Five years ago today the World Health Organization (WHO) decided emergency notices from the Wuhan Municipal Health Committee (WHC) about “unexplained pneumonia” were important enough to issue an alert.
Thank you Jessica for your dogged determination discovering the probable way pandemic preparedness plotters perfected their plandemic after failing with Swine Flu 2009 and the various respiratory virus scares of the noughties and last century. Given his significant role in pandemic planning (eg Event 201 and similar table top exercises), his significant funding of and resultant influence over the WHO, regulatory bodies and the MSM coupled with his Pelosi-like success in trading stocks such as Pfizer and Moderna as well as his slippery PR neutering of his close relationship with Jeffery Epstein, I am in agreement with 2 brave artists who are calling for the prosecution and hopefully subsequent conviction of Bill Gates for any number of serious crimes against humanity and individual humans.
Of course we need many many more of his co-conspirators to face accountability too, but at least his head would be a start. That should make for a very Happy New Year for all of us.
Re: "Why does the WHO say “the origins of COVID-19” rather than “the origins of SARS-CoV-2”? Is it possible COVID-19 has a lab origin - technically speaking - but SARS-CoV-2 does not? Is SARS-CoV-2 merely an uploaded sequence of no real significance that is covering or acting as a decoy/distraction from something else?"
Yes, this SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 bizzo is interesting...
I asked a similar question in a BMJ rapid response in September 2020, see: Covid-19 vaccines...or SARS-CoV-2 vaccines? Clarification needed: https://www.bmj.com/content/370/bmj.m3258/rr-14
"I believe SARS-CoV-2 (whatever it is) and its corresponding shot were decoys, effectively, and themselves “countermeasures” for serious, ongoing, and compounding problems created by the flu shot and other vaccines and (possibly) fentanyl in the recreational and illicit drug supplies, and contaminated vaping agents."
The general traditional understand of a 'vaccine' for most people is that it will prevent them from getting sick. But what does this mean?
Prevent them getting an infection?
So in the case of 'SARS-CoV-2 virus infection', surely it should have been called a SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.
But then we know they admitted 'it doesn't prevent infection nor transmission', but will help prevent hospitalisation and death...against a disease it was admitted from the beginning wasn't a serious threat to most people, i.e. most people weren't at risk of hospitalisation and death...so why was the vaccine pressed upon most people?
As for calling it the 'COVID-19' vaccine, this would fit with preventing disease...but interesting to think they were calling it this pretty much from the beginning, which means they didn't think it was preventing infection nor transmission?
What a shambles...
The main point is there should never have been a 'vaccine solution' against a disease it was admitted from the beginning wasn't a serious threat to most people.
The whole thing is the most gigantic beat-up, which has resulted in the destruction of voluntary informed consent for vaccination, stolen likely trillions of dollars from the people, caused untold misery, injury and death, stolen freedom, etc.
The biggest crime of all time.
When will the perpetrators be formally identified and brought to account, along with their associates in governments, bureaucracies, the medical and scientific establishment, academia, the legal system, the mainstream media, and even the churches!
I, for one, am NOT in the 'no virus' and 'viruses don't exist' camps. - though I tend to think that whatever viruses are, they are not causal of illness but co-incidental to imbalance in an immune-compromised system. They don't "spread" but do circulate...within organisms, NOT within the air/environment.
I'm back at Square 1 with 2020: Why were we told something called SARS-CoV-2 was a threat? What scientific or medical evidence was presented? (None)
So while I agree with you that the "disease" wasn't presented as a threat to most people at the beginning, the fact that it was presented as a threat at all is the core problem.
Gates is a party to the crimes, but I think it's important to go after the most front-facing entity that is obviously responsible for coordinating what the public saw: The WHO
Re: "It makes no sense whatsoever for the WHO to activate emergency systems the day after hearing about unremarkable pneumonia cases during flu season. That they did so is strongly suggestive of ‘lying in wait’ for a go signal (i.e., a planned/staged event)."
Wow, it's so mind-boggling to think about...it was a staged event!!!
What has this cost the world? Who made all the money...that was stolen from the people, along with their freedom?
When are the criminals going to be brought to account?
Thank you Jessica for your dogged determination discovering the probable way pandemic preparedness plotters perfected their plandemic after failing with Swine Flu 2009 and the various respiratory virus scares of the noughties and last century. Given his significant role in pandemic planning (eg Event 201 and similar table top exercises), his significant funding of and resultant influence over the WHO, regulatory bodies and the MSM coupled with his Pelosi-like success in trading stocks such as Pfizer and Moderna as well as his slippery PR neutering of his close relationship with Jeffery Epstein, I am in agreement with 2 brave artists who are calling for the prosecution and hopefully subsequent conviction of Bill Gates for any number of serious crimes against humanity and individual humans.
Five Times August - Gates Behind The Bars
https://rumble.com/v28n8to-gates-behind-the-bars.html
Bob Moran - How To Prevent The Next pandemic
https://www.bobmoran.co.uk/prints/prison-gates-print
Of course we need many many more of his co-conspirators to face accountability too, but at least his head would be a start. That should make for a very Happy New Year for all of us.
Re: "Why does the WHO say “the origins of COVID-19” rather than “the origins of SARS-CoV-2”? Is it possible COVID-19 has a lab origin - technically speaking - but SARS-CoV-2 does not? Is SARS-CoV-2 merely an uploaded sequence of no real significance that is covering or acting as a decoy/distraction from something else?"
Yes, this SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 bizzo is interesting...
I asked a similar question in a BMJ rapid response in September 2020, see: Covid-19 vaccines...or SARS-CoV-2 vaccines? Clarification needed: https://www.bmj.com/content/370/bmj.m3258/rr-14
And while most people call the vaccines 'COVID-19 vaccines', Fauci and colleagues called them 'SARS-CoV-2 vaccines' in their article published in January 2023, which basically admitted the vaccines were rubbish, see my email to them: The biggest crime in history...the influenza and SARS-CoV-2 vaccine scam, 27 April 2023: https://vaccinationispolitical.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/the-biggest-crime-in-history.the-influenza-and-sars-cov-2-vaccine-scam.pdf
Excellent catch in 2020, Elizabeth. Language matters. What's your take on why COVID-19 vs SARS-CoV-2 with the shots?
I think we have a similar view re: the flu racket, with some distinctions.
ICYMI: https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/what-do-i-think-about-the-covid-shot
"I believe SARS-CoV-2 (whatever it is) and its corresponding shot were decoys, effectively, and themselves “countermeasures” for serious, ongoing, and compounding problems created by the flu shot and other vaccines and (possibly) fentanyl in the recreational and illicit drug supplies, and contaminated vaping agents."
Yes Jessica, language matters.
The general traditional understand of a 'vaccine' for most people is that it will prevent them from getting sick. But what does this mean?
Prevent them getting an infection?
So in the case of 'SARS-CoV-2 virus infection', surely it should have been called a SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.
But then we know they admitted 'it doesn't prevent infection nor transmission', but will help prevent hospitalisation and death...against a disease it was admitted from the beginning wasn't a serious threat to most people, i.e. most people weren't at risk of hospitalisation and death...so why was the vaccine pressed upon most people?
As for calling it the 'COVID-19' vaccine, this would fit with preventing disease...but interesting to think they were calling it this pretty much from the beginning, which means they didn't think it was preventing infection nor transmission?
What a shambles...
The main point is there should never have been a 'vaccine solution' against a disease it was admitted from the beginning wasn't a serious threat to most people.
Who is responsible for initiating the 'vaccine solution'... Looks like Bill Gates is in the frame: "...we need to make the vaccine available to almost every person on the planet": https://elizabethhart.substack.com/p/we-need-to-make-the-vaccine-available
The whole thing is the most gigantic beat-up, which has resulted in the destruction of voluntary informed consent for vaccination, stolen likely trillions of dollars from the people, caused untold misery, injury and death, stolen freedom, etc.
The biggest crime of all time.
When will the perpetrators be formally identified and brought to account, along with their associates in governments, bureaucracies, the medical and scientific establishment, academia, the legal system, the mainstream media, and even the churches!
What's an infection? Whence viruses?
I, for one, am NOT in the 'no virus' and 'viruses don't exist' camps. - though I tend to think that whatever viruses are, they are not causal of illness but co-incidental to imbalance in an immune-compromised system. They don't "spread" but do circulate...within organisms, NOT within the air/environment.
I'm back at Square 1 with 2020: Why were we told something called SARS-CoV-2 was a threat? What scientific or medical evidence was presented? (None)
So while I agree with you that the "disease" wasn't presented as a threat to most people at the beginning, the fact that it was presented as a threat at all is the core problem.
Gates is a party to the crimes, but I think it's important to go after the most front-facing entity that is obviously responsible for coordinating what the public saw: The WHO
Unknown Virus Rampages in China; Hospitals Utterly Overwhelmed
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k-IGSdSow4A
Ignore
How can I relax? We're running out of time!
.
The Hidden Timer That Kills Every Species
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lt4uIFjVFS0
𖦹˖°.👻 ̟࿔*:⋆
Re: "It makes no sense whatsoever for the WHO to activate emergency systems the day after hearing about unremarkable pneumonia cases during flu season. That they did so is strongly suggestive of ‘lying in wait’ for a go signal (i.e., a planned/staged event)."
Wow, it's so mind-boggling to think about...it was a staged event!!!
What has this cost the world? Who made all the money...that was stolen from the people, along with their freedom?
When are the criminals going to be brought to account?
"Who made all the money?"
Not me! Not you either, I'm guessing!