A highlight of my week was being Jeremiah Hosea’s guest on “The Bassline” — a weekly show focused on culture and politics with a penchant for the medical freedom conversation.
Great interview. I think, because you are not directly in the medical system, it gives you an unbiased vision. In contrast, healthcare folks are crippled by their prior education and training, blinding them.
Thanks! I agree that expertise can be blinding and the non-expert can come into a situation and see/wonder things because they are unhindered by certain knowledge and experiences.
My experiences in schools/school systems and restaurants helps with the "systematic" elements, however. Hospitals, schools, and restaurants all involve humans managing environments and services where the inputs/outputs are humans.
"Having been a part of various formal and informal “groups” myself over the past four years, I think the most disturbing pattern I’ve observed more recently is the contempt & disregard some COVID-Resisting scientists & doctors arrogantly express toward the questions and contributions of anyone who isn’t a “real” scientist or medical professional. (That includes people who were onto the Pandemic Scam earlier than most.)
Expert Blindness can be…blinding. It therefore seems rather short-sighted to assume that the same fields that helped get us into this mess are the way out, or the only way out. If I know one thing from my own field of study it’s that people outside of a particular discipline who are not encumbered by or entrenched in certain beliefs or accepted ways of thinking can help illuminate a problem, or raise a possibility that wouldn’t otherwise be considered.
Galileo rightly observed,
"In the sciences, the authority of thousands of opinions is not worth as much as one tiny spark of reason in an individual man."
The words of Erwin Schrödinger also apply to the ongoing study of the COVID-19 event:
"The task is not so much to see what no one has yet seen; but to think what nobody has yet thought, about that which everybody sees."
In the case of Presumptive Pandemics, I suspect the task is to think what nobody wants to think about that which nobody has ever seen, yet has been made to believe they have.
Terrific recap of your investigative work, highlighted questions not asked (by many), and discussion of general covid event artifacts. You both discuss your opinions and questions so gracefully (even though you say you were more intense). Even all these years later I still struggle to keep my disdain out of my discourse - which automatically turns folks off. I will never get over what happened to us so thank you both so much for keeping these issues alive.
I am not on the "they did it to remove Trump" train - and need to write an article about that at some point.
Briefly,
1) It's too US centric,
2) it ignores the global coordination and (worse) suggests that an event of such a scale would be done chiefly to remove a man who (at most) had four more years in the office,
3) DJT was the PERFECT president for the Pandemic Hyperreality TV Show.
There are better arguments to be made for him winning in 2016 BECAUSE of an upcoming Pandemic Event. It simply does NOT getting any better for "War Against Invisible Enemy" than New Yorker Donald Trump.
And some people believe MORE than the stated number died.
A point of my comparison, however, has been that - regardless of the number of people who died in the WTC disaster - the collapse of skyscrapers was an observed event and an event that could/would reasonably kill thousands.
In spring 2020, by contrast, we have ten times that number in excess casualties reported for New York City, and no observed even t(s) commensurate with the toll.
Jessica,
Great interview. I think, because you are not directly in the medical system, it gives you an unbiased vision. In contrast, healthcare folks are crippled by their prior education and training, blinding them.
Laura Kragie MD. biomedworks.substack.com
Thanks! I agree that expertise can be blinding and the non-expert can come into a situation and see/wonder things because they are unhindered by certain knowledge and experiences.
My experiences in schools/school systems and restaurants helps with the "systematic" elements, however. Hospitals, schools, and restaurants all involve humans managing environments and services where the inputs/outputs are humans.
Related, from the final section of this article https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/the-norfolk-groups-presumptive-pandemic
-------------------------------------------------
"Having been a part of various formal and informal “groups” myself over the past four years, I think the most disturbing pattern I’ve observed more recently is the contempt & disregard some COVID-Resisting scientists & doctors arrogantly express toward the questions and contributions of anyone who isn’t a “real” scientist or medical professional. (That includes people who were onto the Pandemic Scam earlier than most.)
Expert Blindness can be…blinding. It therefore seems rather short-sighted to assume that the same fields that helped get us into this mess are the way out, or the only way out. If I know one thing from my own field of study it’s that people outside of a particular discipline who are not encumbered by or entrenched in certain beliefs or accepted ways of thinking can help illuminate a problem, or raise a possibility that wouldn’t otherwise be considered.
Galileo rightly observed,
"In the sciences, the authority of thousands of opinions is not worth as much as one tiny spark of reason in an individual man."
The words of Erwin Schrödinger also apply to the ongoing study of the COVID-19 event:
"The task is not so much to see what no one has yet seen; but to think what nobody has yet thought, about that which everybody sees."
In the case of Presumptive Pandemics, I suspect the task is to think what nobody wants to think about that which nobody has ever seen, yet has been made to believe they have.
Terrific recap of your investigative work, highlighted questions not asked (by many), and discussion of general covid event artifacts. You both discuss your opinions and questions so gracefully (even though you say you were more intense). Even all these years later I still struggle to keep my disdain out of my discourse - which automatically turns folks off. I will never get over what happened to us so thank you both so much for keeping these issues alive.
Thanks! I agree there was mutual respect and balance - how an actual conversation should be!
re: voice - I meant my voice is more intense and my tone/accent annoying; he is more mellow and easier to listen to!
What a difference it was speaking with him versus speaking with fellow New Yorker Naomi Wolf! https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/we-think-the-nyc-2020-death-all-cause
Good show! But the main reason they rolled out the WuFlu pandemic psyop in 2020 was to defeat Trump.
Thanks!
I am not on the "they did it to remove Trump" train - and need to write an article about that at some point.
Briefly,
1) It's too US centric,
2) it ignores the global coordination and (worse) suggests that an event of such a scale would be done chiefly to remove a man who (at most) had four more years in the office,
3) DJT was the PERFECT president for the Pandemic Hyperreality TV Show.
There are better arguments to be made for him winning in 2016 BECAUSE of an upcoming Pandemic Event. It simply does NOT getting any better for "War Against Invisible Enemy" than New Yorker Donald Trump.
2020 is being protected by a Uniparty.
For more on motive, see here: https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/motive-for-pandemic-casualty-event
What is absurd is that ANYONE is still pretending something spread
At this stage! ???
Bergamo Italy did a mass vaccination using MRNA flu shots in the fall of 2019.
There is no virus, no contagion, just poisoning.
https://www.perplexity.ai/search/was-there-a-mass-flu-vaccinati-eDepfS3.QF.V_hRmDk_7rg
Yes I know about this.
Still left with a timing problem. All things are possible with fraud
Not everyone agrees thousands died on 9/11.
https://shortfake.com/vicsim
And some people believe MORE than the stated number died.
A point of my comparison, however, has been that - regardless of the number of people who died in the WTC disaster - the collapse of skyscrapers was an observed event and an event that could/would reasonably kill thousands.
In spring 2020, by contrast, we have ten times that number in excess casualties reported for New York City, and no observed even t(s) commensurate with the toll.
Please read the report.
ALL the victims were simulated.
There are 11 different ways to do so - at least.
https://shortfake.com/11
We observed pre-packaged video footage on 9/11
https://shortfake.com/sc
Back then we could query the SSDI.
The SSDI registered the same number ~400 people dying on 9/11, 9/12, 9/13 2001 in New York State.
Thanks. Not my rabbit hole at this time but I will take a look when I can for related content
Thanks for keeping the links. Most delete them and won't address the elephant in the room.
Agree about the video footage, and other aspects of fakery.
But as Jessica points out, the collapse of the those enormous towers would certainly kill/injure people.
Not all victims were simulated. I knew three. One escaped with injuries.
Two didn't come home.
Read the vicsim report. What are their names?
CDI doesn't kill people when they take down buildings.