Reading testimony submitted by University of Oxford professor Sunetra Gupta to the UK COVID Inquiry in 2023, I encountered statements related to her U.S.
Yes, I figured it's different, which is why I put this out there.
Can you point me to the relevant statute(s)?
You make a great point about Prof Gupta joining me. Although I disagree strongly with many of her views, I've written about them in a fairly "academic" fashion and have told associates and friends/family many times that I consider her to be very intelligent and consistent (from an intellectual integrity/scholarship point of view).
I watched every session of the Stanford "Next Pandemic" conference that took place in October 2024. She was head and shoulders above everyone..and incredibly savvy besides.
Given her views about the welfare state and much else, I put it on the Trump 1.0 administration and AIER to explain why she was selected as an advisor. (Again, she holds the views she holds and isn't shy in writing or speaking about what those are.)
I think the conference you are referring to was 2024 (Oct *2024* -- not *2020*). It's just an innocent typo/brain furt by you (that I'm compelled to correct).
As to why "pinko" Dr. Gupta was singled out (given all the "gin joints"), I'm baffled/in the dark. I can speculate all day, but that's all I got: speculation. Unfortunately.
This denial reminds me a bit of the one Cambridge issued for Norman Fenton's request.
https://wherearethenumbers.substack.com/p/academic-fear-mongering-update
https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/a-good-example-of-why-the-covid-19
https://sanityunleashed.substack.com/p/someone-is-sponsoring-an-entire-programme
https://wherearethenumbers.substack.com/p/only-we-can-save-the-world
FOIA is different in the UK and distress is a valid grounds.
I’m guessing the good doctor is not willing to join you in requesting the release of these records? That would certainly undermine the objections.
Yes, I figured it's different, which is why I put this out there.
Can you point me to the relevant statute(s)?
You make a great point about Prof Gupta joining me. Although I disagree strongly with many of her views, I've written about them in a fairly "academic" fashion and have told associates and friends/family many times that I consider her to be very intelligent and consistent (from an intellectual integrity/scholarship point of view).
I watched every session of the Stanford "Next Pandemic" conference that took place in October 2024. She was head and shoulders above everyone..and incredibly savvy besides.
Given her views about the welfare state and much else, I put it on the Trump 1.0 administration and AIER to explain why she was selected as an advisor. (Again, she holds the views she holds and isn't shy in writing or speaking about what those are.)
I think the conference you are referring to was 2024 (Oct *2024* -- not *2020*). It's just an innocent typo/brain furt by you (that I'm compelled to correct).
As to why "pinko" Dr. Gupta was singled out (given all the "gin joints"), I'm baffled/in the dark. I can speculate all day, but that's all I got: speculation. Unfortunately.
Keep barking, Ms. Jessica!
Edited, thanks
Prof Gupta does not challenge the govt's core story and is a flu shot researcher/developer.
Bhattacharya and Kuldorff also have flu shot interests etc prior to 2020.
I am not going to stop saying this, even though I know it is very threatening to many people.
Some people cannot see something so apparent to the rest of us that are naturally aware.
They can be geniuses yet blind to things.
https://robc137.substack.com/p/left-brain-vs-whole-brain-in-battlestar