There Was No Pandemic, Jay.
The incoming NIH Director should publicly acknowledge that pandemics are up for debate.
I am still at-odds with — and still blocked by — soon-to-be NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya.1
My larger account (@Wood_House76) has been blocked for some time, while the smaller, current account was blocked last September. You can read more about the circumstances here:
I first connected with Jay on a group Zoom call in autumn 2020, around the time the Great Barrington Declaration was published.2 He later played a role in helping restore my and other COVID 'dissident' accounts that had been suspended.
Delving deeper into the New York City mass casualty event during my five-month suspension shifted some of my views from 'permitted dissent' to perspectives deemed ‘out-of-bounds’.3 A January 2023 exchange between Jay and me highlights our growing differences in perspective.
In April 2023, I respectfully questioned Jay about a statement he and his colleagues made in a September 2020 modeling study on asymptomatic transmission, which endorsed mask mandates. I had opposed mask mandates from the moment they were announced in my suburb. Jay had a general awareness of my well-documented virtual and real-life battles against those mandates.
You can read the full exchange here.
None of this changes the fact that Jay Bhattacharya is a kind-hearted man and a significant improvement over his predecessors. While I opposed his nomination as NIH Director, I have not actively crusaded against it.
What I have crusaded against - and will continue to do so without apology, whether alone or with likeminded colleagues - is the ‘Next Pandemic’ view held by Jay, The Norfolk Group, and panelists at a Stanford conference he hosted last fall, including Sunetra Gupta, John Ioannidis, Scott Atlas.
It’s hard to deny that focusing solely or primarily on the COVID shot won’t slay the well-funded pandemic preparedness beast that needs to be slain. Triggering the appearance of a sudden-spreading pathogen requires only a story and a test - or, apparently, a social media rumor to serve as an excuse for a test.
The strongest, simplest message that can be delivered to Jay Bhattarcharya by those who are not blocked or have his attention - and who are equally-convinced in their own hearts and minds - is
THERE WAS NO PANDEMIC.4
Everything was criminal. Every. Single. Thing.
You don’t have to be a scientist to say it.
You don’t have to be an American to say it.
You don’t have to be an adult to say it.
You don’t have to speak English to express it.5
If, at this point, you believe there was a pandemic, I hope to change your mind. Or perhaps you’ll change mine.
But at the very least, let’s all acknowledge that neither the events of 2020, nor pandemics as phenomena more generally, are anywhere near being “settled science.”
I support an individual’s decision to block anyone for any reason and am not “complaining” as much as I am making a statement of fact.
I signed the GBD, have said I would not sign it again, and applauded
’s request to have his name withdrawn.For context regarding my use of these terms, see False Binaries that 'Limit the Spectrum of Acceptable Opinion' in the COVID-19 Debate and Perpetuate Lies Told by The Powers That Be (Part 1)
For inspiration, see Every single aspect of the “Covid” narrative is fake. There was no pandemic. | Why do people still believe in Covid? | What the declared pandemic was and was not |
’s recent interview with Craig Houston at the Scottish People’s InquiryNo hubo pandemia | Non c’è stata alcuna pandemia | לא הייתה מגיפה | Δεν υπήρξε πανδημία | Non fuit pandemicus | etc. (translations via Google)
The kooks & crims are never gonna admit it was - among many other things - a big DNA sequence harvest from the unsuspecting common folk using the covid swab trickery.
Posted your No pandemic paragraph to Jay. Let’s see if he blocks me