Experience has taught the perpetrators that outrageous things can be the hardest to detect and the easiest to ignore, because the duped often don’t want to know, either.
Fellow campaigners often have their own niche(s). So few people are saying anything about any aspect of the worldwide crime that if one doesn’t focus all one’s attention to a narrow focus, it’s all dissipated.
For my part, very many people have heard me claim and explain my reasoning that the injections were never vaccines, not properly developed and were designed intentionally to injure, kill and reduce fertility in survivors.
I’m not sure a single informed person echoed these claims.
Unsurprisingly, the perpetrators are going to get away with it. So it seems to me.
If anything, interest has faded tremendously already. If I couldn’t generate interest in 2021-22, it’s hardly a surprise that nobody seems interested in 2025.
So you have my sympathy and respect. I don’t think it’s a conspiracy among those who are hollering, just that our individual voices are whipped away in the storm of utter nonsense surrounding everything these days.
Thanks, Mike. Replying here, in addition to Notes.
I agree re: the perpetrators and respect people's niches. I've made every effort to go beyond New York City and toward how and via what means the entire fraud was perpetrated in late 2019/early 2020. No one is forcing me to do this, I'm not working for anyone except myself and my family, and I don't expect anyone to feel sorry for me. That's not the heart of my post at all (and you weren't suggesting otherwise).
When I say "nobody wants to talk about this," I'm not alleging a conspiracy as much as I am resistance motivated by incentives/disincentives. If you follow the link in "dynamic silence" above, I think you will recognize what has and continues to occur.
Really, I am NOT directing my urgency toward non-Americans or people who have moved on or have other emphases. I'm speaking to and about U.S. citizens/residents who ARE still discussing, interested in, and/or writing about 2020+.
It's not about me and my work as much as it is the event itself. It's not as though John Ioannidis, Meryl Nass, Jeffrey Tucker, Sasha Latapova et al don't know about and have never mentioned the event.
If we're talking UK, and not about NYC per se, I have no explanation as to why (for instance) Tom Jefferson is protecting whistleblowers https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/the-lombardy-saga-whistleblowers or why Clare Craig (whom I've met in real life) won't acknowledge receipt of my response to her - even when I emailed her and asked her to acknowledge that she's seen it (and that I didn't need or expect a reply to the "letter" itself. https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/response-to-clare-craig-88e
(I'm also confused about why a UK citizen, Aseem Maholtra, has been named CMO of an American lobby group...am I missing something there? That's weird, no?)
Anyway, I appreciate your support. My skills are few but I work hard and am tough to outlast. Same is true of you, it seems. So here we are. :)
EDIT: Obviously, I'm grateful for Jeremiah Hosea and Jeremy Nell and people I've written with who are helping draw attention to NYC and Bergamo and the staged pandemic. My "complaint" is really regarding how U.S. officials can be getting away with not having to explain or substantiate this event. I'm sorry, but people like Jay Bhattacharya should be ashamed of themselves at this point. There is simply no excuse for the pretense.
I must say, someone mentioned Dr Malhotra’s appointment to me very recently and it confused the dickens out of me, too! There are surely many US citizens who are every bit as suitable for the role.
I know how hard you’ve battled a vital niche. Exposing the truth about NYC has the potential to blow up everything.
I do think in most cases the hindrance is that there are few who are entirely free to follow the evidence, no matter where it takes us. I don’t know to what extent those who won’t say certain things are conscious of inhibitions. I used to assume it had to be a conscious choice but as time has worn on, I’m sure of less and less.
“Exposing the truth about NYC has the potential to blow up everything.” The fact that most of the so-called dissidents willfully ignore these events speaks volumes. Clearly they don’t want to blow it up. Even they need much of the narrative in place to justify their new-found fame. As always, misaligned incentives rule.
Thanks for your dogged and systematic work, Jessica, which it seems people don’t want to engage with. That must be very frustrating. It seems to me that a basic problem is that nobody wants to come to grips with the possibility that they were duped. It’s less traumatising to ignore the evidence and continue with more or less the same narrative about a dangerous, spreading virus, than it is to contemplate that they have been conned. (Reminiscent, in fact, of the mounting evidence that the events of 911 were also not as the official narratives proclaim.)
Yes, It is very frustrating that fellow Americans in the COVID space ignore the New York event. Matt Shapiro (Polimath on Substack and X), who knows who I am and that I've focused on the event for a while, wrote about it recently. I disagree with his explicit and implied views but I also find it extremely disingenuous to pretend that no one else has been looking into this.
Really hoping we don't have to wait 15 more years for the people to wake up on this!
Experience has taught the perpetrators that outrageous things can be the hardest to detect and the easiest to ignore, because the duped often don’t want to know, either.
Fellow campaigners often have their own niche(s). So few people are saying anything about any aspect of the worldwide crime that if one doesn’t focus all one’s attention to a narrow focus, it’s all dissipated.
For my part, very many people have heard me claim and explain my reasoning that the injections were never vaccines, not properly developed and were designed intentionally to injure, kill and reduce fertility in survivors.
I’m not sure a single informed person echoed these claims.
Unsurprisingly, the perpetrators are going to get away with it. So it seems to me.
If anything, interest has faded tremendously already. If I couldn’t generate interest in 2021-22, it’s hardly a surprise that nobody seems interested in 2025.
So you have my sympathy and respect. I don’t think it’s a conspiracy among those who are hollering, just that our individual voices are whipped away in the storm of utter nonsense surrounding everything these days.
Thanks, Mike. Replying here, in addition to Notes.
I agree re: the perpetrators and respect people's niches. I've made every effort to go beyond New York City and toward how and via what means the entire fraud was perpetrated in late 2019/early 2020. No one is forcing me to do this, I'm not working for anyone except myself and my family, and I don't expect anyone to feel sorry for me. That's not the heart of my post at all (and you weren't suggesting otherwise).
When I say "nobody wants to talk about this," I'm not alleging a conspiracy as much as I am resistance motivated by incentives/disincentives. If you follow the link in "dynamic silence" above, I think you will recognize what has and continues to occur.
Really, I am NOT directing my urgency toward non-Americans or people who have moved on or have other emphases. I'm speaking to and about U.S. citizens/residents who ARE still discussing, interested in, and/or writing about 2020+.
It's not about me and my work as much as it is the event itself. It's not as though John Ioannidis, Meryl Nass, Jeffrey Tucker, Sasha Latapova et al don't know about and have never mentioned the event.
https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/john-ioannidis-is-wrong-about-the https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/responding-to-meryl-nasss-claims https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/the-possibility-of-a-poisoning-event
https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/question-everything-except-that-thing
If we're talking UK, and not about NYC per se, I have no explanation as to why (for instance) Tom Jefferson is protecting whistleblowers https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/the-lombardy-saga-whistleblowers or why Clare Craig (whom I've met in real life) won't acknowledge receipt of my response to her - even when I emailed her and asked her to acknowledge that she's seen it (and that I didn't need or expect a reply to the "letter" itself. https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/response-to-clare-craig-88e
(I'm also confused about why a UK citizen, Aseem Maholtra, has been named CMO of an American lobby group...am I missing something there? That's weird, no?)
Anyway, I appreciate your support. My skills are few but I work hard and am tough to outlast. Same is true of you, it seems. So here we are. :)
EDIT: Obviously, I'm grateful for Jeremiah Hosea and Jeremy Nell and people I've written with who are helping draw attention to NYC and Bergamo and the staged pandemic. My "complaint" is really regarding how U.S. officials can be getting away with not having to explain or substantiate this event. I'm sorry, but people like Jay Bhattacharya should be ashamed of themselves at this point. There is simply no excuse for the pretense.
I must say, someone mentioned Dr Malhotra’s appointment to me very recently and it confused the dickens out of me, too! There are surely many US citizens who are every bit as suitable for the role.
I know how hard you’ve battled a vital niche. Exposing the truth about NYC has the potential to blow up everything.
I do think in most cases the hindrance is that there are few who are entirely free to follow the evidence, no matter where it takes us. I don’t know to what extent those who won’t say certain things are conscious of inhibitions. I used to assume it had to be a conscious choice but as time has worn on, I’m sure of less and less.
The reasons and factors for most are varied and complex, I am sure.
No one on US soil is qualified for MAHA CMO apparently! 😂🤷♀️
“Exposing the truth about NYC has the potential to blow up everything.” The fact that most of the so-called dissidents willfully ignore these events speaks volumes. Clearly they don’t want to blow it up. Even they need much of the narrative in place to justify their new-found fame. As always, misaligned incentives rule.
Indeed they do not want to blow it all up
I'm in the process of writing a comprehensive report/paper about the event/my findings, which will include comparisons to the Lombardy/Bergamo event
I received some rather indicting records from an agency a few weeks ago that I may report on Substack soon (or I may leave it for the paper).
Maybe when everything is in one place, people can consider more seriously and thoughtfully the full case for fraud
Thanks for your dogged and systematic work, Jessica, which it seems people don’t want to engage with. That must be very frustrating. It seems to me that a basic problem is that nobody wants to come to grips with the possibility that they were duped. It’s less traumatising to ignore the evidence and continue with more or less the same narrative about a dangerous, spreading virus, than it is to contemplate that they have been conned. (Reminiscent, in fact, of the mounting evidence that the events of 911 were also not as the official narratives proclaim.)
Thanks, Barry.
Yes, It is very frustrating that fellow Americans in the COVID space ignore the New York event. Matt Shapiro (Polimath on Substack and X), who knows who I am and that I've focused on the event for a while, wrote about it recently. I disagree with his explicit and implied views but I also find it extremely disingenuous to pretend that no one else has been looking into this.
Really hoping we don't have to wait 15 more years for the people to wake up on this!