "seek & find" endeavour, it seems THAT is first fatal flaw. And if they didn't, they lied.
At a minimum, Corman et al. should be required to cite their sources and clarify their methodology regarding these reports.
As someone who did PCR back in the early 90’s, I was amazed to find out how quickly they developed the CD test, submitted it for peer review and had it accepted. So I was pleased to read the critique paper above and thought it raised valid points. However, I have been dismayed to see one of the review’s authors, Kevin McKernan, whole heartedly embrace the commercial PCR test. Were the complaints Kevin laid out in the review regarding the protocol resolved to his satisfaction? If so, when and how?
McKernan is not the only critique author hanging on to PCR.
My guess as to why it is difficult for some to disavow the technology (and genomics) is because arguments regarding the harms/inefficacy of the COVID shot are rooted in/rely on data that defines SARS-CoV-2 infection as a positive test (and regards SC2 as a stable/circulating entity causative of a novel illness)
IMHO the great unfinished business of this whole debacle - the gaping hole that was left open, is the PCR. The notion that PCR can be used to “diagnose” communicable disease should have been resoundingly, thoroughly obliterated. Vaccine mandates came along and (rightly) consumed all of the attention. PCR was left with its reputation unscathed. It deserves equal vilification billing alongside mandates and mRNA technology because it is the driving mechanism of the madness.
We don’t need to see motives to see through fraudulent science…we can see it without motives…but wasn’t the financial/banking system going through some very intense stress in late 2019? Wasn’t it amazing to see the financial system problems vanish with the flood of new money into the system, justified by the “pandemic response”? Again, not necessary to mix finance and science to see scientific fraud, and motive not necessary to spot it either. Nonetheless it’s worth considering what it was it all about. Many economists have pointed it out, and I think it’s interesting enough to bring up again. Here’s one of many articles pointing to the economic problem in late 2019. ”too big to fail“ legislation was completely abandoned apparently.
BTW, just fyi, as I was looking at this again for the Tongji connection, that HongBaoChen Twitter account you show above is not the original HongBaoChen account that posted the tweet in question. Original appears to have been deleted and then a new account was created in November 2023 with the same handle. You can see the original account, replying to Peter Daszak also on 31 December 2019, here: https://archive.md/xqXYI. Scroll down to near the bottom of the archived page...
I need to give a shout out to Kevin McKernan and his colleagues who reported the totally fake covid PCR test back in Jan 2020 to the Med Twitter group. He is one of the authors on the Nov 2020 paper that you cite.
No, unfortunately, most of those tweets were deleted when Twitter blocked most of the Med Twitter accounts. (As happened to you.). Maybe Kevin has them still. You should contact him.
I just ran Grok looking for the tweets from back then, but they seem to be now missing. Jan 23 2020 Drosten published his super-surprising immediately available PCR test for Sars-2. Already being made and distributed by Charite. Kevin et al read the paper and severely critiqued it. The later Nov 2020 paper, of which he was a coauthor, captures alot of his comments from back then. I was stunned by this info which is why I remember it so clearly. Apparently, the tweets were removed since that time. But I am very grateful to Kevin for opening my eyes and mind at that crucial time in the scamdemic. -Laura
I find it extremely bizarre that the C-D review said nothing about the social media sourcing.
It's even more bizarre when seeing that Bobby M did mention it in the Twitter thread that was effectively a draft of the paper.
So, somewhere along the line, it was decided that the criticism was irrelevant or not important in relative terms
Even if we want to say "hindight is 2020," there is no super-charitable explaination for why the critique authors can't look back and say, "yeah, that IS weird and raises questions about sequencing tech and PCR tests."
Gratitude to Kevin M can be expressed without residual "halo effects" getting in the way of tough questions.
You are not implying any such thing, but I have battled that thinking on-and-offline for 2+ years. It's exhausting! :)
Back then, we were all being threatened and Kevin is CEO of a pcr testing company in Massachusetts. I assume he was told it would be severely harmed if he attacked their holy grail. MA was the HQ for the scam, even more so than DC. Walensky, Harvard, MIT, Pfizer, Moderna et al along with the CCP ran it from Boston. I was threatened and attacked back in 2011 when I filed complaint on Fauci and Wuhan. But I think Senator Grassley was protecting me, in the background, from ultimate demise. However, I don't think Kevin has any such guardian angels. -Laura
...and about Mass & the opioid epidemic (the latter because I consulted for awhile with a school district in Cape Cod and remember administrators talking about it and the national news coverage related to it)
Seems to be a lot of mafia-esque omerta going around...
First of all, one should say goodbye to the belief that there are so-called “pathogens” that trigger or cause diseases - then one must say goodbye to the belief in “biology” and its subspecies - and finally one must know that there have always been these fraudulent in vitro experiments with so-called “cell lines” (are chemical solutions and have absolutely nothing to do with cells) together with infinitely different toxic-chemical substances, reagents and precise instructions, which, if followed, lead to the desired result - and in order to talk people into this fraud (and thus keep the pharmaceutical industry running and generate profits), so-called “thermocyclers” and all kinds of software are then used to try to make this fraud visible in silico with “letter groups” = so-called designed “oligoprimers”! PCR-Tests" are always false!!!
And just by the way, there can be no so-called specific "immunity" or so-called "antibodies' because people are exposed to countless nanoparticles, environmental impacts/conditions and toxic materials/substances on a daily basis and the organism is so conceptualized that he can very good to cope with them in general - it only gets worse if you get toxins into the organism in larger quantities, so that it can no longer cope with the detoxification and there will be chronic, long-term diseases up to cancer and death! Being sick means keeping the organism healthy and if you give it time and support it with rest, plenty of fluids and light food, then it will not become a problem - and just by the way, these so-called "vaccines' are ALWAYS harmful and absolutely unnecessary because they are made with toxic chemicals, with nanoparticles and last time also with nanotechnology!
No one has ever isolated viruses, bacteria, phages, proteins, DNA, RNA, nucleotide, amino acids, etc. etc. - the whole so-called biology(with it subunits) is based on fraudulent experiments in vitro with the corresponding reagents, precise instructions, countless chemical aids and software(there is a separate software for everything), as well as so-called oligonucleotide primers/"letter groups" designed with the help of software - biology and virology is entirely a pseudoscience!!!
The definition of biology is - "Biology is the study of life and living organisms. It includes the study of their structure, function, growth, origin, evolution, and distribution."
But let's look at it with logical common sense:
First of all, it should be noted that so-called biology(molecular, microbiology) largely “lives/feeds” on these fraudulent experiments.
She is and will always be only a theory, assumption and hypothesis, since everything only takes place in vitro/in glass, corrugated plate/tubes, petri dishes etc., in chemically produced solutions - so-called “cell lines”/cell culture with other chemical substances and precise instructions and if you stick to it exactly you will get the desired result - this mixture is then dehydrated and solidified in paraffin wax, where nm-thin slices are cut, which are then viewed under a light microscope - now the results/images that you look at can be created by the chemical cell lines, but also dead cell debris of humans, animals or plants or even those of the interacting chemical substances, which in turn form their own minimal forms and structures. It starts with these fraudulent experiments and ends on the computer/software/tool, where a vast number of “letter groups” are already stored or you can also create them yourself/designing - none of this has anything to do with reality!!
It is logical, but not proven, that cells must die and renew themselves in order for humans to grow and live.
It's also logical that no one can know how a living organism, which ultimately forms a unit/system is supplied with blood, and has a function/process - but e.g. if even just one organ is affected by disease, or the organism is interfered with by an operation/incision, everything will simply change or the organism/system will die - all that can be said with certainty is the structure of the skeleton/anatomy, the individual organs in a dead state in pathology and any X-rays (but this is also not certain, as these rays alone, which are harmful, cause distortion...)!
There are of course various other ways of “looking inside” a living organism, such as sonography (abdominal, thyroid, echocardiography, vessels, uterus - and classic sonography offers no risks, as is the case with X-rays and computer tomography due to radiation), but it's not possible to determine how they works (and let's not forget that every person is unique)!
The so-called origin/evolution/distribution of life itself is, of course, also just conjecture, hypotheses and assumptions. One could eventually/perhaps say, it's a process of continuous branching and diversification from common trunks - people, animals, plants.
Adding on with individual comment:
In 2020, a group of experts submitted an external peer review of the Corman-Drosten paper to Eurosurveillance, analyzing the flaws RT-PCR test.
Unfortunately, their critique was rejected. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346483715_External_peer_review_of_the_RTPCR_test_to_detect_SARS-CoV-2_reveals_10_major_scientific_flaws_at_the_molecular_and_methodological_level_consequences_for_false_positive_results
While the authors of the review focused on scientific flaws in the testing protocol, they did not address Corman et al.'s reliance on social media reports about a SARS-like virus being detected.
The review positioned itself as an evaluation of the paper, identifying the first "fatal flaw" as the test's reliance on theoretical sequences provided by a laboratory in China. I am not a PCR expert, but if one or more of the scientists on the Corman-Drosten paper really did rely on social media reports for their "seek & find" endeavour, it seems THAT is first fatal flaw. And if they didn't, they lied.
At a minimum, Corman et al. should be required to cite their sources and clarify their methodology regarding these reports.
As someone who did PCR back in the early 90’s, I was amazed to find out how quickly they developed the CD test, submitted it for peer review and had it accepted. So I was pleased to read the critique paper above and thought it raised valid points. However, I have been dismayed to see one of the review’s authors, Kevin McKernan, whole heartedly embrace the commercial PCR test. Were the complaints Kevin laid out in the review regarding the protocol resolved to his satisfaction? If so, when and how?
McKernan is not the only critique author hanging on to PCR.
My guess as to why it is difficult for some to disavow the technology (and genomics) is because arguments regarding the harms/inefficacy of the COVID shot are rooted in/rely on data that defines SARS-CoV-2 infection as a positive test (and regards SC2 as a stable/circulating entity causative of a novel illness)
Hot mess, all of it https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/my-post-about-breakthrough-infections
IMHO the great unfinished business of this whole debacle - the gaping hole that was left open, is the PCR. The notion that PCR can be used to “diagnose” communicable disease should have been resoundingly, thoroughly obliterated. Vaccine mandates came along and (rightly) consumed all of the attention. PCR was left with its reputation unscathed. It deserves equal vilification billing alongside mandates and mRNA technology because it is the driving mechanism of the madness.
We don’t need to see motives to see through fraudulent science…we can see it without motives…but wasn’t the financial/banking system going through some very intense stress in late 2019? Wasn’t it amazing to see the financial system problems vanish with the flood of new money into the system, justified by the “pandemic response”? Again, not necessary to mix finance and science to see scientific fraud, and motive not necessary to spot it either. Nonetheless it’s worth considering what it was it all about. Many economists have pointed it out, and I think it’s interesting enough to bring up again. Here’s one of many articles pointing to the economic problem in late 2019. ”too big to fail“ legislation was completely abandoned apparently.
https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/notes/feds-notes/what-happened-in-money-markets-in-september-2019-20200227.html
Thanks.
I'm acquainted with the financial hypotheses
I spoke to motive recently here: https://open.substack.com/pub/woodhouse/p/motive-for-pandemic-casualty-event?r=jjay2&utm_medium=ios
BTW, just fyi, as I was looking at this again for the Tongji connection, that HongBaoChen Twitter account you show above is not the original HongBaoChen account that posted the tweet in question. Original appears to have been deleted and then a new account was created in November 2023 with the same handle. You can see the original account, replying to Peter Daszak also on 31 December 2019, here: https://archive.md/xqXYI. Scroll down to near the bottom of the archived page...
Thanks, we'll check this out.
See my posts last night and today:
https://x.com/Wood_House76/status/1957649423057453205
https://x.com/Wood_House76/status/1957787256212652227
Jessica et al,
I need to give a shout out to Kevin McKernan and his colleagues who reported the totally fake covid PCR test back in Jan 2020 to the Med Twitter group. He is one of the authors on the Nov 2020 paper that you cite.
Laura Kragie MD. biomedworks.substack.com
Thanks, Laura.
Do you have the text of what he said to the group -- and the date?
No, unfortunately, most of those tweets were deleted when Twitter blocked most of the Med Twitter accounts. (As happened to you.). Maybe Kevin has them still. You should contact him.
- Laura
Thanks. Kevin blocked me on X in 2023 or 2024 (can't recall which).
If anyone reading this is in touch w/him, they can reach out.
Laura, do you have the text of the message he sent? Thanks.
I just ran Grok looking for the tweets from back then, but they seem to be now missing. Jan 23 2020 Drosten published his super-surprising immediately available PCR test for Sars-2. Already being made and distributed by Charite. Kevin et al read the paper and severely critiqued it. The later Nov 2020 paper, of which he was a coauthor, captures alot of his comments from back then. I was stunned by this info which is why I remember it so clearly. Apparently, the tweets were removed since that time. But I am very grateful to Kevin for opening my eyes and mind at that crucial time in the scamdemic. -Laura
MANY people deleted tweets that would be helpful to see, as Twitter is a diary.
Drosten’s timeline comes up short too
Thanks.
I find it extremely bizarre that the C-D review said nothing about the social media sourcing.
It's even more bizarre when seeing that Bobby M did mention it in the Twitter thread that was effectively a draft of the paper.
So, somewhere along the line, it was decided that the criticism was irrelevant or not important in relative terms
Even if we want to say "hindight is 2020," there is no super-charitable explaination for why the critique authors can't look back and say, "yeah, that IS weird and raises questions about sequencing tech and PCR tests."
Gratitude to Kevin M can be expressed without residual "halo effects" getting in the way of tough questions.
You are not implying any such thing, but I have battled that thinking on-and-offline for 2+ years. It's exhausting! :)
Back then, we were all being threatened and Kevin is CEO of a pcr testing company in Massachusetts. I assume he was told it would be severely harmed if he attacked their holy grail. MA was the HQ for the scam, even more so than DC. Walensky, Harvard, MIT, Pfizer, Moderna et al along with the CCP ran it from Boston. I was threatened and attacked back in 2011 when I filed complaint on Fauci and Wuhan. But I think Senator Grassley was protecting me, in the background, from ultimate demise. However, I don't think Kevin has any such guardian angels. -Laura
Yep, I know a lot of the history.
...and about Mass & the opioid epidemic (the latter because I consulted for awhile with a school district in Cape Cod and remember administrators talking about it and the national news coverage related to it)
Seems to be a lot of mafia-esque omerta going around...
No sorry, 2020 was a long time ago...
Thanks
Fyi https://x.com/wood_house76/status/1958858039831736767?s=46
(Will prob become a substack post)
Retweeted it to all...
no pcr scam no ‘covid’ with its 99% case survival rate.
Flu rebranded almost 😉 ?
At the very beginning of this crime, there was an abstract that everyone could see right away that it was a criminal lie.
https://maryann255.substack.com/p/the-truth-is-always-on-the-other-20e
First of all, one should say goodbye to the belief that there are so-called “pathogens” that trigger or cause diseases - then one must say goodbye to the belief in “biology” and its subspecies - and finally one must know that there have always been these fraudulent in vitro experiments with so-called “cell lines” (are chemical solutions and have absolutely nothing to do with cells) together with infinitely different toxic-chemical substances, reagents and precise instructions, which, if followed, lead to the desired result - and in order to talk people into this fraud (and thus keep the pharmaceutical industry running and generate profits), so-called “thermocyclers” and all kinds of software are then used to try to make this fraud visible in silico with “letter groups” = so-called designed “oligoprimers”! PCR-Tests" are always false!!!
And just by the way, there can be no so-called specific "immunity" or so-called "antibodies' because people are exposed to countless nanoparticles, environmental impacts/conditions and toxic materials/substances on a daily basis and the organism is so conceptualized that he can very good to cope with them in general - it only gets worse if you get toxins into the organism in larger quantities, so that it can no longer cope with the detoxification and there will be chronic, long-term diseases up to cancer and death! Being sick means keeping the organism healthy and if you give it time and support it with rest, plenty of fluids and light food, then it will not become a problem - and just by the way, these so-called "vaccines' are ALWAYS harmful and absolutely unnecessary because they are made with toxic chemicals, with nanoparticles and last time also with nanotechnology!
https://www.labkey.com/antibody-discovery-software-biotechs/
https://antibody-software.com/
Conclusion:
No one has ever isolated viruses, bacteria, phages, proteins, DNA, RNA, nucleotide, amino acids, etc. etc. - the whole so-called biology(with it subunits) is based on fraudulent experiments in vitro with the corresponding reagents, precise instructions, countless chemical aids and software(there is a separate software for everything), as well as so-called oligonucleotide primers/"letter groups" designed with the help of software - biology and virology is entirely a pseudoscience!!!
The definition of biology is - "Biology is the study of life and living organisms. It includes the study of their structure, function, growth, origin, evolution, and distribution."
But let's look at it with logical common sense:
First of all, it should be noted that so-called biology(molecular, microbiology) largely “lives/feeds” on these fraudulent experiments.
She is and will always be only a theory, assumption and hypothesis, since everything only takes place in vitro/in glass, corrugated plate/tubes, petri dishes etc., in chemically produced solutions - so-called “cell lines”/cell culture with other chemical substances and precise instructions and if you stick to it exactly you will get the desired result - this mixture is then dehydrated and solidified in paraffin wax, where nm-thin slices are cut, which are then viewed under a light microscope - now the results/images that you look at can be created by the chemical cell lines, but also dead cell debris of humans, animals or plants or even those of the interacting chemical substances, which in turn form their own minimal forms and structures. It starts with these fraudulent experiments and ends on the computer/software/tool, where a vast number of “letter groups” are already stored or you can also create them yourself/designing - none of this has anything to do with reality!!
It is logical, but not proven, that cells must die and renew themselves in order for humans to grow and live.
It's also logical that no one can know how a living organism, which ultimately forms a unit/system is supplied with blood, and has a function/process - but e.g. if even just one organ is affected by disease, or the organism is interfered with by an operation/incision, everything will simply change or the organism/system will die - all that can be said with certainty is the structure of the skeleton/anatomy, the individual organs in a dead state in pathology and any X-rays (but this is also not certain, as these rays alone, which are harmful, cause distortion...)!
There are of course various other ways of “looking inside” a living organism, such as sonography (abdominal, thyroid, echocardiography, vessels, uterus - and classic sonography offers no risks, as is the case with X-rays and computer tomography due to radiation), but it's not possible to determine how they works (and let's not forget that every person is unique)!
The so-called origin/evolution/distribution of life itself is, of course, also just conjecture, hypotheses and assumptions. One could eventually/perhaps say, it's a process of continuous branching and diversification from common trunks - people, animals, plants.
https://maryann255.substack.com/p/the-fraud-with-the-thermal-cyclers
https://maryann255.substack.com/p/lets-come-to-the-so-called-bacteria
https://maryann255.substack.com/p/should-we-all-know-certain-information
https://maryann255.substack.com/p/replicons-no-nanobots-yes
https://maryann255.substack.com/p/what-we-know-even-if-this-is-repeatedly
https://maryann255.substack.com/p/the-truth-is-always-on-the-other-528
https://maryann255.substack.com/p/the-truth-is-always-on-the-other-610
etc. etc. etc.
Best regards to you all and your families!