I think it’s worthwhile to document what some well-known people who weren’t “on the ground” in New York City during the spring 2020 death spike event are saying about it now.
Most of the science and health naysayers continue to promote we were in the midst of a pandemic in 2020. They will criticise the origins and varied responses to the pandemic but never will they acknowledge the staged creation of the "Covid pandemic" 2020. There is very little opposition to the naysayers and it does not matter if they make accusations of the virus being intentionally tinkered with or created and not even if the response was grossly mismanaged as long as they keep the narrative of the pandemic alive. We have had every story imaginable about the staged pandemic of 2020 except that it was faked.
Pardon me here but I'm going to post a two-part comment with the opener that Risch, Woods, RFK, et al don't know jack about what happened in NYC because they have fastidiously and INTENTIONALLY AVOIDED looking into it. By NOT looking into it they can surmise and conjecture all day long and plenty of people will parrot whatever they say simply because they are individuals with an authoritative voice- even as they don't know anything about this event. This will create and/or solidify the narrative as it currently stands- which is a big fat lie.
For this comment I have purposefully omitted data fraud which is a very real possibility which should remain on the table.
Part One:
If all of the "Covid dissident", "freedom movement" celebs like RFK were to thoroughly investigate the events of NYC/N Italy etc. of Spring 2020 they would be forced to stop lying about there ever being a pandemic caused by some unique viral pathogen. RFK goes so far as to use N Italy to catapult his "galloping virus/spread" theory EVEN AS he admitted to NOT KNOWING what happened in N Italy, insane I know but he did all of this in the same interview. Yet ONLY because he is an authoritative voice is this blatant contradiction allowed to go unnoticed.
Put the events of NYC next to the Scottish Covid Inquiry (not to mention thousands of additional pieces of evidence and anecdotes and testimonies), next to the voluminous testimony from the UK, next to the concrete evidence for Italy and we know precisely what happened in Spring 2020. Mass murder in the hospitals. Easily accomplished- incentives and mandatory protocols.
All of that was used to create the perception that there was some illness "sweeping" through and killing people rather than the administrative slaughter being done by technocrats and medical professionals.
Given this it is easy to understand why "hero" doctors and nurses are running around hyperventilating (lying) about the "Covid war zones" and "they have never seen anything like it" and "they were overwhelmed" and on and on. Keeps people from seeing the brutal reality that these "medical messiahs" are in reality demons and allows these white coated dealers of death an escape hatch for their own conscience/dissonance if they even have one.
As for the iatrogenic deaths in early 2020 in the US- it was mainly midazolam (not just a UK thing), propofol, fentanyl, DNR's and neglect- as well as other types of hospital barbarism including vents/over oxygenation.
Also at-home deaths rose sharply as a result of the fear campaign and new policies that mandated emergency personnel NOT attend to patients as they had in the past. At- home cardiac arrest went way up as a result. Listed as "Covid deaths" of course.
Data on NY hospital medications used- note the massive uptick per patient of aforementioned drugs:
"Medication utilization in patients in New York hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic"
Does anyone have first hand reports of any intrepid NYC reporters calling hospitals or going into hospitals or being outside hospitals and getting first-hand reports? Of course not as journalism is dead.
What was the main motive for this global operation? That is not so difficult to assess given what we know of those involved in planning this operation and given what we witnessed during the Covid Operation and what are currently unfold seeing right before our eyes.
We’ve had a very clear example of how to fake a pandemic. Everyone who believes we really did have a pandemic are supporting the narrative that’s trying to eliminate most of us. And sadly that includes many in the so called medical freedom movement. It doesn’t matter if they’re well meaning, it’s just not helpful.
I reckon if we could get across to people that there’s no such thing as a pandemic that would be an excellent way of breaking the spell.
It seems like a lot of these doctors that questioned the lockdowns and vaccines keep on insisting that there was something new. I think they are susceptible to this because they have been brainwashed by their own field. Medical school reinforces rote memorization and following the book. Residency is like boot camp with limited sleep and crazy hours.
Of course he's gonna be clueless, like Pierre Kory.
Most of these doctors never even questioned vaccines until con-vid because they were stuck in believing the system while losing their own benefits as shitty insurance companies ate up their pay leading to doctors having only 15 minutes per patient and other stupid crap.
"The evolutionary psychologist William von Hippel found that humans use large parts of thinking power to navigate social world rather than perform independent analysis and decision making. For most people it is the mechanism that, in case of doubt, will prevent one from thinking what is right if, in return, it endangers one’s social status. This phenomenon occurs more strongly the higher a person’s social status. Another factor is that the more educated and more theoretically intelligent a person is, the more their brain is adept at selling them the biggest nonsense as a reasonable idea, as long as it elevates their social status. The upper educated class tends to be more inclined than ordinary people to chase some intellectual boondoggle. "
It's like how so many of them fall for the mRNA, pseudouridine, spike protein crap ignoring the fact that the nano lipids were found to be toxic years before con-vid, especially with multiple doses.
They fall for the sci fi bullshit... But at least Sasha questions pandemics and bioweapons. ( Though she thinks con-vid was a chemical weapon. )
These people are not clueless.Most knew what was happening and what they were doing. It was happening right in front of them on multiple occasions. It's CYA.
I don’t know if this has been addressed previously, but what about the undertakers? We’ve heard about how hospitals were stressed in NYC, but they also have ways of managing capacity. But there are only so many morticians, how could they have coped with a seven times increase in deaths in just a few weeks? There are always about as many people doing a job as needed, whether its dentists or mechanics, the market takes care of supply and demand.
So how could there possibly have been so much slack capacity? What about casket shortages?
My first thought was that 9/11 was a comparable event, but it’s not. There were about 3000 fatalities, but very few bodies were recovered. I don’t think there could have been a demand for mortuary personnel and space much beyond what was normal.
And unlike hospitals that deal with surges in demand in flu season, there is no experience that I know of that would enable the funeral system to deal with an immediate 7x increase in demand.
One of the Sherlock Holmes stories said:
"When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.”
Maybe there is some way that I just don’t know of that thousands of extra bodies can be given funerals and burials without a problem. But without knowing that, the improbable explanation is that at least some of the deaths were made up in order to hype the crisis.
Agreed - that’s why you’re the PHD and I’m a lowly engineer!
An actual crisis would not need to be hyped. I suspect that if if were not for hysterical media and opportunistic politicians, we would have just have been aware of an usually high number of nursing home deaths and people missing several days of work with a weird flu that often made them lose their sense of smell.
Why and how that was hyped is I believe the central mystery of our time, and the Great NYC Die-off one of the most baffling, along with why Fauci, etc flipped their advice on masks and how a miracle vaccine just happened to come along at the right time.
There’s an awful lot of parroting of narrative themes, even when the available data contradicts those themes. It either reflects ignorance or it is intentional distortion.
It is hard to speculate on motives, but the themes repeated here by Risch have nearly become tropes, repeated reflexively.
Time for all these guys to check the data and reassess. And that is being polite.
High flow forced ventilation on sedated and intubated patients was never a success. Few ever got off the vents Jessica. Texas took note and saw the majority of patients dying while vented.
ECMO was even worse with less than a 5% success outcome yet, yet the FDA did grant it an EUA despite less than 250 hospitals nationwide having that available.
Dr. Risch hypothesized that outpatients not being given oxygen and certain medicines contributed to hospitalizations and deaths. He did not address ventilators.
Again, this post is about the New York City event of spring 2020.
Talk to the RNs. I do know Texas did work on the vents and how badly they worked. But hey, GM and Ford made them for the government. Tens of thousands of them with your tax dollar.
As for HBOT. RFK jr. Book, The Real Anthony Fauci,noted the success of HBOT in the first 15 pages.
China switched to HBOT after seeing poor results on the vents. They were building and deploying in Wuhan multiplace chambers according to manufacturers on Alibaba in mid 2020.
It is not possible to lay out the multiple lines of acquisition and motives for the COVID-19 Operation in a single comment or even a single article. So here just a comment on one aspect.
Means-Motives-Methods
Consider Joel Smalley's recent article here and the one he links to within that article on Midazolam and Italy.
"Midazolam Murders - a Policy of Systemic Euthanasia in the UK"
One of the biggest problems facing the UK/EU is unfunded liabilities. The pension system is broke. How to make an immediate and large-scale impact on these unfunded liabilities while setting in motion numerous other long sought after policy objectives? Eliminate those who are creating the largest problems of unfunded liabilities. They would never do that would they? Some people are afraid to face these realities.
Cui Bono? Consider what is discussed here towards the end of the linked article.
"Why Italy?"
Italy also had the motivation which becomes apparent once you understand the Covid story through the lens of money, power, control, and wealth transfer.
A financially bankrupt country with a financial sector desperate for bailouts and a command structure run by central bankers made for a willing and compliant government.
For reasons unrelated to the poor health of its citizens Italy has been dubbed “the sick man in Europe” for the past decade by the EU financial sector.
Like much of Europe the Italian government was facing extreme economic pressures in 2019.
While Europe as a whole was economically stagnant Italy officially slipped into recession in early 2019. Anxieties in the Eurozone were high with concerns that the “Italian problem” would spread and trigger a meltdown across an already teetering global economy.
Italy’s government debt had mushroomed to the fourth-largest in the world and the biggest in the EU. This crushing debt was placing a strain on the EU creating tension between Rome and Brussels.
By May 2019 Italy’s financial crisis was said to be “posing major threats to the monetary targets of the European Central Bank” and if not reined in, “could shatter market confidence in the entire Euro area, putting the EU in big trouble.”
The predicted tsunami of financial collapse” staring European Central Bankers in the face came to a head in 2019.
With no time to spare, the tried and true bailout scheme was proposed in order to rescue large investors. European commissioner for economy, Paolo Gentiloni, warned “A whopping €1.5 trillion ($ 1.63 trillion) could be needed to “deal with this crisis.”
All chatter about the financial industry bankrupting the nation by looting public funds, politicians destroying public services at the behest of large investors and the depredations of the casino economy were washed away with the fresh telling of a crisis sparked by the ‘outbreak of Covid-19.’
Predators who saw their financial empires coming apart at the seams resolved to shut down society and loot the world in an attempt to salvage their crumbling financial empires.
In order not to solve the problems they created these financial predators needed a cover story.
A cover story big enough to disguise the countless financial crimes they committed and suppress the social problems they created.
That cover story magically appeared in the form of a “novel virus.”
Ultimately the European Central Bank (ECB) agreed to a €1.31 trillion ($1.46 trillion) bailout of European banks followed up by the EU agreeing to a €750 billion recovery fund for European states and corporations.
This fat package of “long-term, ultra-cheap credit to hundreds of banks” was sold to the public as a necessary and benevolent program to cushion the impact of the coronavirus pandemic on businesses and workers.
As part of the EU recovery plan the €750 billion was divided in two parts. One included €500 billion to be allocated as grants based on each country’s “recovery needs.” Italy would be getting the biggest slice of the pie.
Europe’s ‘sick man’ received a much needed infusion- strings attached.
I have always wondered why Italy was so hard hit. You’ve just connected another dot for me!
I have 2 friends who were stranded in Italy when lockdowns started and they were there for months before being allowed to leave. I think you’ve pinpointed exactly what occurred and why Italy was so “hard hit”. Interestingly, my friends saw very little evidence of a pandemic while they were stranded….hmmm!
“Hard hit” was the narrative, obviously, not the actuality. Just part of the fear-mongering to get everyone lined up and willing to hand over our freedoms.
Except there were multiple 'novel virus' hoaxes in the past couple of decades.
The motive was more to do with getting worldwide public acceptance of gene therapy via transfection. This apparently has been the goal since the advent of genetic engineering.
Absolutely- as I said it's not possible to cover all the lines of acquisition in a single comment. The acceptance/normalizing of the mRNA platform and all that that entails was a significant part of this operation and has been in the works for over a decade mainly due to the financial exigencies of the crumbling Pharma business empire.
I would add that public acceptance is but one part of THIS aspect of the Covid scam.
Agree completely Allen. Also it isn’t just for infectious diseases that the mRNA platform is believed ‘useful’. A multitude of other non infectious pathologies will be deemed ‘treatable’ with this tech, we know it originally came about as a cancer therapeutic. But why stop there? Cardiovascular disease, neurological disease, inherited disorders, all could ‘benefit’, anpparently. And there’s more, how about physiological processes? Why bother with the contraceptive pill if you can get a single mRNA jab that will keep you free from the fear of pregnancy. And extrapolating from all that, how about the transhumanist agenda, starting first with all those vulnerable individuals who have been told they were born in the wrong body, no need for any puberty blockers or cross sex hormones, just take the occasional jab, and you’ll get the body you desire/were brainwashed into believing you need. The mRNA platform, will be pushed because of the massive investment in it, and the ‘perceived’ endless opportunities to make money from it. I’ve been long concerned we were heading into a world where medication was going to become compulsory for us to access every day life, think no drivers licence, house/car/health/etc insurance, or education, ability to travel, access to banking facilities etc etc unless you’ve taken the right medication. The mRNA tech is perfect for this, and fulfils Jessica’s theory of ‘one shot to rule them all’. Also let’s not forget that a fair chunk of the population have handed over their genetic make up these last few years, not just from pcr tests, but the fad of finding out their ancestry, and the need to be a descendant of Rob Roy, Henry VIII, or other such noble historical figures. All grist for the disease finding mill of big pharma.
There are these enormous financial interests and the people whose financial empires are tied to this Industry are willing to do anything to protect and further those interests. The Vaccine Injury Compensation Program and the 1986 law substantially removes liability for manufacturers or anyone administering vaccines for the death and disability that’s caused by vaccines. But the vaccine has to be on the list.
So the industry has been making this aggressive shift away from whatever else they do and into the vaccine arena where they have limited liability. So there are all kinds of treatments- toxic "gene therapies" that are being developed, that are being called vaccines that have nothing to do with childhood infectious diseases.
There are vaccines under development for obesity, for cocaine addiction, for things you would never think of as having to do with a vaccine and if they can get it on the vaccine list they’ll have indemnity. The patents on a lot of the blockbuster drugs have recently run out or are running out and so they’re looking for another basket to put their eggs in and they’re putting it in the vaccine basket.
The "Covid" mRNA vaccines are just a door opener. The CDC has been saying for years already that they want to re-vaccinate every adult with all the childhood vaccines, but there are literally hundreds of new vaccines in development that are already at the FDA waiting for approval. There’s an enormous shift into the vaccine arena and away from other areas where the profits are not as big and the liability is still there.
So we'll see more and more kinds of vaccines developed, or things called vaccines that you would never think of as having anything to do with vaccines, so they can get into this no-liability arena. When possible they will try to get these "novel vaccines" on the childhood schedule which is guaranteed and subsidized money.
Every man, woman and child on the planet to be a recipient of vaccines from the moment of birth until the day they die- maybe even in the afterlife. There’s no limit to the number of vaccines, as far as the industry’s concerned, that any person can get at any stage and age in their life- every kid and every adult turned into human pin cushions for the Pharma Cartel.
One of the numerous aspects of the Covid Operation is to invent this new market for Pharmaceuticals.
It is impossible to underestimate the value that Pharma and the medical cartel bring to large financial investment firms. Pharmaceuticals and the "health management system" in the US is currently the largest sector of the US economy.
Dr. Risch is a well-credentialed, high-status individual at Yale University.
If he is "not up to speed" on something, then he can say something like, "I'm not sure but I think it warrants serious investigation because it doesn't really add up."
Dr Risch presents very plausible hypothesis of what could have happened. However, it appears these are presented somewhat off the top of his head. Given that he is obviously well informed, these are important remarks, but I didn’t see that he presented any data to support them. In fact, they tend to raise more questions, as you did.
I remember when New York City was in the covid spotlight and wondering why that wasn’t happening where I lived, and coming up with much less well informed speculation. I suspect he is doing something similar.
Assuming you're not blocked by Dr. Risch (he does have a public email), Ms. Jessica, perhaps you can appeal to him on his own terms (figuratively and literally) -- replacing/refining his terms "plausibility" and "science" with substitutes as you see fit that represent the dubious reports of the covid mass-fatality "bomb" (and so forth):
"Plausibility But Not Science Has Dominated Public Discussions of the Covid Pandemic"
Nov. 26, 2022 BY Harvey Risch
EXCERPTS:
Without debate, science is nothing more than propaganda.
Yet, one may ask, how has it been possible to present technical material to the American public, if not to the international public, for almost three years and achieve a general understanding that the matters were “scientific,” when in fact they were not? I assert that what has been fed to these publics through the traditional media over the course of the pandemic has largely been plausibility, but not science, and that both the American and international publics, as well as most doctors, and scientists themselves, cannot tell the difference. However, the difference is fundamental and profound.
Science starts with theories, hypotheses, that have examinable empiric ramifications. Nevertheless, those theories are not science; they motivate science. Science occurs when individuals do experiments or make observations that bear upon the implications or ramifications of the theories. Those findings tend to support or refute the theories, which are then modified or updated to adjust to the new observations or discarded if compelling evidence shows that they fail to describe nature. The cycle is then repeated. Science is the performance of empirical or observational work to obtain evidence confirming or refuting theories.
In general, theories tend to be plausible statements describing something specific about how nature operates. Plausibility is in the eye of the beholder, since what is plausible to a technically knowledgeable expert may not be plausible to a lay person.
...
Just like other forms of evidence, clinical evidence needs to be systematically collected, reviewed, and analyzed, to form a synthesis of clinical reasoning, which would then provide the clinical component of scientific medical evidence.
...
All other forms of empirical evidence are “potentially biased” and therefore unreliable. This is a plausibility conceit as I will show below.
But it is so plausible that it is routinely taught in modern medical education, so that most doctors only consider RCT evidence and dismiss all other forms of empirical evidence.
...
These information systems were created because the “plausibility” that randomization automatically makes study results accurate and unbiased was recognized as insufficient to cope with research chicanery and inappropriate investigator conflict-of-interest motives.
While these attempts to reform or limit medical research corruption have helped, misrepresentation of evidence under the guise of EBM [evidence-based medicine] persists.
...
During the Covid-19 pandemic, numerous other assertions of scientific evidence have been used to justify public health policies, including for the very declaration of the pandemic emergency itself. Underlying many of these has been the plausible but fallacious principle that the goal of public health pandemic management is to minimize the number of people infected by the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
...
[A]n obsessive, one-size-fits-all pandemic management scheme that did not distinguish risk categories was unreasonable and oppressive from the outset.
Accordingly, measures promoted by plausibility to reduce infection transmission, even had they been effective for that purpose, have not served good pandemic management. These measures however were never justified by scientific evidence in the first place....
This discussion makes clear that these actions supposedly interfering with virus transmission on the basis of plausibility arguments for their effectiveness have been both misguided for managing the pandemic, and unsubstantiated by scientific evidence of effectiveness in reducing spread. Their large-scale promotion has demonstrated the failure of public-health policies in the Covid-19 era.
Plausibility vs Bad Science
An argument could be entertained that various public-health policies as well as information made available to the general public have not been supported by plausibility but instead by bad or fatally flawed science, posing as real science.
...
Conclusions
Many other instances of plausible scientific claptrap or bad science have occurred during the Covid-19 pandemic. As was seen with the retracted Surgisphere papers, medical journals routinely and uncritically publish this nonsense as long as conclusions align with government policies. This body of fake knowledge has been promulgated at the highest levels, by the NSC, FDA, CDC, NIH, WHO, Wellcome Trust, AMA, medical specialty boards, state and local public health agencies, multinational pharma companies and other organizations around the world that have violated their responsibilities to the public or have purposely chosen not to understand the fake science.
...
Massive censorship by the traditional media and much of social media has blocked most public discussion of this bad and fake science. Censorship is the tool of the undefendable, since valid science inherently defends itself. Until the public begins to understand the difference between plausibility and science and how large the effort has been to mass-produce science “product” that looks like science but is not, the process will continue and leaders seeking authoritarian power will continue to rely on it for fake justification.
###
I give Dr. Risch major props for calling out the evidence-based-medicine scam/problem. IOW, I agree with him and give him a preponderance of credibility for his bucking the EBM school of "thought." Strangely, Jeffrey Tucker (and David Bell, etc), seems stuck in the middle of "to be evidence based (so-called)" or "not to be." The great and erudite Mr. Tucker also seems stuck between the establishment and the "alt-establishment" in his dogged quest for a "covid" "pandemic" reckoning ("establishment," either way).
For example (and sharing my insight as to, possibly, why he is tending not to pursue compelling evidence/reality, such as from you), he is pretty much stuck with the Great Barrington Declaration albatross. And his ongoing promotion of the likes of Kevin Bass, Dr. Jay, Atlas, Bret Weinstein, etc (mostly good people, especially on on a relative scale, I suppose) is a window into his positioning/thinking. I guess Mr. Tucker has chosen his "side" -- and you and your "side" aren't it/can't be it (if nothing else changes on his end).
As you've noted, it's precarious waters to rely on our heroes. I've become a bit disillusioned re Mr. Tucker, but I don't want to throw out the baby with the bathwater. Some days I want to herald him from the hilltops, and the next day I want to bonk him on his noggin. Can he be a pure (relatively speaking) arbiter of truth-seeking and truth as long as his "fellows" don't want to go there? Like I said, I fear that Jeffrey is stuck between a rock and hard place; it'll take A LOT of finesse for him (et al) to wriggle out of the GBD (which was always thin, but welcome-at-the-time, gruel) -- and other of his ideology/assumptions and relationships/affiliations.
One more "2"-second point that's related: Mr. Tucker (and his "clan") are wedded to the idea that "lockdowns" were NEVER prescribed in pandemic plans/pandemic preparedness (all hail Henderson, et al, circa 2006). This is facially untrue (I have the receipts, though I do not dismiss the possibility that I and/or others may be misunderstanding/quibbling amongst each other; I *am* vulnerable to "literalism"). I keep toying with the idea of writing this up (no small task), but so far I mostly stay out of the fray because I have "no" credentials, I'm anonymous, and I tend to be insecure about my contrary (though persistent) "gut" in the face of seemingly-estimable people ~mostly~ operating in good faith😛. It may sound like a platitude, but all I want is what is true; THAT is my agenda (and I am protecting no "rice bowl" other than, perhaps, my ego -- though honestly I doubt I'm even impelled by my ego).
Finally, I am not a follower of Woods at all, and his lack of follow-up inquiry with Dr. Risch seals the deal ("bros with shows").
It's difficult. Just trying to keep the options open. The timing of the 5G rollout is uncanny. Thinking there could be a perfect storm created. I follow jj Couey and agree with him and you. Nurse Erin was part of a sophisticated psyop with her military base in Florida. Just thinking multi-faceted event with corrupted data.
I know a local NYC Queens undertaker. Maybe he might have insight through his colleagues about all of the dead. Remind me again on the numbers and time period etc. Tnx.
It's fine to keep options open. It's not fine to keep repeating the same things with no apparent recognition of what I'm telling you. Accounts that do so tend to be interlopers & mis-directionists.
Yes, we've talked about the nurse Erin op and these other things you've mentioned. No, I'm not reminding you again of the numbers, which are already in other substack posts.
Funeral directors can provide insights about their individual experiences, which I suspect vary. Much like doctors and nurses in a hospital, they can only speak to what they saw/handled. There are news reports quoting directors saying they handled a lot of bodies. I'm sure others would say they handled the same as usual. It doesn't get the inquiry super far.
The U.S. government has made a claim about a mass casualty event. The onus is on them to prove it.
6 months is not long if there was a delay in implementation. Also the power can be increased in certain locations to 6G. Seems that's what happened in Wuhan.
Elmhurst is a pretty toxic location for ground water. I have excellent data. I investigated it. I can send it.
Verizon's 5G millimeter wave network will face perhaps its biggest coverage test yet when it launches in “parts of” New York City on September 26th. Today the carrier announced that 5G service will reach areas of uptown, midtown, and downtown Manhattan, along with select parts of Brooklyn, the Bronx, and Queens.Sep 19, 2019
If you examine the data, every flu pandemic arrives with each advancement with electricity.
1918 saw the erection of wireless communications in the military base in Kansas where the flu began. Rockefeller vaccines most like compounded the situation.
"Influenza" is not like the diseases from the late 19th century. No spread involved. But it was world wide due the the implementation of the EMF in numerous countries in the Empire at the same time. No contagion possible, just like Covid.
Why would you treat with more oxygen when it may have been a hemoglobin-destroying virus, destroying oxygen carriers in the blood -- such that no matter how much oxygen you add to the lungs, that oxygen could not be carried -- from lungs through blood stream to cells, tissues, organs? Witness NY ER doctor who said this looks like high altitude disease. And was "cancelled."
He was not canceled. On the contrary, his video was widely circulated and he was elevated by mainstream media outlets such as WebMD and The New York Times.
If they did take Kyle-Siddell seriously and follow through on the hematology vs pulmonology diagnosis, did they then stop prescribing ventilators as futile, since merely pumping oxygen into the lung organs would absolutely fail to get oxygen from lungs into the blood stream -- the hemoglobin oxygen carriers having been destroyed. See black toes and failed organs.
Also see the footnotes for the statement by Jonathan Engler that I wholeheartedly endorse. I mention this so that you're aware of the differences between your assumptions about COVID/SARS-CoV-2 and mine.
Most of the science and health naysayers continue to promote we were in the midst of a pandemic in 2020. They will criticise the origins and varied responses to the pandemic but never will they acknowledge the staged creation of the "Covid pandemic" 2020. There is very little opposition to the naysayers and it does not matter if they make accusations of the virus being intentionally tinkered with or created and not even if the response was grossly mismanaged as long as they keep the narrative of the pandemic alive. We have had every story imaginable about the staged pandemic of 2020 except that it was faked.
Corporate facism must be served.
Pardon me here but I'm going to post a two-part comment with the opener that Risch, Woods, RFK, et al don't know jack about what happened in NYC because they have fastidiously and INTENTIONALLY AVOIDED looking into it. By NOT looking into it they can surmise and conjecture all day long and plenty of people will parrot whatever they say simply because they are individuals with an authoritative voice- even as they don't know anything about this event. This will create and/or solidify the narrative as it currently stands- which is a big fat lie.
For this comment I have purposefully omitted data fraud which is a very real possibility which should remain on the table.
Part One:
If all of the "Covid dissident", "freedom movement" celebs like RFK were to thoroughly investigate the events of NYC/N Italy etc. of Spring 2020 they would be forced to stop lying about there ever being a pandemic caused by some unique viral pathogen. RFK goes so far as to use N Italy to catapult his "galloping virus/spread" theory EVEN AS he admitted to NOT KNOWING what happened in N Italy, insane I know but he did all of this in the same interview. Yet ONLY because he is an authoritative voice is this blatant contradiction allowed to go unnoticed.
Put the events of NYC next to the Scottish Covid Inquiry (not to mention thousands of additional pieces of evidence and anecdotes and testimonies), next to the voluminous testimony from the UK, next to the concrete evidence for Italy and we know precisely what happened in Spring 2020. Mass murder in the hospitals. Easily accomplished- incentives and mandatory protocols.
All of that was used to create the perception that there was some illness "sweeping" through and killing people rather than the administrative slaughter being done by technocrats and medical professionals.
Given this it is easy to understand why "hero" doctors and nurses are running around hyperventilating (lying) about the "Covid war zones" and "they have never seen anything like it" and "they were overwhelmed" and on and on. Keeps people from seeing the brutal reality that these "medical messiahs" are in reality demons and allows these white coated dealers of death an escape hatch for their own conscience/dissonance if they even have one.
As for the iatrogenic deaths in early 2020 in the US- it was mainly midazolam (not just a UK thing), propofol, fentanyl, DNR's and neglect- as well as other types of hospital barbarism including vents/over oxygenation.
Also at-home deaths rose sharply as a result of the fear campaign and new policies that mandated emergency personnel NOT attend to patients as they had in the past. At- home cardiac arrest went way up as a result. Listed as "Covid deaths" of course.
Data on NY hospital medications used- note the massive uptick per patient of aforementioned drugs:
"Medication utilization in patients in New York hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic"
https://academic.oup.com/ajhp/article/77/22/1885/5876487?login=false
Does anyone have first hand reports of any intrepid NYC reporters calling hospitals or going into hospitals or being outside hospitals and getting first-hand reports? Of course not as journalism is dead.
What was the main motive for this global operation? That is not so difficult to assess given what we know of those involved in planning this operation and given what we witnessed during the Covid Operation and what are currently unfold seeing right before our eyes.
We’ve had a very clear example of how to fake a pandemic. Everyone who believes we really did have a pandemic are supporting the narrative that’s trying to eliminate most of us. And sadly that includes many in the so called medical freedom movement. It doesn’t matter if they’re well meaning, it’s just not helpful.
I reckon if we could get across to people that there’s no such thing as a pandemic that would be an excellent way of breaking the spell.
It seems like a lot of these doctors that questioned the lockdowns and vaccines keep on insisting that there was something new. I think they are susceptible to this because they have been brainwashed by their own field. Medical school reinforces rote memorization and following the book. Residency is like boot camp with limited sleep and crazy hours.
Of course he's gonna be clueless, like Pierre Kory.
Most of these doctors never even questioned vaccines until con-vid because they were stuck in believing the system while losing their own benefits as shitty insurance companies ate up their pay leading to doctors having only 15 minutes per patient and other stupid crap.
"The evolutionary psychologist William von Hippel found that humans use large parts of thinking power to navigate social world rather than perform independent analysis and decision making. For most people it is the mechanism that, in case of doubt, will prevent one from thinking what is right if, in return, it endangers one’s social status. This phenomenon occurs more strongly the higher a person’s social status. Another factor is that the more educated and more theoretically intelligent a person is, the more their brain is adept at selling them the biggest nonsense as a reasonable idea, as long as it elevates their social status. The upper educated class tends to be more inclined than ordinary people to chase some intellectual boondoggle. "
-Sasha Latypova
Tangent, but Sasha Latapova doesn't believe Pierre Kory is clueless. Quite the opposite.
She does fall into the educated class.... 😂
It's like how so many of them fall for the mRNA, pseudouridine, spike protein crap ignoring the fact that the nano lipids were found to be toxic years before con-vid, especially with multiple doses.
They fall for the sci fi bullshit... But at least Sasha questions pandemics and bioweapons. ( Though she thinks con-vid was a chemical weapon. )
I think it goes beyond brainwashing.
These people are not clueless.Most knew what was happening and what they were doing. It was happening right in front of them on multiple occasions. It's CYA.
I don’t know if this has been addressed previously, but what about the undertakers? We’ve heard about how hospitals were stressed in NYC, but they also have ways of managing capacity. But there are only so many morticians, how could they have coped with a seven times increase in deaths in just a few weeks? There are always about as many people doing a job as needed, whether its dentists or mechanics, the market takes care of supply and demand.
So how could there possibly have been so much slack capacity? What about casket shortages?
I'm working on corroborating through data and personal accounts related to those things.
Besides what you're wondering about, how did they keep such an increase in dead bodies from public view?
My first thought was that 9/11 was a comparable event, but it’s not. There were about 3000 fatalities, but very few bodies were recovered. I don’t think there could have been a demand for mortuary personnel and space much beyond what was normal.
And unlike hospitals that deal with surges in demand in flu season, there is no experience that I know of that would enable the funeral system to deal with an immediate 7x increase in demand.
One of the Sherlock Holmes stories said:
"When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.”
Maybe there is some way that I just don’t know of that thousands of extra bodies can be given funerals and burials without a problem. But without knowing that, the improbable explanation is that at least some of the deaths were made up in order to hype the crisis.
I agree with everything you said except the end, which presumes there was a crisis. :)
Rather than "hype the crisis," I would say "create the crisis."
As to made-up deaths, that is but one avenue for fraud https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/the-f-word
Agreed - that’s why you’re the PHD and I’m a lowly engineer!
An actual crisis would not need to be hyped. I suspect that if if were not for hysterical media and opportunistic politicians, we would have just have been aware of an usually high number of nursing home deaths and people missing several days of work with a weird flu that often made them lose their sense of smell.
Why and how that was hyped is I believe the central mystery of our time, and the Great NYC Die-off one of the most baffling, along with why Fauci, etc flipped their advice on masks and how a miracle vaccine just happened to come along at the right time.
LOL. We are all equals in this mess. No special or higher degrees required. As they say, "PhD = knowing everything about nothing."
Remember, "flu season" was coming to a close in March 2020.
There’s an awful lot of parroting of narrative themes, even when the available data contradicts those themes. It either reflects ignorance or it is intentional distortion.
It is hard to speculate on motives, but the themes repeated here by Risch have nearly become tropes, repeated reflexively.
Time for all these guys to check the data and reassess. And that is being polite.
He did state "failure to use oxygen"
High flow forced ventilation on sedated and intubated patients was never a success. Few ever got off the vents Jessica. Texas took note and saw the majority of patients dying while vented.
ECMO was even worse with less than a 5% success outcome yet, yet the FDA did grant it an EUA despite less than 250 hospitals nationwide having that available.
Dr. Risch hypothesized that outpatients not being given oxygen and certain medicines contributed to hospitalizations and deaths. He did not address ventilators.
Again, this post is about the New York City event of spring 2020.
We don't have the data to claim that ventilator use is largely responsible for the staggering toll. https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/we-still-dont-know-how-many-people
Talk to the RNs. I do know Texas did work on the vents and how badly they worked. But hey, GM and Ford made them for the government. Tens of thousands of them with your tax dollar.
As for HBOT. RFK jr. Book, The Real Anthony Fauci,noted the success of HBOT in the first 15 pages.
https://www.physiciansweekly.com/mortality-rate-of-covid-19-patients-on-ventilators/
China switched to HBOT after seeing poor results on the vents. They were building and deploying in Wuhan multiplace chambers according to manufacturers on Alibaba in mid 2020.
You're not reading or understanding anything I'm writing
Part Two: Motive
It is not possible to lay out the multiple lines of acquisition and motives for the COVID-19 Operation in a single comment or even a single article. So here just a comment on one aspect.
Means-Motives-Methods
Consider Joel Smalley's recent article here and the one he links to within that article on Midazolam and Italy.
"Midazolam Murders - a Policy of Systemic Euthanasia in the UK"
https://metatron.substack.com/p/midazolam-murders-a-policy-of-systemic
Consider the correlation in the link provided here for NYC:
"Medication utilization in patients in New York hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic"
https://academic.oup.com/ajhp/article/77/22/1885/5876487?login=false
Consider the Scottish Inquiry- go here:
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/
One of the biggest problems facing the UK/EU is unfunded liabilities. The pension system is broke. How to make an immediate and large-scale impact on these unfunded liabilities while setting in motion numerous other long sought after policy objectives? Eliminate those who are creating the largest problems of unfunded liabilities. They would never do that would they? Some people are afraid to face these realities.
Cui Bono? Consider what is discussed here towards the end of the linked article.
"Why Italy?"
Italy also had the motivation which becomes apparent once you understand the Covid story through the lens of money, power, control, and wealth transfer.
A financially bankrupt country with a financial sector desperate for bailouts and a command structure run by central bankers made for a willing and compliant government.
For reasons unrelated to the poor health of its citizens Italy has been dubbed “the sick man in Europe” for the past decade by the EU financial sector.
Like much of Europe the Italian government was facing extreme economic pressures in 2019.
While Europe as a whole was economically stagnant Italy officially slipped into recession in early 2019. Anxieties in the Eurozone were high with concerns that the “Italian problem” would spread and trigger a meltdown across an already teetering global economy.
Italy’s government debt had mushroomed to the fourth-largest in the world and the biggest in the EU. This crushing debt was placing a strain on the EU creating tension between Rome and Brussels.
By May 2019 Italy’s financial crisis was said to be “posing major threats to the monetary targets of the European Central Bank” and if not reined in, “could shatter market confidence in the entire Euro area, putting the EU in big trouble.”
The predicted tsunami of financial collapse” staring European Central Bankers in the face came to a head in 2019.
With no time to spare, the tried and true bailout scheme was proposed in order to rescue large investors. European commissioner for economy, Paolo Gentiloni, warned “A whopping €1.5 trillion ($ 1.63 trillion) could be needed to “deal with this crisis.”
All chatter about the financial industry bankrupting the nation by looting public funds, politicians destroying public services at the behest of large investors and the depredations of the casino economy were washed away with the fresh telling of a crisis sparked by the ‘outbreak of Covid-19.’
Predators who saw their financial empires coming apart at the seams resolved to shut down society and loot the world in an attempt to salvage their crumbling financial empires.
In order not to solve the problems they created these financial predators needed a cover story.
A cover story big enough to disguise the countless financial crimes they committed and suppress the social problems they created.
That cover story magically appeared in the form of a “novel virus.”
Ultimately the European Central Bank (ECB) agreed to a €1.31 trillion ($1.46 trillion) bailout of European banks followed up by the EU agreeing to a €750 billion recovery fund for European states and corporations.
This fat package of “long-term, ultra-cheap credit to hundreds of banks” was sold to the public as a necessary and benevolent program to cushion the impact of the coronavirus pandemic on businesses and workers.
As part of the EU recovery plan the €750 billion was divided in two parts. One included €500 billion to be allocated as grants based on each country’s “recovery needs.” Italy would be getting the biggest slice of the pie.
Europe’s ‘sick man’ received a much needed infusion- strings attached.
https://21stcenturywire.com/2023/03/07/italy-2020-inside-covids-ground-zero-in-europe/
I have always wondered why Italy was so hard hit. You’ve just connected another dot for me!
I have 2 friends who were stranded in Italy when lockdowns started and they were there for months before being allowed to leave. I think you’ve pinpointed exactly what occurred and why Italy was so “hard hit”. Interestingly, my friends saw very little evidence of a pandemic while they were stranded….hmmm!
Hard hit by...?
:)
My theory is Iatrogenic democide plus fraud.
I don't think the all-cause curves for spring 2020 presented by official data are showing us real-time events.
“Hard hit” was the narrative, obviously, not the actuality. Just part of the fear-mongering to get everyone lined up and willing to hand over our freedoms.
https://healthfreedomdefense.org/italy-2020-the-preposterous-pandemic/
Except there were multiple 'novel virus' hoaxes in the past couple of decades.
The motive was more to do with getting worldwide public acceptance of gene therapy via transfection. This apparently has been the goal since the advent of genetic engineering.
100%
Absolutely- as I said it's not possible to cover all the lines of acquisition in a single comment. The acceptance/normalizing of the mRNA platform and all that that entails was a significant part of this operation and has been in the works for over a decade mainly due to the financial exigencies of the crumbling Pharma business empire.
I would add that public acceptance is but one part of THIS aspect of the Covid scam.
On that point here's a comment I made in 2022:
https://khmezek.substack.com/p/mrna-madness-its-only-just-begun/comment/11495427
Agree completely Allen. Also it isn’t just for infectious diseases that the mRNA platform is believed ‘useful’. A multitude of other non infectious pathologies will be deemed ‘treatable’ with this tech, we know it originally came about as a cancer therapeutic. But why stop there? Cardiovascular disease, neurological disease, inherited disorders, all could ‘benefit’, anpparently. And there’s more, how about physiological processes? Why bother with the contraceptive pill if you can get a single mRNA jab that will keep you free from the fear of pregnancy. And extrapolating from all that, how about the transhumanist agenda, starting first with all those vulnerable individuals who have been told they were born in the wrong body, no need for any puberty blockers or cross sex hormones, just take the occasional jab, and you’ll get the body you desire/were brainwashed into believing you need. The mRNA platform, will be pushed because of the massive investment in it, and the ‘perceived’ endless opportunities to make money from it. I’ve been long concerned we were heading into a world where medication was going to become compulsory for us to access every day life, think no drivers licence, house/car/health/etc insurance, or education, ability to travel, access to banking facilities etc etc unless you’ve taken the right medication. The mRNA tech is perfect for this, and fulfils Jessica’s theory of ‘one shot to rule them all’. Also let’s not forget that a fair chunk of the population have handed over their genetic make up these last few years, not just from pcr tests, but the fad of finding out their ancestry, and the need to be a descendant of Rob Roy, Henry VIII, or other such noble historical figures. All grist for the disease finding mill of big pharma.
You nailed it.
There are these enormous financial interests and the people whose financial empires are tied to this Industry are willing to do anything to protect and further those interests. The Vaccine Injury Compensation Program and the 1986 law substantially removes liability for manufacturers or anyone administering vaccines for the death and disability that’s caused by vaccines. But the vaccine has to be on the list.
So the industry has been making this aggressive shift away from whatever else they do and into the vaccine arena where they have limited liability. So there are all kinds of treatments- toxic "gene therapies" that are being developed, that are being called vaccines that have nothing to do with childhood infectious diseases.
There are vaccines under development for obesity, for cocaine addiction, for things you would never think of as having to do with a vaccine and if they can get it on the vaccine list they’ll have indemnity. The patents on a lot of the blockbuster drugs have recently run out or are running out and so they’re looking for another basket to put their eggs in and they’re putting it in the vaccine basket.
The "Covid" mRNA vaccines are just a door opener. The CDC has been saying for years already that they want to re-vaccinate every adult with all the childhood vaccines, but there are literally hundreds of new vaccines in development that are already at the FDA waiting for approval. There’s an enormous shift into the vaccine arena and away from other areas where the profits are not as big and the liability is still there.
So we'll see more and more kinds of vaccines developed, or things called vaccines that you would never think of as having anything to do with vaccines, so they can get into this no-liability arena. When possible they will try to get these "novel vaccines" on the childhood schedule which is guaranteed and subsidized money.
Every man, woman and child on the planet to be a recipient of vaccines from the moment of birth until the day they die- maybe even in the afterlife. There’s no limit to the number of vaccines, as far as the industry’s concerned, that any person can get at any stage and age in their life- every kid and every adult turned into human pin cushions for the Pharma Cartel.
One of the numerous aspects of the Covid Operation is to invent this new market for Pharmaceuticals.
It is impossible to underestimate the value that Pharma and the medical cartel bring to large financial investment firms. Pharmaceuticals and the "health management system" in the US is currently the largest sector of the US economy.
Primary is the financial incentives that he neglects.
He may be just not up to speed.
His mentioning the military was encouraging.
Dr. Risch is a well-credentialed, high-status individual at Yale University.
If he is "not up to speed" on something, then he can say something like, "I'm not sure but I think it warrants serious investigation because it doesn't really add up."
Dr Risch presents very plausible hypothesis of what could have happened. However, it appears these are presented somewhat off the top of his head. Given that he is obviously well informed, these are important remarks, but I didn’t see that he presented any data to support them. In fact, they tend to raise more questions, as you did.
I remember when New York City was in the covid spotlight and wondering why that wasn’t happening where I lived, and coming up with much less well informed speculation. I suspect he is doing something similar.
It's been four years. :)
Something can be plausible yet entirely incorrect.
Assuming you're not blocked by Dr. Risch (he does have a public email), Ms. Jessica, perhaps you can appeal to him on his own terms (figuratively and literally) -- replacing/refining his terms "plausibility" and "science" with substitutes as you see fit that represent the dubious reports of the covid mass-fatality "bomb" (and so forth):
https://brownstone.org/articles/plausibility-but-not-science-has-dominated-public-discussions-of-the-covid-pandemic/
"Plausibility But Not Science Has Dominated Public Discussions of the Covid Pandemic"
Nov. 26, 2022 BY Harvey Risch
EXCERPTS:
Without debate, science is nothing more than propaganda.
Yet, one may ask, how has it been possible to present technical material to the American public, if not to the international public, for almost three years and achieve a general understanding that the matters were “scientific,” when in fact they were not? I assert that what has been fed to these publics through the traditional media over the course of the pandemic has largely been plausibility, but not science, and that both the American and international publics, as well as most doctors, and scientists themselves, cannot tell the difference. However, the difference is fundamental and profound.
Science starts with theories, hypotheses, that have examinable empiric ramifications. Nevertheless, those theories are not science; they motivate science. Science occurs when individuals do experiments or make observations that bear upon the implications or ramifications of the theories. Those findings tend to support or refute the theories, which are then modified or updated to adjust to the new observations or discarded if compelling evidence shows that they fail to describe nature. The cycle is then repeated. Science is the performance of empirical or observational work to obtain evidence confirming or refuting theories.
In general, theories tend to be plausible statements describing something specific about how nature operates. Plausibility is in the eye of the beholder, since what is plausible to a technically knowledgeable expert may not be plausible to a lay person.
...
Just like other forms of evidence, clinical evidence needs to be systematically collected, reviewed, and analyzed, to form a synthesis of clinical reasoning, which would then provide the clinical component of scientific medical evidence.
...
All other forms of empirical evidence are “potentially biased” and therefore unreliable. This is a plausibility conceit as I will show below.
But it is so plausible that it is routinely taught in modern medical education, so that most doctors only consider RCT evidence and dismiss all other forms of empirical evidence.
...
These information systems were created because the “plausibility” that randomization automatically makes study results accurate and unbiased was recognized as insufficient to cope with research chicanery and inappropriate investigator conflict-of-interest motives.
While these attempts to reform or limit medical research corruption have helped, misrepresentation of evidence under the guise of EBM [evidence-based medicine] persists.
...
During the Covid-19 pandemic, numerous other assertions of scientific evidence have been used to justify public health policies, including for the very declaration of the pandemic emergency itself. Underlying many of these has been the plausible but fallacious principle that the goal of public health pandemic management is to minimize the number of people infected by the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
...
[A]n obsessive, one-size-fits-all pandemic management scheme that did not distinguish risk categories was unreasonable and oppressive from the outset.
Accordingly, measures promoted by plausibility to reduce infection transmission, even had they been effective for that purpose, have not served good pandemic management. These measures however were never justified by scientific evidence in the first place....
This discussion makes clear that these actions supposedly interfering with virus transmission on the basis of plausibility arguments for their effectiveness have been both misguided for managing the pandemic, and unsubstantiated by scientific evidence of effectiveness in reducing spread. Their large-scale promotion has demonstrated the failure of public-health policies in the Covid-19 era.
Plausibility vs Bad Science
An argument could be entertained that various public-health policies as well as information made available to the general public have not been supported by plausibility but instead by bad or fatally flawed science, posing as real science.
...
Conclusions
Many other instances of plausible scientific claptrap or bad science have occurred during the Covid-19 pandemic. As was seen with the retracted Surgisphere papers, medical journals routinely and uncritically publish this nonsense as long as conclusions align with government policies. This body of fake knowledge has been promulgated at the highest levels, by the NSC, FDA, CDC, NIH, WHO, Wellcome Trust, AMA, medical specialty boards, state and local public health agencies, multinational pharma companies and other organizations around the world that have violated their responsibilities to the public or have purposely chosen not to understand the fake science.
...
Massive censorship by the traditional media and much of social media has blocked most public discussion of this bad and fake science. Censorship is the tool of the undefendable, since valid science inherently defends itself. Until the public begins to understand the difference between plausibility and science and how large the effort has been to mass-produce science “product” that looks like science but is not, the process will continue and leaders seeking authoritarian power will continue to rely on it for fake justification.
###
I give Dr. Risch major props for calling out the evidence-based-medicine scam/problem. IOW, I agree with him and give him a preponderance of credibility for his bucking the EBM school of "thought." Strangely, Jeffrey Tucker (and David Bell, etc), seems stuck in the middle of "to be evidence based (so-called)" or "not to be." The great and erudite Mr. Tucker also seems stuck between the establishment and the "alt-establishment" in his dogged quest for a "covid" "pandemic" reckoning ("establishment," either way).
For example (and sharing my insight as to, possibly, why he is tending not to pursue compelling evidence/reality, such as from you), he is pretty much stuck with the Great Barrington Declaration albatross. And his ongoing promotion of the likes of Kevin Bass, Dr. Jay, Atlas, Bret Weinstein, etc (mostly good people, especially on on a relative scale, I suppose) is a window into his positioning/thinking. I guess Mr. Tucker has chosen his "side" -- and you and your "side" aren't it/can't be it (if nothing else changes on his end).
As you've noted, it's precarious waters to rely on our heroes. I've become a bit disillusioned re Mr. Tucker, but I don't want to throw out the baby with the bathwater. Some days I want to herald him from the hilltops, and the next day I want to bonk him on his noggin. Can he be a pure (relatively speaking) arbiter of truth-seeking and truth as long as his "fellows" don't want to go there? Like I said, I fear that Jeffrey is stuck between a rock and hard place; it'll take A LOT of finesse for him (et al) to wriggle out of the GBD (which was always thin, but welcome-at-the-time, gruel) -- and other of his ideology/assumptions and relationships/affiliations.
One more "2"-second point that's related: Mr. Tucker (and his "clan") are wedded to the idea that "lockdowns" were NEVER prescribed in pandemic plans/pandemic preparedness (all hail Henderson, et al, circa 2006). This is facially untrue (I have the receipts, though I do not dismiss the possibility that I and/or others may be misunderstanding/quibbling amongst each other; I *am* vulnerable to "literalism"). I keep toying with the idea of writing this up (no small task), but so far I mostly stay out of the fray because I have "no" credentials, I'm anonymous, and I tend to be insecure about my contrary (though persistent) "gut" in the face of seemingly-estimable people ~mostly~ operating in good faith😛. It may sound like a platitude, but all I want is what is true; THAT is my agenda (and I am protecting no "rice bowl" other than, perhaps, my ego -- though honestly I doubt I'm even impelled by my ego).
Finally, I am not a follower of Woods at all, and his lack of follow-up inquiry with Dr. Risch seals the deal ("bros with shows").
It's difficult. Just trying to keep the options open. The timing of the 5G rollout is uncanny. Thinking there could be a perfect storm created. I follow jj Couey and agree with him and you. Nurse Erin was part of a sophisticated psyop with her military base in Florida. Just thinking multi-faceted event with corrupted data.
I know a local NYC Queens undertaker. Maybe he might have insight through his colleagues about all of the dead. Remind me again on the numbers and time period etc. Tnx.
It's fine to keep options open. It's not fine to keep repeating the same things with no apparent recognition of what I'm telling you. Accounts that do so tend to be interlopers & mis-directionists.
Yes, we've talked about the nurse Erin op and these other things you've mentioned. No, I'm not reminding you again of the numbers, which are already in other substack posts.
Funeral directors can provide insights about their individual experiences, which I suspect vary. Much like doctors and nurses in a hospital, they can only speak to what they saw/handled. There are news reports quoting directors saying they handled a lot of bodies. I'm sure others would say they handled the same as usual. It doesn't get the inquiry super far.
The U.S. government has made a claim about a mass casualty event. The onus is on them to prove it.
6 months is not long if there was a delay in implementation. Also the power can be increased in certain locations to 6G. Seems that's what happened in Wuhan.
Elmhurst is a pretty toxic location for ground water. I have excellent data. I investigated it. I can send it.
There were numerous protests already in Wuhan about air quality, I suspect Bari Italy too.
Nice sick locations.
You keep repeating the same things on many of my substack posts, with no indication that you are processing anything I am saying in response
It appears you're making arguments similar to those Stephanie Seneff was making in April 2020 -and going do in a manner that simply "spams."
ALL of the pandemic preparedness plans across the world were torn into strips & used as bum fodder. Why?
Verizon's 5G millimeter wave network will face perhaps its biggest coverage test yet when it launches in “parts of” New York City on September 26th. Today the carrier announced that 5G service will reach areas of uptown, midtown, and downtown Manhattan, along with select parts of Brooklyn, the Bronx, and Queens.Sep 19, 2019
2019 ?
No excess death til after March 16, 2020
If you examine the data, every flu pandemic arrives with each advancement with electricity.
1918 saw the erection of wireless communications in the military base in Kansas where the flu began. Rockefeller vaccines most like compounded the situation.
"Influenza" is not like the diseases from the late 19th century. No spread involved. But it was world wide due the the implementation of the EMF in numerous countries in the Empire at the same time. No contagion possible, just like Covid.
Why would you treat with more oxygen when it may have been a hemoglobin-destroying virus, destroying oxygen carriers in the blood -- such that no matter how much oxygen you add to the lungs, that oxygen could not be carried -- from lungs through blood stream to cells, tissues, organs? Witness NY ER doctor who said this looks like high altitude disease. And was "cancelled."
Hi.
Cameron Kyle-Siddell is the Doctor you're referring to; I linked a video to him showing alarming levels of oxygen in my post above.
I do not consider him a genuine "whistleblower." https://x.com/Wood_House76/status/1689839292573528064
He was not canceled. On the contrary, his video was widely circulated and he was elevated by mainstream media outlets such as WebMD and The New York Times.
Hi Jessica,
If they did take Kyle-Siddell seriously and follow through on the hematology vs pulmonology diagnosis, did they then stop prescribing ventilators as futile, since merely pumping oxygen into the lung organs would absolutely fail to get oxygen from lungs into the blood stream -- the hemoglobin oxygen carriers having been destroyed. See black toes and failed organs.
A rhetorical question.
There is no indication that anything "stopped" in New York City hospitals with regard to ventilator use.
Cameron's video was published on March 31, 2020.
The state's dataset on ICU COVID intubation starts the day after the CARES Act was passed.
I suggest reading this article to understand better what we can and can't say about ventilators being responsible for the staggering NYC hospital inpatient death toll. https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/we-still-dont-know-how-many-people
Also see the footnotes for the statement by Jonathan Engler that I wholeheartedly endorse. I mention this so that you're aware of the differences between your assumptions about COVID/SARS-CoV-2 and mine.
Thanks.