The kooks & crims are never gonna admit it was - among many other things - a big DNA sequence harvest from the unsuspecting common folk using the covid swab trickery.
I have not characterized Jay Bhattacharya as a kook or a criminal.
I'm also not saying he has to "admit" anything that does not align with his own convictions. Rather I am submitting that if he cares about science, free speech, open debate, etc, he should at least publicly acknowledge that the question of whether there was a pandemic in 2020 (or ever) is not settled science and is open for debate.
As for the best example I know about regarding DNA collection, it did not involve a swab. The University of Illinois started a saliva testing company in early 2020 and then used it to violate state law regarding such testing, did not provide adequate informed consent about how the specimen would be used, and warehoused the data attached to specimen, with an eye toward selling it. https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/transcript-u-of-i-president-tim-killeens
Unfortunately but unsurprisingly, the legislator doing the questioning in that session above narrowly lost her re-election bid.
Like I said - any LARPer who goes off-script gets whacked, in one way or another.
In the case of CovidHoax, the cytology ("covid') swabs up the wahzoo offer even more valuable specimens for sequencing compared to saliva. Supposedly the commandeered/stolen sequences naturally become public domain, although prolly the government doesn't feel to be under any obligation to publish them in an open database or at least not in the foreseeable future.
"People also ask:
Who owns your DNA and its information?
The interpretation of the courts is that once the DNA/tissue leaves the body, it is no longer the property of the individual. The courts seem to be relying on the informed consent contracts that patients sign prior to any procedure, which establishes clear guidelines for the future ownership of said materials."
My assumption is that one or another among the many acute phase RNA sequences - and thus the corresponding amino acid sequences - were carefully chosen for the trickery. Physiological or mental stress is enuf for the stuff to get expressed & thus detected.
stuff like this -
"Acute phase protein concentration in pharyngeal swabs from clinically healthy commercial dairy calves"
If you're asking if I know what happened, of course I don't know but just reverse engineering as a thought problem.
Just as a didactic hypothetical example: the idea is that the plandemic spooks would do experiments like in the example below but doing it in their top secret labs and looking for sequences associated with psychological stress that overlap with sequences associated with the common cold, and then if they find such sequences then they make up some more stuff and publish the sequences as belonging to the 'coronavirus'.
Also, the same result could be achieved not by deception but by virtue of innocent mistakes, in which biomarkers for stress responses are misconstrued as 'coronavirus'.
In either case, anybody feeling sick & nervous would be more likely to test positive for 'coronavirus' than somebody who is feeling calm & healthy despite the big psychological warfare all around.
"Genome-wide mRNA Expression Analysis of Acute Psychological Stress Responses Transcriptome profiling of acute psychological stress"
Jeongok G Logan, Sijung Yun, Bethany A Teachman, Yongde Bao, Emily Farber, Charles R Farber
The kooks & crims are never gonna admit it was - among many other things - a big DNA sequence harvest from the unsuspecting common folk using the covid swab trickery.
I have not characterized Jay Bhattacharya as a kook or a criminal.
I'm also not saying he has to "admit" anything that does not align with his own convictions. Rather I am submitting that if he cares about science, free speech, open debate, etc, he should at least publicly acknowledge that the question of whether there was a pandemic in 2020 (or ever) is not settled science and is open for debate.
As for the best example I know about regarding DNA collection, it did not involve a swab. The University of Illinois started a saliva testing company in early 2020 and then used it to violate state law regarding such testing, did not provide adequate informed consent about how the specimen would be used, and warehoused the data attached to specimen, with an eye toward selling it. https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/transcript-u-of-i-president-tim-killeens
Unfortunately but unsurprisingly, the legislator doing the questioning in that session above narrowly lost her re-election bid.
Like I said - any LARPer who goes off-script gets whacked, in one way or another.
In the case of CovidHoax, the cytology ("covid') swabs up the wahzoo offer even more valuable specimens for sequencing compared to saliva. Supposedly the commandeered/stolen sequences naturally become public domain, although prolly the government doesn't feel to be under any obligation to publish them in an open database or at least not in the foreseeable future.
"People also ask:
Who owns your DNA and its information?
The interpretation of the courts is that once the DNA/tissue leaves the body, it is no longer the property of the individual. The courts seem to be relying on the informed consent contracts that patients sign prior to any procedure, which establishes clear guidelines for the future ownership of said materials."
The antigen for SARS-CoV-2 wasn't derived from anyone who was actually sick with a novel illness, correct?
My assumption is that one or another among the many acute phase RNA sequences - and thus the corresponding amino acid sequences - were carefully chosen for the trickery. Physiological or mental stress is enuf for the stuff to get expressed & thus detected.
stuff like this -
"Acute phase protein concentration in pharyngeal swabs from clinically healthy commercial dairy calves"
Mette Bisgaard Petersen, Nynne Capion
Acta Vet Scand. 2023 Nov 25;65:49
Acute phase of...? Chosen from...?
If you're asking if I know what happened, of course I don't know but just reverse engineering as a thought problem.
Just as a didactic hypothetical example: the idea is that the plandemic spooks would do experiments like in the example below but doing it in their top secret labs and looking for sequences associated with psychological stress that overlap with sequences associated with the common cold, and then if they find such sequences then they make up some more stuff and publish the sequences as belonging to the 'coronavirus'.
Also, the same result could be achieved not by deception but by virtue of innocent mistakes, in which biomarkers for stress responses are misconstrued as 'coronavirus'.
In either case, anybody feeling sick & nervous would be more likely to test positive for 'coronavirus' than somebody who is feeling calm & healthy despite the big psychological warfare all around.
"Genome-wide mRNA Expression Analysis of Acute Psychological Stress Responses Transcriptome profiling of acute psychological stress"
Jeongok G Logan, Sijung Yun, Bethany A Teachman, Yongde Bao, Emily Farber, Charles R Farber
MEDICC Rev. 2022 May 16;24(2):35–42
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9549129/
Posted your No pandemic paragraph to Jay. Let’s see if he blocks me
Thanks. I'm sure he won't block you.