Agreed. However, given the severe structural impediments which still make it as painful as possible to avoid childhood vaccination - school requirements, for example, not to mention the past heinous, authoritarian COVID vaccine requirements for school, work, restaurants, sporting events, etc. - it would be extremely helpful to get some legal/regulatory relief.
At this point does there remain any good reason - a reason which benefits anyone other than those who profit from the manufacture and sale of pharmaceutical products of dubious health benefit - to continue the unquestioned use of all vaccines? It certainly seems that there is sufficiently compelling evidence calling into question the entire scientific basis for the usefulness and efficacy of vaccinations, as well as their potential harms, that further approvals should be halted and every existing vaccine should be carefully re-examined and scrutinized. If not, what possible further data would be required? Isn’t the premise of pharma approval supposed to be first reliably determine that no harm is done or at the very least that the benefits strongly outweigh the potential harm, rather than allowing or even requiring use until and unless tremendous harm has already been done and has been widely shown in spite of massive efforts by those who profit form their sale? Seems abundantly clear we have gotten that exactly backwatds for quite some time now. Long past time to get back to the sane and proper methodology.
That should apply to every human vaccine as well as animal vaccines - chickens, cattle, dogs, pigs, everything. It is not inconceivable that the entire vaccine industry may be exposed as nothing more than a giant, harmful, dangerous money-making scheme. Perhaps not, but the possibility seems increasingly likely. Stop the potential poisoning of people and food until an honest, proper, unbiased scientific investigation shows whether each and every vaccine can be proven safe and beneficial to people other than vaccine manufacturers.
Anyone who could stomach listening to those Senators during the RFK committee hearings has to realize how entrenched the propaganda is, not just among these bloviating idiots (including—and as a physician myself the most annoying—Dr Bill Cassidy ) but among a high percentage of the general public. They’ve been convinced they have no innate immunity—in fact no immune system at all—and without the vaccines they are completely defenseless against these infectious diseases, never mind almost all of them are quite benign, including measles. I wonder how I survived measles and chicken pox as a kid when there were no vaccines.
Polio? Don’t get me started. I never thought as a pathologist with a graduate degree in immunology I’d say this but I’m now pretty convinced polio is not an infectious disease at all but the result of neurotoxic pesticides. Guess Mitch McConnell didn’t agree.
References and allusions:
"Just Say No" campaign https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Just_Say_No
"Do the Right Thing" (film) https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0097216/
"Sure Shot" (Beastie Boys) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JhqyZeUlE8U
"back in the day" (idiom) https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/back-in-the-day
"We the People" https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/preamble
"Starve the beast" (political strategy) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starve_the_beast
GenX https://www.britannica.com/topic/Generation-X
Agreed. However, given the severe structural impediments which still make it as painful as possible to avoid childhood vaccination - school requirements, for example, not to mention the past heinous, authoritarian COVID vaccine requirements for school, work, restaurants, sporting events, etc. - it would be extremely helpful to get some legal/regulatory relief.
At this point does there remain any good reason - a reason which benefits anyone other than those who profit from the manufacture and sale of pharmaceutical products of dubious health benefit - to continue the unquestioned use of all vaccines? It certainly seems that there is sufficiently compelling evidence calling into question the entire scientific basis for the usefulness and efficacy of vaccinations, as well as their potential harms, that further approvals should be halted and every existing vaccine should be carefully re-examined and scrutinized. If not, what possible further data would be required? Isn’t the premise of pharma approval supposed to be first reliably determine that no harm is done or at the very least that the benefits strongly outweigh the potential harm, rather than allowing or even requiring use until and unless tremendous harm has already been done and has been widely shown in spite of massive efforts by those who profit form their sale? Seems abundantly clear we have gotten that exactly backwatds for quite some time now. Long past time to get back to the sane and proper methodology.
That should apply to every human vaccine as well as animal vaccines - chickens, cattle, dogs, pigs, everything. It is not inconceivable that the entire vaccine industry may be exposed as nothing more than a giant, harmful, dangerous money-making scheme. Perhaps not, but the possibility seems increasingly likely. Stop the potential poisoning of people and food until an honest, proper, unbiased scientific investigation shows whether each and every vaccine can be proven safe and beneficial to people other than vaccine manufacturers.
Keep after it!
Anyone who could stomach listening to those Senators during the RFK committee hearings has to realize how entrenched the propaganda is, not just among these bloviating idiots (including—and as a physician myself the most annoying—Dr Bill Cassidy ) but among a high percentage of the general public. They’ve been convinced they have no innate immunity—in fact no immune system at all—and without the vaccines they are completely defenseless against these infectious diseases, never mind almost all of them are quite benign, including measles. I wonder how I survived measles and chicken pox as a kid when there were no vaccines.
Polio? Don’t get me started. I never thought as a pathologist with a graduate degree in immunology I’d say this but I’m now pretty convinced polio is not an infectious disease at all but the result of neurotoxic pesticides. Guess Mitch McConnell didn’t agree.
100 Senators vs ~330M non-Senators
I like our odds