I posted a comment tonight on Carl Heneghan and Tom Jefferson's "Trust the Evidence" Substack, because they had written about Antonio Porto's testimony in December, and about the manipulation/staging involving the coffins: https://trusttheevidence.substack.com/p/revisiting-the-pictures-of-doom
Full text of comment below:
Hello Gentlemen.
TY for your ongoing work.
FYI, Jonathan Engler and I spoke to Antonio Porto. As we inferred from his testimony to the Commission, he was NOT confirming the number of coffins on the trucks of Bergamo. See our full article posted today: https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/did-the-trucks-of-bergamo-carry-only
It seems people are not quite making the leap between the propaganda, i.e., staging and manipulation involving the coffins, trucks, etc., as "evidence of absence" that the purported death events did not occur as depicted by official data.
Part of the challenge, in our opinion, may be a failure to grasp the full magnitude and scale of these mass casualty events. You cite the shipwreck as having been 359 deaths. That's the rough equivalent of the peak day of deaths in Bergamo - which was preceded and followed by day after after day of deaths in the triple digits. We are talking about a place that normally experiences ~31 deaths a day claiming that a nearly 1,000% increase happened in 22 days.
To date, we are among the very few analysts who continue to investigate, critically examine, and raise questions about these "Twin Peaks" - which we believe are (in part) feats of data engineering that do not reflect real-time, on-the-ground events.
It seems to us that people on "all sides" of the COVID debate are loathe to robustly examine or discuss the early events, perhaps due to what the truth about what occurred may reveal not only about pandemic claims, but about decades of claims about spreading respiratory diseases and the need/efficacy/relative harmlessness of seasonal and other shots.
No coincidence also that Bergamo’s Covid drama involved the ‘overwhelming’ of a state of the art hospital (The Papa Giovanni XXIII the centre point of this city’s story), just like the ‘supposed overwhelming’ of the state of the art Elmhurst hospital in NYC (also the centre point of the city’s story). Guess it adds a further frisson of terror to the event.
This nice chap has also helpfully written a timeline of events from early to mid 2020 of the drama in both Bergamo and Italy. His experience as a behavioural scientist no doubt has been very useful! Here’s his bio “ Matteo M Galizzi is Associate Professor of Behavioural Science and Co-Director of the Executive MSc in Behavioural Science at the LSE. He is affiliated to the Department of Psychological and Behavioural Science, and is in the Steering Groups of the LSE Global Health Initiative and of the LSE Behavioural Science Hub. Matteo is an experimental and behavioural economist conducting randomised controlled experiments in the area of health and public policy”. Here’s his article, with the hyperlinks to ‘Bergamo’ and ‘Italy’ leading to the timelines. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/globalhealth/2020/12/15/12-days-of-global-health-why-we-should-not-forget-what-happened-in-bergamo/
This is its own kind of 'interesting' and helpful in many regards as an artifact.
"The various current estimates range in an interval between 8,000 and 12,000 deaths in Bergamo only, which is the same total number of deaths as in some entire countries such as Canada or the Netherlands, for example. Everyone I know from Bergamo – including myself – has lost someone because of COVID-19, and their losses were often amplified by the fact that they could not be there while their parents, relatives, partners, or friends were dying alone in hospitals or ICUs. It was not just me but the entire world that watched in shock as the deaths in Bergamo became so many that military trucks had to carry the coffins for cremation to other provinces – with no funerals for their mourning families – an unprecedented scene in peace time."
Yes I spotted that. It’s very concerning that he is now a published author (both book and papers) on how policy impacts response, and the preference is for greater centralisation, particularly in dealing with pandemics (because he knows another one is coming along sometime). It’s almost like he was writing about the WHO’s Pandemic Preparedness Treaty, before even the WHO had mentioned it! https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851021001974?via%3Dihub#bib0046
I posted a comment tonight on Carl Heneghan and Tom Jefferson's "Trust the Evidence" Substack, because they had written about Antonio Porto's testimony in December, and about the manipulation/staging involving the coffins: https://trusttheevidence.substack.com/p/revisiting-the-pictures-of-doom
Full text of comment below:
Hello Gentlemen.
TY for your ongoing work.
FYI, Jonathan Engler and I spoke to Antonio Porto. As we inferred from his testimony to the Commission, he was NOT confirming the number of coffins on the trucks of Bergamo. See our full article posted today: https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/did-the-trucks-of-bergamo-carry-only
You may be aware that we have asserted the daily all-cause death curves in Bergamo Province and New York City are fraudulent. https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/yes-we-believe-the-bergamo-italy and https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/new-york-city-spring-2020-an-unsubstantiated
It seems people are not quite making the leap between the propaganda, i.e., staging and manipulation involving the coffins, trucks, etc., as "evidence of absence" that the purported death events did not occur as depicted by official data.
Part of the challenge, in our opinion, may be a failure to grasp the full magnitude and scale of these mass casualty events. You cite the shipwreck as having been 359 deaths. That's the rough equivalent of the peak day of deaths in Bergamo - which was preceded and followed by day after after day of deaths in the triple digits. We are talking about a place that normally experiences ~31 deaths a day claiming that a nearly 1,000% increase happened in 22 days.
To date, we are among the very few analysts who continue to investigate, critically examine, and raise questions about these "Twin Peaks" - which we believe are (in part) feats of data engineering that do not reflect real-time, on-the-ground events.
It seems to us that people on "all sides" of the COVID debate are loathe to robustly examine or discuss the early events, perhaps due to what the truth about what occurred may reveal not only about pandemic claims, but about decades of claims about spreading respiratory diseases and the need/efficacy/relative harmlessness of seasonal and other shots.
As Note: https://substack.com/@jessicahockett/note/c-86625909?utm_source=notes-share-action&r=jjay255
As comment on article: https://open.substack.com/pub/trusttheevidence/p/revisiting-the-pictures-of-doom?r=jjay2&utm_campaign=comment-list-share-cta&utm_medium=web&comments=true&commentId=86625912
Attempt to contact Carl Heneghan via X on 17 Jan 2025, with request that TTE article be amended for accuracy: https://x.com/JAHockett76/status/1880289501718737369
No coincidence also that Bergamo’s Covid drama involved the ‘overwhelming’ of a state of the art hospital (The Papa Giovanni XXIII the centre point of this city’s story), just like the ‘supposed overwhelming’ of the state of the art Elmhurst hospital in NYC (also the centre point of the city’s story). Guess it adds a further frisson of terror to the event.
Yep. Working on something related to that.
Long to-do list over here... 😉
This nice chap has also helpfully written a timeline of events from early to mid 2020 of the drama in both Bergamo and Italy. His experience as a behavioural scientist no doubt has been very useful! Here’s his bio “ Matteo M Galizzi is Associate Professor of Behavioural Science and Co-Director of the Executive MSc in Behavioural Science at the LSE. He is affiliated to the Department of Psychological and Behavioural Science, and is in the Steering Groups of the LSE Global Health Initiative and of the LSE Behavioural Science Hub. Matteo is an experimental and behavioural economist conducting randomised controlled experiments in the area of health and public policy”. Here’s his article, with the hyperlinks to ‘Bergamo’ and ‘Italy’ leading to the timelines. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/globalhealth/2020/12/15/12-days-of-global-health-why-we-should-not-forget-what-happened-in-bergamo/
Thanks Domini
This is its own kind of 'interesting' and helpful in many regards as an artifact.
"The various current estimates range in an interval between 8,000 and 12,000 deaths in Bergamo only, which is the same total number of deaths as in some entire countries such as Canada or the Netherlands, for example. Everyone I know from Bergamo – including myself – has lost someone because of COVID-19, and their losses were often amplified by the fact that they could not be there while their parents, relatives, partners, or friends were dying alone in hospitals or ICUs. It was not just me but the entire world that watched in shock as the deaths in Bergamo became so many that military trucks had to carry the coffins for cremation to other provinces – with no funerals for their mourning families – an unprecedented scene in peace time."
🤥
Yes I spotted that. It’s very concerning that he is now a published author (both book and papers) on how policy impacts response, and the preference is for greater centralisation, particularly in dealing with pandemics (because he knows another one is coming along sometime). It’s almost like he was writing about the WHO’s Pandemic Preparedness Treaty, before even the WHO had mentioned it! https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851021001974?via%3Dihub#bib0046