Exactly Jessica. There is no "Step 7" in your formula, but it is no big deal. My field of work for almost 40 years has been Epidemiology-Preventive Medicine. In 2020, I got tired of telling all my colleagues that what you describe was exactly what was happening. It should have been obvious to anyone in our field; we have known for decades what happens when you equate a "test result" with a "disease". There are countless examples in the past of pseudo "epidemics". But for some reason, none of my peers listened to me; they all subscribed to the "pandemic" panic. You give me hope that there are still some people with enough noodle inside the skull to be able to figure this out. Thanks for all your work.
I've also been saying from beginning why are they testing healthy people?? Then correlating finding germs in the nose with a 'deadly disease'. Ask any MD to give a definitive disease diagnosis with ONLY a single lab and NO clinical correlation. prior to 2020 they'd look at you like you were crazy.
You are correct; as you say, to a (much) lower magnitude. I don't remember ever seeing a doctor ordering a "flu test" for a patient who did not have "flu" symptoms.
yet in 2009 H1N1 pandemic it was ordered to STOP testing no symptom people? why? because + test doesn't mean 'sick' without clinical correlation. Studies of MRSA/VRE in community (previously only found inhospitals) is much more pervasive when 'testing' is done yet it doesn't mean you need treatment-it's colonized and not infectious (per ID doctors)
I'm far more resistant now than I was in 2021-2022 wrt pointing to the H1N1 scam as a good example of anything, because I came to regard it as a "proof of concept"/readiness exercise for 2020.
Exactly right Monyka! I would add that they are not finding "germs" in the nose; they are finding "fragments of a RNA molecule" that "could" belong to a "germ" (virus). As you say, prior to 2020 it would be crazy to do such a test on someone who was not (very) sick. And unfortunately, the majority of MDs (my dear colleagues) changed overnight what they had done during all their careers. It is a great shame.
Listen to the Rogan podcast with Mike Benz that dropped today. They spend hours (I am still listening) detailing the unshackled Psyops and no-holds-barred dirty tricks played by the CIA, USAID, and related actors against the American people (and in fact the world) throughout history. They agree that the "pandemic" was orchestrated - BUT - they cannot get themselves to consider that there never was a novel pathogen. They can only consider the scenario where "GOF did it." That these agencies funded creation of "it' - but they aren't sure if they intentionally created "it" to harm the world and create a pandemic - maybe the "pandemic" was an accident. Isn't it far more parsimonious, especially in light of the corruption, control and callous they detail, that said agencies just created the STORY out of whole cloth as opposed to creating an "IT" that spreads around the world and kills millions? As you show, no one need create a pathogen if they control media, government and medical institutions. Rogan and Benz are totally on board with that control, yet still cling to "it." Many folks who have resisted the orchestrated pandemic explanation don't believe that there could realistically be a "smoke filled room with shady Blofeld characters" manipulating the world. Now we see that has been happening for decades, and we know who they are. Yet... "they created a GOF virus so they could shut down the world and transfer wealth bla bla bla!" They created a script boys, and they released THAT on the world. No virus (outside of the psychological kind) required.
Bros With Shows give me a headache, but I'll give it a whirl on high speed during a bike ride. :)
Here's what I don't get: People readily accept the transmitting bioweapon agent idea, whilst insisting on how difficult it would be to manipulate numbers in a database.
Just one tentacle. Benz said it will take decades to unravel it all. So probably not. But public opinion will be shifting if the revelations keep coming.
8 Oct 2014 — A dog named Excalibur who belonged to an Ebola-infected nurse was destroyed on Wednesday, even as protesters and animal rights activists surrounded the Madrid ...
Add on top the government behavioural psychologists' best fear porn messaging widely disseminated by mainstream media and the fake pandemic exploded in a gigantic airburst all over us. Evil genius move really. How many will learn the "fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me" lesson you've brilliantly laid out here?
I agree that there was 'fear porn' but I think a lot of people miss how much entertainment there was - and the "we're all in this together, this is sort of fun" rah rah spirit in those initial weeks when an alleged 27,000 extra people were killed in New York.
In the U.S., at least, people were bribed with the idea that it was only going to be two weeks. And I do mean bribed: Government sent checks to us and most of the professional/executive class was perfectly fine with being told to "stay home, save lives." I know multiple families who say they look back on spring 2020 with fondness/appreciation because it gave them more time with kids, a break from the grind, etc.
Much of the fear I witnessed in those early days was fear of not seeming virtuous...
In the UK life in the lockdown early weeks was good for those who had a nice home, garden and working from home or furlough privileges but, as early as 22 March 2020, the government’s SPI-B (behavioural insights) sub-committee of SAGE (the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies) recommended “the perceived level of personal threat needs to be increased among those who are complacent, using hard-hitting emotional messaging” as “A substantial number of people still do not feel sufficiently personally threatened”. From that point on it was obviously government policy to attempt to scare the pants of the people by amongst other things the
doom laden daily death data announcements
STAY HOME - PROTECT THE NHS - SAVE LIVES stern messaging
“Don’t Kill Granny” campaign - ironic given the state-sponsored euthanasia via Midazolam regime in elderly care homes and hospitals
So we shouldn't forget that the fakery of the PCR created "pandemic" was very much backed up by state-sponsored, military/security agency-grade psychological weaponry used on an unsuspecting public.
For sure re: Grade A Psychological Weaponry; I simply think it's a mistake when people (not you) limit or exaggerate such weaponry to the kind that induced fear and anxiety.
Those of us who chucked it found life was normal and no screaming sirens anywhere.
Traveled to Florida (total of ~6 weeks from june-dec), South Dakota, Wyoming, Utah, Washington-all in 2020. Oh and the parties at Lake of Ozark. We spent a lot of time on the lake with friends on our boat. Funny how not a single one of us got sick...
I might add that all it would take for an unplanned and un-staged scenario is:
1. An academic world funded by big pharma
2. Doctors locked into following stated protocols rather than their own skilled judgment.
3. Medical journals captured.
4. A basic scientific flaw in our understanding of viral sequences.
5. A society that fears disease and death.
6. One small but normal outbreak of some ILI somewhere, followed by a published paper that incorrectly attributes it to a novel virus - the error arising from ignorance of human illness coupled with normal medical arrogance and the error of point #5 above.
7. A massive media enterprise believed by the majority that decides to exaggerate the claims and facts in order to sensationalize the event and get views.
8. Everyone involved and that knew better living in fear of being culpable, so crushing all opposition.
9. Big pharma capitalizing on the whole mess.
In this scenario, the whole thing (including almost all of your steps) will happen automatically as a result of the way our civilization and institutions work.
"One small but normal outbreak of some ILI somewhere, followed by a published paper that incorrectly attributes it to a novel virus - the error arising from ignorance of human illness coupled with normal medical arrogance and the error of point #5 above."
All points in my proposed scenario are, as far as I can tell, accurate descriptions of the state of things. Point #6, which you quote, I wrote as a brief summary of what happened in Wuhan: a few people got sick (as they always do every year), with typical symptoms (the kind people face every year), and researchers attempted to identify (as they have been doing for decades) the sequence of the virus causing this minor outbreak. Then, and with some hesitation (the Chinese report made it clear they had not proven this sequence was the cause of the minor outbreak) they posted their sequence online (as 100s of 1000s of other researchers do regularly).
The "error of point #5" refers to the serious scientific flaws with sequencing - which depends on deBruijn graphs, and so produces a sequence that is the shortest possible summary containing all known fragments, which therefore may or may not be anything like what really exists in nature.
All of the points are accurate descriptions of the state of things and (I think you'd agree) neither affirm nor challenge the assertion that the pandemic was planned and/or staged.
Thanks for clarifying re 6) - I thought it was a summary of Wuhan but wanted to make sure. I agree that, in some ways, what was being done is what had been done previously. We agree that the Chinese report did not prove causality. Causality has never been demonstrated, as far as I can tell - nor has the novelty or uniqueness of a disease the WHO called COVID-19.
I am troubled by the (typical) definition of outbreak as applied to the agents called viruses and don't think the clustered incidence of respiratory illness should be characterized as an outbreak.
So I suppose the critical question is: was someone out there smart enough to realize that our society was in this precarious situation, and also devious enough to think to get the ball rolling, and also feeling lucky enough to think he could profit from what was sure to result in 3 years of worldwide chaos?
Or did it happen because our systems sort of guaranteed it would eventually happen at some point?
Or was God actively humbling the great pride of the medical world, showing how ignorant and foolish they were, all the while holding out to professing Christians how dead their churches were that they should shut down for many months out of fear of a renamed cold?
"Or did it happen because our systems sort of guaranteed it would eventually happen at some point?"
Think this is it with added effect of social media/24 hours news competing for ratings/propelling fear mongers to fame caused this. It couldn't have happened otherwise. once that snow ball gets rolling it doesn't take much anymore for it to become an avalanche. Of course no one has the guts to admit it now that they were suckered in.
It shows clearly that none of it would have been possible without PCR testing.
Even in April last year when my 91 year old father-in-law was in hospital here in the UK with a few serious health issues (including cancer) they were still carrying out PCR tests on the patients. After a week in hospital he tested ‘positive’ and when he sadly died a few days later the medical examiner attempted to put ‘Covid’ as a cause of death. My wife refused to accept it and the hospital reluctantly agreed to remove it.
I had previously submitted a Freedom of Information request to my local NHS trust asking them the cycle threshold used for their PCR testing and they confirmed they had used 45 cycles as standard.
Thing is, using a test to blame deaths on a virus wasn't new. It had been practiced for many years. With SARS, MERS, and H1N1, of course, but on a more mundane level that no one likes to talk about, with seasonal flu.
Assuming this is precisely correct. With the same conciseness, could you append to the piece a list of the precise motivations of those who took those actions?
Hmmmm SARS cov2 found in March 2019....And a year later we have a 'test' detecting a BRAND NEW deadly disease...that docs were told to NOT treat like other respiratory illnesses....
Exactly Jessica. There is no "Step 7" in your formula, but it is no big deal. My field of work for almost 40 years has been Epidemiology-Preventive Medicine. In 2020, I got tired of telling all my colleagues that what you describe was exactly what was happening. It should have been obvious to anyone in our field; we have known for decades what happens when you equate a "test result" with a "disease". There are countless examples in the past of pseudo "epidemics". But for some reason, none of my peers listened to me; they all subscribed to the "pandemic" panic. You give me hope that there are still some people with enough noodle inside the skull to be able to figure this out. Thanks for all your work.
Thanks and you're welcome - typo fixed.
I've also been saying from beginning why are they testing healthy people?? Then correlating finding germs in the nose with a 'deadly disease'. Ask any MD to give a definitive disease diagnosis with ONLY a single lab and NO clinical correlation. prior to 2020 they'd look at you like you were crazy.
Not true, exactly
The same scheme was being done with PCR flu tests, just at a lower magnitude
You are correct; as you say, to a (much) lower magnitude. I don't remember ever seeing a doctor ordering a "flu test" for a patient who did not have "flu" symptoms.
Actually, there is some pretty strong suggestion in Chicago flu surveillance reports that this was being done pre-2020.
Not saying everywhere, but trial-run in big cities makes perfect sense.
Also, plenty of patients were given RVPs pre 2020.
yet in 2009 H1N1 pandemic it was ordered to STOP testing no symptom people? why? because + test doesn't mean 'sick' without clinical correlation. Studies of MRSA/VRE in community (previously only found inhospitals) is much more pervasive when 'testing' is done yet it doesn't mean you need treatment-it's colonized and not infectious (per ID doctors)
I'm far more resistant now than I was in 2021-2022 wrt pointing to the H1N1 scam as a good example of anything, because I came to regard it as a "proof of concept"/readiness exercise for 2020.
ICYMI: https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/setting-the-stage-for-flus-disappearing (including pinned comment: https://open.substack.com/pub/woodhouse/p/setting-the-stage-for-flus-disappearing?r=jjay2&utm_campaign=comment-list-share-cta&utm_medium=web&comments=true&commentId=18001619)
Exactly right Monyka! I would add that they are not finding "germs" in the nose; they are finding "fragments of a RNA molecule" that "could" belong to a "germ" (virus). As you say, prior to 2020 it would be crazy to do such a test on someone who was not (very) sick. And unfortunately, the majority of MDs (my dear colleagues) changed overnight what they had done during all their careers. It is a great shame.
Listen to the Rogan podcast with Mike Benz that dropped today. They spend hours (I am still listening) detailing the unshackled Psyops and no-holds-barred dirty tricks played by the CIA, USAID, and related actors against the American people (and in fact the world) throughout history. They agree that the "pandemic" was orchestrated - BUT - they cannot get themselves to consider that there never was a novel pathogen. They can only consider the scenario where "GOF did it." That these agencies funded creation of "it' - but they aren't sure if they intentionally created "it" to harm the world and create a pandemic - maybe the "pandemic" was an accident. Isn't it far more parsimonious, especially in light of the corruption, control and callous they detail, that said agencies just created the STORY out of whole cloth as opposed to creating an "IT" that spreads around the world and kills millions? As you show, no one need create a pathogen if they control media, government and medical institutions. Rogan and Benz are totally on board with that control, yet still cling to "it." Many folks who have resisted the orchestrated pandemic explanation don't believe that there could realistically be a "smoke filled room with shady Blofeld characters" manipulating the world. Now we see that has been happening for decades, and we know who they are. Yet... "they created a GOF virus so they could shut down the world and transfer wealth bla bla bla!" They created a script boys, and they released THAT on the world. No virus (outside of the psychological kind) required.
Bros With Shows give me a headache, but I'll give it a whirl on high speed during a bike ride. :)
Here's what I don't get: People readily accept the transmitting bioweapon agent idea, whilst insisting on how difficult it would be to manipulate numbers in a database.
Does the TrumanShow just go away after removing USAID, or is USAID just the tip of the dark money iceberg?
Just one tentacle. Benz said it will take decades to unravel it all. So probably not. But public opinion will be shifting if the revelations keep coming.
What if a rogue Ai Machine captures the internets and puts us all in zombie apocalypse lockdown, first shooting our 'infected' pets...
Spain, Amid Protests, Destroys Dog of Ebola-Infected Nurse
https://www.nytimes.com › 2014/10/09 › science › ebol...
8 Oct 2014 — A dog named Excalibur who belonged to an Ebola-infected nurse was destroyed on Wednesday, even as protesters and animal rights activists surrounded the Madrid ...
The proper response to these is "proof-of-concept exercise"
Add on top the government behavioural psychologists' best fear porn messaging widely disseminated by mainstream media and the fake pandemic exploded in a gigantic airburst all over us. Evil genius move really. How many will learn the "fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me" lesson you've brilliantly laid out here?
Thanks, Trevor.
I agree that there was 'fear porn' but I think a lot of people miss how much entertainment there was - and the "we're all in this together, this is sort of fun" rah rah spirit in those initial weeks when an alleged 27,000 extra people were killed in New York.
In the U.S., at least, people were bribed with the idea that it was only going to be two weeks. And I do mean bribed: Government sent checks to us and most of the professional/executive class was perfectly fine with being told to "stay home, save lives." I know multiple families who say they look back on spring 2020 with fondness/appreciation because it gave them more time with kids, a break from the grind, etc.
Much of the fear I witnessed in those early days was fear of not seeming virtuous...
In the UK life in the lockdown early weeks was good for those who had a nice home, garden and working from home or furlough privileges but, as early as 22 March 2020, the government’s SPI-B (behavioural insights) sub-committee of SAGE (the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies) recommended “the perceived level of personal threat needs to be increased among those who are complacent, using hard-hitting emotional messaging” as “A substantial number of people still do not feel sufficiently personally threatened”. From that point on it was obviously government policy to attempt to scare the pants of the people by amongst other things the
doom laden daily death data announcements
STAY HOME - PROTECT THE NHS - SAVE LIVES stern messaging
“Don’t Kill Granny” campaign - ironic given the state-sponsored euthanasia via Midazolam regime in elderly care homes and hospitals
the harrowing “Look Them in The Eyes” campaign - https://dailysceptic.org/2024/04/24/who-was-responsible-for-the-look-them-in-the-eyes-campaign/
plotting "When do we deploy the new variant" https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/03/04/project-fear-covid-variant-lockdown-matt-hancock-whatsapp/
So we shouldn't forget that the fakery of the PCR created "pandemic" was very much backed up by state-sponsored, military/security agency-grade psychological weaponry used on an unsuspecting public.
For sure re: Grade A Psychological Weaponry; I simply think it's a mistake when people (not you) limit or exaggerate such weaponry to the kind that induced fear and anxiety.
It was far more complex than that.
Those of us who chucked it found life was normal and no screaming sirens anywhere.
Traveled to Florida (total of ~6 weeks from june-dec), South Dakota, Wyoming, Utah, Washington-all in 2020. Oh and the parties at Lake of Ozark. We spent a lot of time on the lake with friends on our boat. Funny how not a single one of us got sick...
Excellent, concise summary of the health emergency, mass societal control hoax.
I might add that all it would take for an unplanned and un-staged scenario is:
1. An academic world funded by big pharma
2. Doctors locked into following stated protocols rather than their own skilled judgment.
3. Medical journals captured.
4. A basic scientific flaw in our understanding of viral sequences.
5. A society that fears disease and death.
6. One small but normal outbreak of some ILI somewhere, followed by a published paper that incorrectly attributes it to a novel virus - the error arising from ignorance of human illness coupled with normal medical arrogance and the error of point #5 above.
7. A massive media enterprise believed by the majority that decides to exaggerate the claims and facts in order to sensationalize the event and get views.
8. Everyone involved and that knew better living in fear of being culpable, so crushing all opposition.
9. Big pharma capitalizing on the whole mess.
In this scenario, the whole thing (including almost all of your steps) will happen automatically as a result of the way our civilization and institutions work.
Let's focus on this:
"One small but normal outbreak of some ILI somewhere, followed by a published paper that incorrectly attributes it to a novel virus - the error arising from ignorance of human illness coupled with normal medical arrogance and the error of point #5 above."
Where?
What's an outbreak?
Outbreak determined by?
All points in my proposed scenario are, as far as I can tell, accurate descriptions of the state of things. Point #6, which you quote, I wrote as a brief summary of what happened in Wuhan: a few people got sick (as they always do every year), with typical symptoms (the kind people face every year), and researchers attempted to identify (as they have been doing for decades) the sequence of the virus causing this minor outbreak. Then, and with some hesitation (the Chinese report made it clear they had not proven this sequence was the cause of the minor outbreak) they posted their sequence online (as 100s of 1000s of other researchers do regularly).
The "error of point #5" refers to the serious scientific flaws with sequencing - which depends on deBruijn graphs, and so produces a sequence that is the shortest possible summary containing all known fragments, which therefore may or may not be anything like what really exists in nature.
All of the points are accurate descriptions of the state of things and (I think you'd agree) neither affirm nor challenge the assertion that the pandemic was planned and/or staged.
Thanks for clarifying re 6) - I thought it was a summary of Wuhan but wanted to make sure. I agree that, in some ways, what was being done is what had been done previously. We agree that the Chinese report did not prove causality. Causality has never been demonstrated, as far as I can tell - nor has the novelty or uniqueness of a disease the WHO called COVID-19.
I am troubled by the (typical) definition of outbreak as applied to the agents called viruses and don't think the clustered incidence of respiratory illness should be characterized as an outbreak.
So I suppose the critical question is: was someone out there smart enough to realize that our society was in this precarious situation, and also devious enough to think to get the ball rolling, and also feeling lucky enough to think he could profit from what was sure to result in 3 years of worldwide chaos?
Or did it happen because our systems sort of guaranteed it would eventually happen at some point?
Or was God actively humbling the great pride of the medical world, showing how ignorant and foolish they were, all the while holding out to professing Christians how dead their churches were that they should shut down for many months out of fear of a renamed cold?
I don't think any of what happened was by chance, incompetence, or stupidity. Inevitable due to sin and hubris? That's a separate question
God's Sovereign Will at work no matter what, and there is no shortage of evil scheming in the Bible, including by governing authorities.
"Being in a position to know and nevertheless shunning knowledge creates direct responsibility for the consequences - from the very beginning."
So wrote Albert Speer (Hitler's cabinet minister) while in prison after the Nuremberg trials.(p 63 of "Inside the third Reich" 1970).
Either way, therefore, lots of people in power are responsible for 2020.
🎯
And, as I have said about President Trump, whether they knew or didn't know, it's a problem.
"Or did it happen because our systems sort of guaranteed it would eventually happen at some point?"
Think this is it with added effect of social media/24 hours news competing for ratings/propelling fear mongers to fame caused this. It couldn't have happened otherwise. once that snow ball gets rolling it doesn't take much anymore for it to become an avalanche. Of course no one has the guts to admit it now that they were suckered in.
Accidents happen, especially when they been meticulously groomed, premeditated, to happen.
Exactly what I think happened too.
Frustating they are gjetting away with genocide.
This is an excellent breakdown thanks Jessica.
It shows clearly that none of it would have been possible without PCR testing.
Even in April last year when my 91 year old father-in-law was in hospital here in the UK with a few serious health issues (including cancer) they were still carrying out PCR tests on the patients. After a week in hospital he tested ‘positive’ and when he sadly died a few days later the medical examiner attempted to put ‘Covid’ as a cause of death. My wife refused to accept it and the hospital reluctantly agreed to remove it.
I had previously submitted a Freedom of Information request to my local NHS trust asking them the cycle threshold used for their PCR testing and they confirmed they had used 45 cycles as standard.
A test and a story.
Thing is, using a test to blame deaths on a virus wasn't new. It had been practiced for many years. With SARS, MERS, and H1N1, of course, but on a more mundane level that no one likes to talk about, with seasonal flu.
Take a very close look at Figure 14. Do you see what I see? https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/setting-the-stage-for-flus-disappearing
Using a PCR test to cover up actual causes of death is criminal https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/drug-overdose-suicide-and-other-accident
It looks as though there was increased testing for flu in 2018.
I feel embarrassed that I hadn’t heard of PCR testing prior to 2020.
Doesn't it, though? ;)
Assuming this is precisely correct. With the same conciseness, could you append to the piece a list of the precise motivations of those who took those actions?
Here you go: https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/motive-for-pandemic-casualty-event
I appreciate that. Thank you. Will read.
You gave me a good reason to do a short dedicated post on it.
Thanks
Yes
https://web.ub.edu/en/web/actualitat/w/sars-cov-2-detected-in-waste-waters-in-barcelona-on-march-12-2019
Hmmmm SARS cov2 found in March 2019....And a year later we have a 'test' detecting a BRAND NEW deadly disease...that docs were told to NOT treat like other respiratory illnesses....