I believed you have commented that you don’t believe the Covid vax is as dangerous as others that you work with believe. Have you read Denis Rancourt’s recent Substack re the mechanism for his claim of 17 million dead from the Covid vax campaign? I commented on his article with the following:
“If I understand you correctly, the number of adverse events due to COVID shots themselves is in itself not enough to account for the 17 million deaths you believe are attributed to the COVID vaccination campaign. I believe you previously said that the bulk of vax associated deaths are in the elderly. So perhaps the elderly are more vulnerable to the measures used in, and surrounding, the administration of the shots than younger people. So that is why that age group has a higher number of deaths post covid vaccine. Whereas younger people may be less susceptible to these measures and thus die in lesser numbers post vaccine. Of course, the younger cohort can still be injured and die from the inherent dangers of the COVID shots such as from immune attack of transfected cells, DNA integration and production of aberrant proteins due to ribosomal frame shifting to name a few.”
1) I am unpersuaded the COVID shot is a driver of excess death and the suspect all-cause death curves of many counties (not just the U.S.) are manipulated.
2) I believe the COVID shot - though morally/ethically wrong and injurious and very likely risk-additive for many groups - was an intentional "decoy"
3) I humbly assert The Powers that Be are fine with COVID shot discussion because it
a) distracts from the mass euthanasia event of 2020, b) was purposely set-up to "fail," and c) accomplished what it was supposed to accomplish (i.e., hide years of flu and other shot problems & on-ramp mRNA)
Thank you for all your hard work.
You're welcome. Thanks for supporting the hard work!
I believed you have commented that you don’t believe the Covid vax is as dangerous as others that you work with believe. Have you read Denis Rancourt’s recent Substack re the mechanism for his claim of 17 million dead from the Covid vax campaign? I commented on his article with the following:
“If I understand you correctly, the number of adverse events due to COVID shots themselves is in itself not enough to account for the 17 million deaths you believe are attributed to the COVID vaccination campaign. I believe you previously said that the bulk of vax associated deaths are in the elderly. So perhaps the elderly are more vulnerable to the measures used in, and surrounding, the administration of the shots than younger people. So that is why that age group has a higher number of deaths post covid vaccine. Whereas younger people may be less susceptible to these measures and thus die in lesser numbers post vaccine. Of course, the younger cohort can still be injured and die from the inherent dangers of the COVID shots such as from immune attack of transfected cells, DNA integration and production of aberrant proteins due to ribosomal frame shifting to name a few.”
He replied “Yes.”
What do you think of his hypothesis?
I've said the following:
1) I am unpersuaded the COVID shot is a driver of excess death and the suspect all-cause death curves of many counties (not just the U.S.) are manipulated.
2) I believe the COVID shot - though morally/ethically wrong and injurious and very likely risk-additive for many groups - was an intentional "decoy"
3) I humbly assert The Powers that Be are fine with COVID shot discussion because it
a) distracts from the mass euthanasia event of 2020, b) was purposely set-up to "fail," and c) accomplished what it was supposed to accomplish (i.e., hide years of flu and other shot problems & on-ramp mRNA)
https://x.com/Wood_House76/status/1797975840946258069
I don't have any comment on Rancourt's current hypothesis at this time.