Great presentation. Keep the heat on NYC. You know they're just hiding behind excuses to conceal the record level data on death certificates for the time frames of interest. Having lived and practiced medicine in NYC all my adult life I remain convinced that the institutional debacle of March 2020 was the result of a government "coordinated response" to an exaggerated threat. The purpose was and remains the surveillance, control, and subjugation of people under bio-pharmaceutical tyranny.
Hello. Are you aware of the same massive death spike in Manaus, Brazil, similar to the one in NYC? Makes absolutely no sense, and was also subject of massive media hysteria.
Brazilian all-cause mortality records can be found here, from 1979 to April 2023 (labeled 'previa', or preview). Linked text files open easily in ACCESS. DTOBITO is date of obit, and to filter out Manaus, CODMUNOCOR would be 130260 (municipality code). Deaths of people who live in Manaus would be CONDMUNRES. CAUSABAS is first cause of death, using the CID-10 code. Any other questions let me know.
Thanks. I'm not sure I'll be able to go through it properly (the language and formatting differences in other countries can be a challenge), but I've posted the links for colleagues in PANDA to take a look at as well.
I have a deep feeling that in years to come you'll be proven to be one of the very few over the target. IMHO the only part that's yet to be seriously discussed is the why and IMHO it all started in January 2018 with Trump's war on China.
Swinging by again (I really don't like using Twitter given how censorious it is). So, I had a thought; it is unlikely we're going to get them to admit the autopsy/coroner death reports are falsified.
However, what if there was some way to do it in reverse? One of my subscribers posted this article showing evidence of a murder ('forced euthanasia') in exactly the format we suspect... during the so-called COVID period:
It's a rock solid legal case with extensive details. Yes, I recognise it isn't New York, but surely out of the 20k dead in New York, there must have been at least one disgruntled family who filed suit? At least one case where someone had received a cocktail of drugs, formally on record, who was then mysteriously declared as having 'COVID-19'?
If we could punch holes in the reliability of the coroner/autopsy/death reports, by showing clear cut examples of a person dying one way (E.G. poisoning) and then being labelled another (E.G. COVID-19), we could cast doubt on the whole set of paperwork and prompt reasonable suspicion to warrant an investigation into fraud.
You'd have to compile a list of names, ages, date of births etc to 'comb through' for in obituaries, court cases and the like. It is more manual, but it would also bypass this evident stonewalling by the Department of Health. I am thoroughly convinced they did something akin to mass murder because it is extremely unusual for me to hit a complete wall of silence like this.
Remember, my focus isn't on cause of death attribution per se; it's on the all-cause curve. Autopsy reports are insubordinate to proof of death, regardless of cause attributed.
Note to all, the transcripts are AI generated, so they'll have errors (probably a lot of them), but what they're REALLY useful for is searching the part you want to find (e.g. using ctrl/cmd-f or "find on page").
Now use it to search for your favourite parts. Send links directly to that time. Clip the part you want. Caption them if you want as well (there are ways -- ask here if you need help). Then share share share!
Swinging by to give you a status update on the NY health query: they completely stonewalled my query.
This would mean Health NYC gov are also complicit in the cover-ups. In-fact, this would suggest the NYC government itself directed it. I will see if I can find an alternate way in.
I've filed a follow up FOI with the health department asking the same question. Mysteriously they don't record electronic FOI requests with the health department, can't wait to see how this goes...
If someone is willing to publicly take intellectual risks in a climate of fear & omertà. at personal and/or professional cost - and isn’t generating hundreds of thousands of dollars from it - it’s worth noting.
Absolutely. Brave and correct are two different things. But if I have to choose between censorship and boldly seeking answers; and such seeking is labeled ‘dangerous’, then I’ll take the danger, please. And unapologetically! Respect ✊🏾
I heard you talk about the flu shot. That probably pissed them off. It's pretty impossible to work around their community guidelines which are just about censoring people. It's nothing to do with community.
Google's probably pulling the real-time transcription of videos to its servers and checking to see if what's said violates terms of service. Then, unless there's been a violent threat, it waits until the livestream ends to take down the video.
I remember years back being leery of the acronym FAANGIT (facebook, apple, amazon, netflix, google, instagram, twitter) when it seemed like Silicon Valley billionaires and/or China had appeared to have too much influence over how they were to be used.
p.s., Can I repurpose a graph which I believe you made? It is the one at Minute Mark 50:00, with the COVID deaths, overlayed on top of the emergency room visits, and also on top of the ambulance calls in NYC?
We are actually in the process of updating that graph in the "Does New York 2020 Make Sense?" article because we resolved an issue involving anomalous spikes in the transporting patients data, so I'd prefer you wait until that update is made, which should be by tomorrow. FYI, the resolution did not change the trend or the significant drop in the number of patients transported via ambulance in March and April.
Also, note that the graph (Figure 8) is NOT ambulance calls. It is ambulance dispatches of one kind - dispatches that transported a patient from one point of pick up to another point.
Links to full convo are embedded in the post, but ICYMI, you can access all versions here: https://sites.google.com/housatonicits.com/live/home
Great presentation. Keep the heat on NYC. You know they're just hiding behind excuses to conceal the record level data on death certificates for the time frames of interest. Having lived and practiced medicine in NYC all my adult life I remain convinced that the institutional debacle of March 2020 was the result of a government "coordinated response" to an exaggerated threat. The purpose was and remains the surveillance, control, and subjugation of people under bio-pharmaceutical tyranny.
Well-put and thank you
can’t have questions now can we. Shut up and never question the dear leader. Are we in pre WW2 Japan? Google is a god? That can’t allow dissent?
Hello. Are you aware of the same massive death spike in Manaus, Brazil, similar to the one in NYC? Makes absolutely no sense, and was also subject of massive media hysteria.
If the figure showing daily deaths is presentative of the peak, then it doesn't come anywhere close to NYC https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7906746/
If you compare Manaus with the rest of Brazil, the spike is obvious, though not as acute as the NYC case
And it came after the 2020
flu shot and Covid shot rollouts
Actually, no. It happens in 2020. If you want, I´ll send you the data.
guntherheinz@outlook.com.br
Brazilian all-cause mortality records can be found here, from 1979 to April 2023 (labeled 'previa', or preview). Linked text files open easily in ACCESS. DTOBITO is date of obit, and to filter out Manaus, CODMUNOCOR would be 130260 (municipality code). Deaths of people who live in Manaus would be CONDMUNRES. CAUSABAS is first cause of death, using the CID-10 code. Any other questions let me know.
https://opendatasus.saude.gov.br/dataset/sim
Provide a link to the data and I’ll take a look
other databases available by are covid vax records, hospitalization for SARDS and flu reporting, all record level:
https://opendatasus.saude.gov.br/dataset
Thanks. I'm not sure I'll be able to go through it properly (the language and formatting differences in other countries can be a challenge), but I've posted the links for colleagues in PANDA to take a look at as well.
I have a deep feeling that in years to come you'll be proven to be one of the very few over the target. IMHO the only part that's yet to be seriously discussed is the why and IMHO it all started in January 2018 with Trump's war on China.
I may not be right, but I’m at least not wrong about this much: whatever happened isn’t what we’ve been told.
COVID is a geopolitical operation.
If not seen in this context assessments will be wrong from the outset.
Most people do not appreciate the level of "involvement" Western intelligence agencies have throughout China.
Bingo - anyone pushing the "CCP bad" meme is full of beans.
great interview!
Swinging by again (I really don't like using Twitter given how censorious it is). So, I had a thought; it is unlikely we're going to get them to admit the autopsy/coroner death reports are falsified.
However, what if there was some way to do it in reverse? One of my subscribers posted this article showing evidence of a murder ('forced euthanasia') in exactly the format we suspect... during the so-called COVID period:
https://fullbroadside.substack.com/p/the-schara-case
It's a rock solid legal case with extensive details. Yes, I recognise it isn't New York, but surely out of the 20k dead in New York, there must have been at least one disgruntled family who filed suit? At least one case where someone had received a cocktail of drugs, formally on record, who was then mysteriously declared as having 'COVID-19'?
If we could punch holes in the reliability of the coroner/autopsy/death reports, by showing clear cut examples of a person dying one way (E.G. poisoning) and then being labelled another (E.G. COVID-19), we could cast doubt on the whole set of paperwork and prompt reasonable suspicion to warrant an investigation into fraud.
You'd have to compile a list of names, ages, date of births etc to 'comb through' for in obituaries, court cases and the like. It is more manual, but it would also bypass this evident stonewalling by the Department of Health. I am thoroughly convinced they did something akin to mass murder because it is extremely unusual for me to hit a complete wall of silence like this.
Yes, I know the Grace Schara case well.
Remember, my focus isn't on cause of death attribution per se; it's on the all-cause curve. Autopsy reports are insubordinate to proof of death, regardless of cause attributed.
But on the matter of autopsies....
https://x.com/Wood_House76/status/1731130459877187994?s=20
Yes but you did talk about the data anomalies as underlying factors to support the VAXX aka countermeasures.
Also kudos on your efforts from a fellow Chicagoan...albeit South Sider...
Thank you! Not sure why it takes someone from Chicagoland to draw attention to an even in New York... :)
Note to all, the transcripts are AI generated, so they'll have errors (probably a lot of them), but what they're REALLY useful for is searching the part you want to find (e.g. using ctrl/cmd-f or "find on page").
https://github.com/Housatonic-Live/Episode.Transcripts/blob/main/episodes/(2023-12-01)%20Ep%20246.1%20-%20Interview%20w%20Jessica%20Hockett%20(Wood%20House%2076)%20on%202020%20New%20York%20City%20health%20data%20(and%20more)/(2023-12-01)%20Ep%20246.1%20-%20Interview%20w%20Jessica%20Hockett%20(Wood%20House%2076)%20on%202020%20New%20York%20City%20health%20data%20(and%20more).vtt
Now use it to search for your favourite parts. Send links directly to that time. Clip the part you want. Caption them if you want as well (there are ways -- ask here if you need help). Then share share share!
Swinging by to give you a status update on the NY health query: they completely stonewalled my query.
This would mean Health NYC gov are also complicit in the cover-ups. In-fact, this would suggest the NYC government itself directed it. I will see if I can find an alternate way in.
Par for the course
I've filed a follow up FOI with the health department asking the same question. Mysteriously they don't record electronic FOI requests with the health department, can't wait to see how this goes...
We should all get comfortable with dangerous… tends to bring with it a measure of respect.
If someone is willing to publicly take intellectual risks in a climate of fear & omertà. at personal and/or professional cost - and isn’t generating hundreds of thousands of dollars from it - it’s worth noting.
Doesn’t make the person correct though.
Absolutely. Brave and correct are two different things. But if I have to choose between censorship and boldly seeking answers; and such seeking is labeled ‘dangerous’, then I’ll take the danger, please. And unapologetically! Respect ✊🏾
I heard you talk about the flu shot. That probably pissed them off. It's pretty impossible to work around their community guidelines which are just about censoring people. It's nothing to do with community.
It's a Community of Censorship, where The Company has decided how to keep people in The Community "safe"
Read "The Giver" by Lois Lowry.
Google's probably pulling the real-time transcription of videos to its servers and checking to see if what's said violates terms of service. Then, unless there's been a violent threat, it waits until the livestream ends to take down the video.
Jessica, these COVID Censors are terrible.
I remember years back being leery of the acronym FAANGIT (facebook, apple, amazon, netflix, google, instagram, twitter) when it seemed like Silicon Valley billionaires and/or China had appeared to have too much influence over how they were to be used.
p.s., Can I repurpose a graph which I believe you made? It is the one at Minute Mark 50:00, with the COVID deaths, overlayed on top of the emergency room visits, and also on top of the ambulance calls in NYC?
Hi. Thanks for your interest.
We are actually in the process of updating that graph in the "Does New York 2020 Make Sense?" article because we resolved an issue involving anomalous spikes in the transporting patients data, so I'd prefer you wait until that update is made, which should be by tomorrow. FYI, the resolution did not change the trend or the significant drop in the number of patients transported via ambulance in March and April.
Also, note that the graph (Figure 8) is NOT ambulance calls. It is ambulance dispatches of one kind - dispatches that transported a patient from one point of pick up to another point.
Thanks for the new information about that, Jessica. I'll wait for the update.
Please tell me you have a back up copy on Rumble or bitchute or banned video?
Note where I wrote, "(You can watch and listen for yourself on BitChute, Odysee, or Rumble.)" Click on the links.
Thank goodness....BTW, getting a video kicked off of You Tube is like a badge of honor.
Well deserved Jessica Hockett.
Very well deserved. Even if you can't pin the badge to your clothes!
thank you