I will email you, but I'm going to respond here to what you've said, for the record and the benefit of my readers:
1) Shannon was speaking for more than 30 seconds before the Senator said he couldn't hear anyone talking. Even 5 seconds would be a lot of dead time. Are you suggesting that staffers, including yourself, were sitting in a room with him for that long and did not prompt him to say he couldn't hear if anyone was speaking?
2) Even 3 seconds is enough time for a staffer to enter my Twitter handle, see exactly who I am, what my focus is, and to advise him not to respond, etc. It doesn't matter if that's what occurred; we can all easily imagine it occurring. Moreover, I have been critical of Senator Johnson, and of Pierre Kory and Nicole Sirotek (two of the Senator's favored "frontline" professionals who were sent to/went to New York City after the peak of the biggest mass casualty event those hospitals ever experienced). Given that staff were in the room, it is not unreasonable to interpret the Senator's long silence as intentional, even if it wasn't.
3) The Senator could hear Scarlett Johnson, who very briefly summarized what Shannon was saying, as "the COVID fraud in New York." While it's true, the conversation was quickly moved along, the Senator did not react to what Ms. Johnson said - and easily could have, i.e., "Ok. Shannon, I'm sorry I couldn't hear you. Please reach out to my staff."
4) I'm glad you are sure the Senator is interested in learning more and I will definitely give him ways to do that when I email you. I live in Chicagoland and am free to come to Madison or D.C. anytime. Given the Senator's history of platforming those who were injured (and worse) by the COVID shot, I would expect him to be extremely interested in evidence that raises questions about the federal government's claim that New York City experienced the mortality equivalent of ten World Trader Center disasters in a very short timeframe -- and has provided no proof the event occurred as presented. No doubt the Senator remembers very well that NYC was used to a) substantiate a pandemic/emergency declaration and b) "prove" to Americans "novel" deadly coronavirus was "spreading" from person to person and necessitated a shot.
Again, I appreciate you reaching out and will be in touch.
He does ma’am, and I promise you we were in the room and couldn’t hear. I know 30 seconds is dead space, but I promise we were trying to figure out why we couldn’t hear. Nowadays someone’s word doesn’t mean a lot, but I’m hoping you’ll take mine. I look forward to your email.
A U.S. Senator's word means less than nothing these days - and Senator Johnson is no exception. I don't know you but operate on a zero-trust policy at all times. I'm sure you understand why.
Whether you/we could hear isn't the issue. It's whether the Senator did and why he expressed zero interest in the idea of "COVID fraud in New York" as stated by Ms. Johnson.
@Chandler Rebel, not everyone is on Twitter, could you please update the senator’s website or other social media platforms, so everyone is able to read this exchange? Thank you
That is very odd. I’m at the point of distrusting almost everyone except a handful of people. One minute they make sense and the next minute they don’t, like McCullough now supporting the mRNA platform for immunizations. Insane. Nothing Johnson does would surprise me either.
SMH. Kory I don’t know about but minus hospital protocols he might have done a decent job in NY as many doctors would
have but they’re too well-groomed by big harma and $$$. Have you talked to Nicole Sirotek? I have no other way to link this except the Facebook version. She testified at Johnson’s early hearing but she seem to do her own thing. Haven’t keep track of her lately . May 2020: https://fb.watch/5-ftvCNBxj/
Kory was so unprofessional and dismissive in the last intvw in which I heard him that it's difficult to believe nearly anything he says. And the way he jumped around from state to state, hosp to hosp during CV19 is quite suspicious.
I saw the videos of Dr Kory answering questions about his work in New York early in the pandemic.
His answers to the questions were perfectly sane and reasonable, although he did express some frustration about the nature and tone of a few of them (some of the questions sounded argumentative, more like those of a prosecutor questioning a hostile witness than a search for answers).
He repeatedly said something important…. He was actually there treating patients. He reported what he saw and what he heard from others, patients, doctors and nurses.
He said that he saw no indication that the sudden deaths in NYC were caused by anything other than Covid.
And he also said something to the effect of ‘I don’t know what the data shows, but I was there treating real people who were sick with Covid’.
It’s entirely possible for there to be something wrong with the NYC death numbers without a doctor in the field noticing it.
Good point. He would have to had a active medical license in any state he was actually treating patients (even in a consultative capacity). So does he have a NY State Medical License or did he at the time in question.? Worth asking/checking.
I cannot find the article where I saw it last night. It was late and people were pushing back on the idea that yes, maybe THIS mRNA was bad but it was potential in development of future shots. It felt like a major sellout. Still searching…
Greg, I think that is the one. I am diligent about checking dates on papers but clearly missed that this is nearly a year old. One would hope he finds mRNA shots unacceptable for healthy humans at this point. Thank you for posting this!
Agree completely. Dr. McCullough has been heroic in his efforts to combat the globalists and educate the public about Covid and has done so at great personal cost. But like all of us, he's not perfect. If I recall correctly, he was still getting flu shots in 2021. He has more recently changed his view about flu shots and has become skeptical about vaccines more generally. Like you, I hope his view of the mRNA platform also has changed with time. His more recent favorable commentary about statins is particularly troubling. I hope at some point he'll review and address the almost universally negative reaction from his readers about his statin posts. He clearly knows the mRNA Covid shots are extraordinarily harmful and he knows Big Pharma has corrupted the medical journals, but it appears he doesn't fully appreciate the scope of the corruption or that it predates Covid by decades. I suspect that if he dives into statins like he has Covid, he'll no longer be touting them.
Agree about the statins. Convinced a family member to get off them who was just taking them as a precaution. Who does that? I’ll tell you who: doctors. They love drugs and have absolutely no sense. 😂
In recent days, he did publish a couple of things supportive of statins. Is it possible that's what you saw and not something about mRNA. (I was surprised and disappointed about the statin stuff -- I'm convinced by overwhelming medical research they try to censor that there are serious, debilitating toxic effects associated with statins and no real benefits.)
lol! Exactly! Katherine Watt and Sasha L said they had similar experiences with Senator Johnson. They sent their findings in writing with no response. My personal opinion is that the fall out will be worse for those who pretend to be white hats in this.
I wrote a long letter to Ron Paul at least wo years ago, sent it to his house (have a mutual friend) begging him to get in touch with Jonathan Couey and got zero response. Unreal.
What?!? How the heck did he flip like that? That’s insane, it’s not like the safety profile improved in the last couple years nor was additional research done.
Zero-trust policy* is best, especially when it comes to people you don't know and connect with in real life. (By IRL, I mean face to face, not Zoom to Zoom):
*Never trust, always verify - however, I oppose this concept as applied to government using it to deny or place pre-requisites around civil liberties
The connections and investors in this company are astounding, wild and beyond belief. VERY STRANGE BEDFELLOWS indeed. The founders' bios are particularly disturbing. There are some previous ones also regarding the founder of TWC attacking Polly for her investigations.
I do not necessarily agree with all she has to say but her ability to not only connect the dots (but find the dots and follow the money is quite illuminating.
I have begun to sour on all this freedom movement shit.
It has become a huge business. They cannibalize one another if they are not promoting one another. The biggest names we assumed were honest investigators may not be all they are cracked up to be.
As for the senators (esp. Rand Paul and Johnson) -- they have narrowly and studiously avoided any deep, serious analysis of emerging data on all fronts. I think the Fauci vs Paul circus was just a major decoy-distraction. I sure fell for it for a long time. I no longer believe Wuhan was the epicenter of the bioweapon.
Exactly. Almost count them on one hand and I followed Jessica way back when she was on Twitter (when you could and not actually have an account) as Woodhouse and Yeadon was Yardley and JJ was just on YT on his bike. Kept me sane and firmly in the control group.
"The point I'm making for the listeners is this isn't just all you know pie in the sky science these concepts are being applied to some therapies and the therapies I've mentioned so far are safe and effective so I don't want people listening to think that every single piece of RNA is bad that comes from a pharmaceutical company."
- P McCullough
The segment where McCullough speaks from 21:25 -23:25.
The full episode is only available to paid subscribers of Courageous Discourse™ with Dr. Peter McCullough & John Leake
He heard her alright but decided to turn a deaf ear. The subject is too much outside of the covid lane he has been put in and he will not dare stray from it, he has been paid to chair committees and it is the same script time after time, nothing changes and nothing moves forward.
He could hear her as he then referenced her ‘Shannon’ by name.
Also if he happened to get her name from the screen, he would have been able to see the purple volume monitor under her name moving, to know that someone was speaking.
His responses were perfectly timed when Shannon had completed her comment, if he couldn’t hear her then how would he know when to interrupt especially after the first comment.
NY being a fraud doesn’t align with his chosen narrative.
Keep going Jessica, you are right over the target!
I know the moment is lost, but if the goal is to make sure Johnson receives the message, or has the chance to hear it, Shannon (or you) could try calling his office.
Sometimes I wonder if you are on the same journey I was 15 years ago...at the end, you realize that they are all in on it. They control the official narrative. They control the opposition narratives.
It's the only conclusion.
They aren't unprepared, they are well-prepared to pretend they don't hear anything they cannot control.
You're being SPARed. Sage Hana has been talking this and Johnson for like a year now. I first clued into Johnson in Nov ‘22 on Twitter livestream with Malone and Johnson on it and possibly George Webb. Johnson got his ass handed to him because he refused to discuss the Monster in the room.
That livestream predated widespread knowledge of the OTA contract for MCMs not pharmaceutical products. Johnson was dissembling about the DoD being involved purely for logistics capabilities.
That brief audio is the most blatant example yet of "investigative" stonewalling/gaslighting/silencing. My God, surely he can't suppose his "I can't hear" is anything but transparent proof of his devious role in this theatre.
Were I obligated to bet my mortgage, given the subject matter and its being suppressed, and the knower of all truths would reveal the answer upon placing the wager...
I'd bet he could absolutely hear 7 days a week and twice on Sunday.
Sadly, we'll never know BUT he doesn't have that trick in his bag anymore.
Johnson served as Chairman of the Senate's Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee from 2015-2021 and is the ranking member for the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations.
You don't attain these positions by being a genuine "man of the people." You get these positions by being a reliable tool of the Empire and by being effective at MANAGING public opinion not by being concerned and responsive to it.
Or do you think he didn't hear her at all for ~35 seconds?
Also, do you have an explanation for why the Senator didn't say anything or try to say anything when another speaker summarized briefly? Would you expect a U.S. Senator to respond to each comment (or summary thereof) made in such a forum?
He could hear everyone, everyone could hear her. Except he couldn't hear her. He sat there for 35" in complete silence.
He's a part of a group of government officials who are notoriously corrupt.
He goes silent when corruption he is supposed to be investigating is brought up.
None of that rules out a technical problem but all of it should make any critical thinker at least question if there was something more.
In today's world, even if you just started seeing it a few years ago, it's unbelievably foolish to dismiss nefarious motives from *anyone*, especially a government official, when it comes to the Psyop.
Anyone who does dismiss it is either part of the Psyop or just plain dumb.
Another speaker that the Senator COULD hear briefly summarized. No reaction from the Senator. No interest in the topic and no "Shannon, I couldn't hear you, but please reach out to my staff and someone will respond."
Always concerned when a product is promoted. He mentions Dr. ROBERT YOUNG, who appears to be a straight shooter who paid his dues being arrested for healing cancer in a university in Cal.
I appreciate this follow-up. Thank you.
I will email you, but I'm going to respond here to what you've said, for the record and the benefit of my readers:
1) Shannon was speaking for more than 30 seconds before the Senator said he couldn't hear anyone talking. Even 5 seconds would be a lot of dead time. Are you suggesting that staffers, including yourself, were sitting in a room with him for that long and did not prompt him to say he couldn't hear if anyone was speaking?
2) Even 3 seconds is enough time for a staffer to enter my Twitter handle, see exactly who I am, what my focus is, and to advise him not to respond, etc. It doesn't matter if that's what occurred; we can all easily imagine it occurring. Moreover, I have been critical of Senator Johnson, and of Pierre Kory and Nicole Sirotek (two of the Senator's favored "frontline" professionals who were sent to/went to New York City after the peak of the biggest mass casualty event those hospitals ever experienced). Given that staff were in the room, it is not unreasonable to interpret the Senator's long silence as intentional, even if it wasn't.
3) The Senator could hear Scarlett Johnson, who very briefly summarized what Shannon was saying, as "the COVID fraud in New York." While it's true, the conversation was quickly moved along, the Senator did not react to what Ms. Johnson said - and easily could have, i.e., "Ok. Shannon, I'm sorry I couldn't hear you. Please reach out to my staff."
4) I'm glad you are sure the Senator is interested in learning more and I will definitely give him ways to do that when I email you. I live in Chicagoland and am free to come to Madison or D.C. anytime. Given the Senator's history of platforming those who were injured (and worse) by the COVID shot, I would expect him to be extremely interested in evidence that raises questions about the federal government's claim that New York City experienced the mortality equivalent of ten World Trader Center disasters in a very short timeframe -- and has provided no proof the event occurred as presented. No doubt the Senator remembers very well that NYC was used to a) substantiate a pandemic/emergency declaration and b) "prove" to Americans "novel" deadly coronavirus was "spreading" from person to person and necessitated a shot.
Again, I appreciate you reaching out and will be in touch.
He does ma’am, and I promise you we were in the room and couldn’t hear. I know 30 seconds is dead space, but I promise we were trying to figure out why we couldn’t hear. Nowadays someone’s word doesn’t mean a lot, but I’m hoping you’ll take mine. I look forward to your email.
A U.S. Senator's word means less than nothing these days - and Senator Johnson is no exception. I don't know you but operate on a zero-trust policy at all times. I'm sure you understand why.
Whether you/we could hear isn't the issue. It's whether the Senator did and why he expressed zero interest in the idea of "COVID fraud in New York" as stated by Ms. Johnson.
Thank you.
Please submit your questions and comments in your email to me and Senator said he will answer them on X.
Will do today. Thank you kindly.
@Chandler Rebel, not everyone is on Twitter, could you please update the senator’s website or other social media platforms, so everyone is able to read this exchange? Thank you
We remain hopeful the senator is compelled to act upon this extensive data that Jessica has gathered. We see a lot of talk but action has been scarce.
So did she get to try again?
If he was serious, he would want to know.
But we know he's just another war hawk and is playing a role.
That's why he does these stupid meetings instead of having the debate in Congress.
He is wholly unprepared for un-staged situations with citizens asking real questions.
So is Rand Paul.
So is every member of Congress.
So is Tucker Carlson.
et al
Unprepared or purposely ignoring the points they cannot talk about?
You would think that if they were just clueless, they would look into it.
I hope you're right, that they're just dummies 😂
Robert Malone chooses his panels.
That is very odd. I’m at the point of distrusting almost everyone except a handful of people. One minute they make sense and the next minute they don’t, like McCullough now supporting the mRNA platform for immunizations. Insane. Nothing Johnson does would surprise me either.
https://x.com/Wood_House76/status/1738014654461358520?s=20
https://x.com/Wood_House76/status/1762565766988116434?s=20
https://x.com/Wood_House76/status/1734442695794290699?s=20
https://x.com/Wood_House76/status/1734373129311453374?s=20
https://x.com/Wood_House76/status/1734455312860557701?s=20
SMH. Kory I don’t know about but minus hospital protocols he might have done a decent job in NY as many doctors would
have but they’re too well-groomed by big harma and $$$. Have you talked to Nicole Sirotek? I have no other way to link this except the Facebook version. She testified at Johnson’s early hearing but she seem to do her own thing. Haven’t keep track of her lately . May 2020: https://fb.watch/5-ftvCNBxj/
Kory was so unprofessional and dismissive in the last intvw in which I heard him that it's difficult to believe nearly anything he says. And the way he jumped around from state to state, hosp to hosp during CV19 is quite suspicious.
I saw the videos of Dr Kory answering questions about his work in New York early in the pandemic.
His answers to the questions were perfectly sane and reasonable, although he did express some frustration about the nature and tone of a few of them (some of the questions sounded argumentative, more like those of a prosecutor questioning a hostile witness than a search for answers).
He repeatedly said something important…. He was actually there treating patients. He reported what he saw and what he heard from others, patients, doctors and nurses.
He said that he saw no indication that the sudden deaths in NYC were caused by anything other than Covid.
And he also said something to the effect of ‘I don’t know what the data shows, but I was there treating real people who were sick with Covid’.
It’s entirely possible for there to be something wrong with the NYC death numbers without a doctor in the field noticing it.
Dont trust him
I need to see that video. Generally physicians aren licensed hop around all over so what was that about?!
Good point. He would have to had a active medical license in any state he was actually treating patients (even in a consultative capacity). So does he have a NY State Medical License or did he at the time in question.? Worth asking/checking.
NY suspended licensure requirements in the name of an emergency
Also, It would seem odd to simultaneously hold licenses in 2 states so geographically far apart. Wisconsin and NY.
Vid - if memory serves - was Kory's reply to Woodhouse & think she posted it a month or so ago on this SS. Good point @ licensing.
Thanks! He had some splainin’ to do
Just found the substack for her group (American Frontline Nurses), Dark Influence. https://open.substack.com/pub/darkinfluence2023/p/pharma-lobbyist-bio-paid-dem-linked?r=jhq3f&utm_medium=ios
I wasn't aware that McCullough is supportive of the mRNA platform. Can you provide a reference or some context?
I cannot find the article where I saw it last night. It was late and people were pushing back on the idea that yes, maybe THIS mRNA was bad but it was potential in development of future shots. It felt like a major sellout. Still searching…
Gaye -- I wonder whether this is the post by Dr McCullough you were remembering. He cites a published paper for the proposition that while the mRNA Covid injections were a disaster, the mRNA platform may have utility in other circumstances. https://open.substack.com/pub/petermcculloughmd/p/the-novelty-of-mrna-viral-vaccines?r=p8hrl&utm_medium=ios
And Mike Yeadon is there in comments pushing back on this idea just as I recall, and more than once!
Greg, I think that is the one. I am diligent about checking dates on papers but clearly missed that this is nearly a year old. One would hope he finds mRNA shots unacceptable for healthy humans at this point. Thank you for posting this!
Agree completely. Dr. McCullough has been heroic in his efforts to combat the globalists and educate the public about Covid and has done so at great personal cost. But like all of us, he's not perfect. If I recall correctly, he was still getting flu shots in 2021. He has more recently changed his view about flu shots and has become skeptical about vaccines more generally. Like you, I hope his view of the mRNA platform also has changed with time. His more recent favorable commentary about statins is particularly troubling. I hope at some point he'll review and address the almost universally negative reaction from his readers about his statin posts. He clearly knows the mRNA Covid shots are extraordinarily harmful and he knows Big Pharma has corrupted the medical journals, but it appears he doesn't fully appreciate the scope of the corruption or that it predates Covid by decades. I suspect that if he dives into statins like he has Covid, he'll no longer be touting them.
Agree about the statins. Convinced a family member to get off them who was just taking them as a precaution. Who does that? I’ll tell you who: doctors. They love drugs and have absolutely no sense. 😂
In recent days, he did publish a couple of things supportive of statins. Is it possible that's what you saw and not something about mRNA. (I was surprised and disappointed about the statin stuff -- I'm convinced by overwhelming medical research they try to censor that there are serious, debilitating toxic effects associated with statins and no real benefits.)
Statins are the biggest money maker. They even lowered blood pressure standards to sell more.
That’s an old article from when the pandemic first occurred.
You mean "when the Pandemic was first declared"? :)
lol! Exactly! Katherine Watt and Sasha L said they had similar experiences with Senator Johnson. They sent their findings in writing with no response. My personal opinion is that the fall out will be worse for those who pretend to be white hats in this.
I wrote a long letter to Ron Paul at least wo years ago, sent it to his house (have a mutual friend) begging him to get in touch with Jonathan Couey and got zero response. Unreal.
Yes. He will not dismiss it and could be good in the future (if dolts stop botching s*hit).
What?!? How the heck did he flip like that? That’s insane, it’s not like the safety profile improved in the last couple years nor was additional research done.
Agree. I'm doubtful Dr McCullough would have said anything positive about the mRNA platform.
He did.
Where on earth did I read that? Did it get pulled? It was late but I think even Yeadon pushed back on it. Maybe I was dreaming 🤦♀️
I believe you because i dont trust ANY OF THESE PEOPLE.
I trust Jessica, Mark K, JJ couey, Nick Hudson and a few more...TWC is corrupt as heck!
Zero-trust policy* is best, especially when it comes to people you don't know and connect with in real life. (By IRL, I mean face to face, not Zoom to Zoom):
*Never trust, always verify - however, I oppose this concept as applied to government using it to deny or place pre-requisites around civil liberties
You may appreciate this video on the TWC by Amazing Polly:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/0ZIM1sYaCGWm/
The connections and investors in this company are astounding, wild and beyond belief. VERY STRANGE BEDFELLOWS indeed. The founders' bios are particularly disturbing. There are some previous ones also regarding the founder of TWC attacking Polly for her investigations.
I do not necessarily agree with all she has to say but her ability to not only connect the dots (but find the dots and follow the money is quite illuminating.
I have begun to sour on all this freedom movement shit.
It has become a huge business. They cannibalize one another if they are not promoting one another. The biggest names we assumed were honest investigators may not be all they are cracked up to be.
As for the senators (esp. Rand Paul and Johnson) -- they have narrowly and studiously avoided any deep, serious analysis of emerging data on all fronts. I think the Fauci vs Paul circus was just a major decoy-distraction. I sure fell for it for a long time. I no longer believe Wuhan was the epicenter of the bioweapon.
Exactly. Almost count them on one hand and I followed Jessica way back when she was on Twitter (when you could and not actually have an account) as Woodhouse and Yeadon was Yardley and JJ was just on YT on his bike. Kept me sane and firmly in the control group.
"The point I'm making for the listeners is this isn't just all you know pie in the sky science these concepts are being applied to some therapies and the therapies I've mentioned so far are safe and effective so I don't want people listening to think that every single piece of RNA is bad that comes from a pharmaceutical company."
- P McCullough
The segment where McCullough speaks from 21:25 -23:25.
The full episode is only available to paid subscribers of Courageous Discourse™ with Dr. Peter McCullough & John Leake
https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/viroids-obelisks-and-viruses-explained
Here is the audio for free.
https://audio.pwfm.tech/interviews/240221-mckernan-mccollough-interview.mp3
I was appalled
They're all in on it. Money, money, money...they make me sick
Really? Mccullough went there???🙄
He heard her alright but decided to turn a deaf ear. The subject is too much outside of the covid lane he has been put in and he will not dare stray from it, he has been paid to chair committees and it is the same script time after time, nothing changes and nothing moves forward.
He could hear her as he then referenced her ‘Shannon’ by name.
Also if he happened to get her name from the screen, he would have been able to see the purple volume monitor under her name moving, to know that someone was speaking.
His responses were perfectly timed when Shannon had completed her comment, if he couldn’t hear her then how would he know when to interrupt especially after the first comment.
NY being a fraud doesn’t align with his chosen narrative.
Keep going Jessica, you are right over the target!
I know the moment is lost, but if the goal is to make sure Johnson receives the message, or has the chance to hear it, Shannon (or you) could try calling his office.
Yep.
But, as I'm sure you know, his staff heard it.
He has staff that listens to these Spaces live and afterward.
Sometimes I wonder if you are on the same journey I was 15 years ago...at the end, you realize that they are all in on it. They control the official narrative. They control the opposition narratives.
It's the only conclusion.
They aren't unprepared, they are well-prepared to pretend they don't hear anything they cannot control.
You're being SPARed. Sage Hana has been talking this and Johnson for like a year now. I first clued into Johnson in Nov ‘22 on Twitter livestream with Malone and Johnson on it and possibly George Webb. Johnson got his ass handed to him because he refused to discuss the Monster in the room.
That livestream predated widespread knowledge of the OTA contract for MCMs not pharmaceutical products. Johnson was dissembling about the DoD being involved purely for logistics capabilities.
That brief audio is the most blatant example yet of "investigative" stonewalling/gaslighting/silencing. My God, surely he can't suppose his "I can't hear" is anything but transparent proof of his devious role in this theatre.
What do children do when someone tells them something they don’t like? They cover their ears while shouting “I can’t hear you! I can’t hear you!”
letter writing campaign? I don't believe him.
See pinned comment on post
Were I obligated to bet my mortgage, given the subject matter and its being suppressed, and the knower of all truths would reveal the answer upon placing the wager...
I'd bet he could absolutely hear 7 days a week and twice on Sunday.
Sadly, we'll never know BUT he doesn't have that trick in his bag anymore.
His staff heard - live and/or thereafter.
Johnson served as Chairman of the Senate's Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee from 2015-2021 and is the ranking member for the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations.
You don't attain these positions by being a genuine "man of the people." You get these positions by being a reliable tool of the Empire and by being effective at MANAGING public opinion not by being concerned and responsive to it.
It was clear that there was some kind of technical problem.
Senator Johnson simply couldn’t hear what was being said, nothing strange or nefarious about it…..
At what point did he stop hearing her?
Or do you think he didn't hear her at all for ~35 seconds?
Also, do you have an explanation for why the Senator didn't say anything or try to say anything when another speaker summarized briefly? Would you expect a U.S. Senator to respond to each comment (or summary thereof) made in such a forum?
I’m sorry. I thought that you were actually asking for the opinion of your readers on what they heard.
I didn’t know that I was just supposed to confirm your pre-determined conclusion.
No need to worry though, there are other people here who will do it for you.
I stand by my opinion. He couldn’t hear you due to technical difficulties.
Sometimes an equipment problem is really just an equipment problem.
Where did I say you can’t express your opinion?
You did just that, and then I replied — and now you haven’t addressed the substance of my pushback.
See pinned comment for his staffer’s reply and subsequent exchange between the staffer and me.
He could hear everyone, everyone could hear her. Except he couldn't hear her. He sat there for 35" in complete silence.
He's a part of a group of government officials who are notoriously corrupt.
He goes silent when corruption he is supposed to be investigating is brought up.
None of that rules out a technical problem but all of it should make any critical thinker at least question if there was something more.
In today's world, even if you just started seeing it a few years ago, it's unbelievably foolish to dismiss nefarious motives from *anyone*, especially a government official, when it comes to the Psyop.
Anyone who does dismiss it is either part of the Psyop or just plain dumb.
Maybe the New York City 2020 death curve was a "technical difficulty" too?
Or "technical difficulty" explains the 11K-death processing event by the OCME? https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/why-did-the-new-york-city-medical
Another speaker that the Senator COULD hear briefly summarized. No reaction from the Senator. No interest in the topic and no "Shannon, I couldn't hear you, but please reach out to my staff and someone will respond."
Always concerned when a product is promoted. He mentions Dr. ROBERT YOUNG, who appears to be a straight shooter who paid his dues being arrested for healing cancer in a university in Cal.
Both are linked into the variation on Zeolite.
The time of the 5G rollout is curious.
How many rocks can we look under?
Better question; How many limited hangouts can the CIA and FBI get us to spend time on?
Signal reduction