Good post, thanks. The only real, objective, thing about the whole disaster was the vaccine. Also, who made all those PCR machines and how did they get to every clinic and hospital in the world so quickly and who did the testing? Were an army of testers suddenly employed to do it? In Seoul, where we live, there were queues down the street and around the corner everyday for years. Results came through in two days, or less. How is that possible? My guess is that the swabs were taken to a secret location and destroyed. Infection was decided randomly by a computer at a pre - decided rate appropriate for the current state of propaganda deemed appropriate. I was very ( I do not use that word lightly) scared of the vaccine and stopped my family from taking it, and tried to dissuade everybody I knew also. I was also scared of the PCR test. I was forced to take it three times for air travel. I was well aware that the test could be used to force the vaccine on me. Where are all those PCR machines now? I don't think they ever existed. The next time they decide there is a pandemic it will be for a supposedly much more deadly "virus" and there will be no saying no to the vaccine. The pattern of "outbreaks" was either poison or statistical nonsense. What lessons can we learn and how can we protect our families? 1. Take no vaccines. 2. Do not take tests. 3. Trust no doctor. 4. Stay away from hospitals. 5. Stay away from airports and ports in general. 6. Believe nothing in the main stream media on subjects about public health ( and much else). 7. live in a place where you cannot be locked down and have a means of escape if anybody tries to lock you down. 9. Elect to public office only people who are openly and strongly anti-vaccine.
Jessica, I am sure the operation was military by design and in nature. But who started it and what was the purpose? What was so odd about it was the way the whole world just went along, Including sworn enemies. Even North Korea went along with it. It was the universality of the fraud that perplexes me. I never believed there was any 'pathogen'. I never believed in the testing. I certainly never believed in the vaccine. None of it, in fact. The whole thing felt like a totally obvious fake to me. I never wore a mask and if I was required to made sure it stayed under my nose. We were lucky and managed to get through the 2.5 years undamaged but many family and friends were less fortunate. Was it an AI driven mass media psychosis that every government saw the benefit of in terms of fleecing its population and feathering its own nest? Was it preparation for a digital gulag? What did all these governments know that we didn't? Why didn't one single government stand up against it?
"My guess is that the swabs were taken to a secret location and destroyed. Infection was decided randomly by a computer at a pre - decided rate appropriate for the current state of propaganda deemed appropriate."
- Yeah, could be like the Dominion voting machines. The Ai would know who to render 'positive' based upon cell phone data. However, looks like these was some biochemical underpinnings to the published sequences of 'the virus', picking up non-specific states of physiological & mental distress.
"Also, who made all those PCR machines and how did they get to every clinic and hospital in the world so quickly"
Nice summary once again. “The Chinese confirmed it, so it must be true!” Said no one ever other than CCP operatives, and the Covidiot army. Hey wait… While most folks paying attention now realize that any formerly forbidden narrative suddenly allowed to hit mainstream media in the “free” world is just part of the psyop, everyone should realize that literally anything released by the Chinese is self-serving propaganda.
This is the first man in the world who "died of novel coronavirus":
A: The patient is a 61-year-old male who was admitted to the hospital due to respiratory failure and severe pneumonia. He also suffers from abdominal tumors and chronic liver disease. The patient purchases goods at the South China Seafood Market in Wuhan all year round. After admission, he was given symptomatic support, anti-infection, ventilator-assisted breathing, continuous ECMO extracorporeal life support and other treatments, but his symptoms did not improve. His heart stopped beating on the evening of January 9, 2020, and he died after rescue. The results of pathogen detection indicated that the new coronavirus nucleic acid was positive. The cause of death was severe pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome (severe), septic shock, multiple organ failure, severe acid-base metabolic disorder, and liver cirrhosis. The direct cause of death was respiratory and circulatory failure.
A man with tumors, chronic liver disease, severe acid-basis metabolic disorder, and liver cirrhosis dies of respiratory and circulatory failure, septic shock, etc. after being ventilated, ECMO'd, etc.
Here in Australia one of the first big stories was of a “3 yo who died of Covid” in Sydney I believe … it was wall to wall coverage of sad parents and concerned doctors and experts … of course the unfortunate boy had a very rare deadly genetic condition and had been given a life expectancy of just 2 years, but that little detail was buried under the headlines … I showed this to someone and they didn’t understand the argument I was making, just thought I was being heartless.
It’s tough for all of us independents thinkers … sadly too few of us around these days, although hopefully there are a few more after the last few years.
I’m sure many of you know about the longest, largest, and highest quality controlled study of “sexual transmission of hiv”. I put that in quotes because they found zero cases of transmission after 282 “couple-years” of follow-up, suggesting pretty strongly that you cannot actually transmit it that way. Yes, you heard that right “zero”, despite 282 combined years of follow up.
If you only read their abstract, it sounds like some of the couples did pass it from one to the other, but this data came from the weaker “retrospective“ arm of the study, because a few of the nearly 200 couples had both partners already positive before the study began. However, in the vast majority of cases only one partner was “HIV positive“ and the other was “HIV negative“. They followed these “sero-discordant” couples in the prospective arm of the study, which is a much higher quality set of data, and found zero transmissions.
To find this information you have to look at the entire study, because the abstract does not help very much (see quotes below: one from the abstract and one from the body of the study).
This is a shocking and earthshaking result if you are involved in HIV and AIDS in any way at all. And yet this study remains completely ignored despite being published in the American Journal of Epidemiology!
Publishing these results took a lot of courage, and I keep waiting for it to be erased, retracted, etc. But apparently they don’t need to do that because it is in the realm of “cognitive dissonance“. However, our Covid experience has allowed many people to open their eyes a bit, and this kind of study starts to look more like common sense. It would be interesting if some retractions or efforts to erase it occurred. Fortunately, I have a paper photocopy in a file in my office that I have had since 1997 when the study was published.
I would like to point out here that the study was done before the highly inaccurate PCR test was developed to measure people’s “viral load“, and it is highly likely that at least some of these people had extremely high “viral loads”: Yet none of them “transmitted“ HIV to their partner, despite a combined 282 years of unprotected sex (sorry am I repeating myself? I guess I am … :-).
When I bring this up, I always ask people to look for a better study, and I am open to such information. However, to this date, no one has come forward. Also, even if a controlled study did find some cases where a partner tested positive, that does not mean it was given to them from another person. There are many other more likely explanations that have nothing to do with a spreading infection (several examples are listed below). I would also like to point out that the media regularly presents cases of “transmission” that are anecdotes, suffering from much worse biases and erroneous data points than a controlled study.
There is another similar study on IV drug use. That one is even worse if you believe in infectious HIV. It found that people who used clean needle programs exclusively were 10 times more likely to test positive on the “HIV tests”. Yes you read that right, exclusive users of clean needles were 10 times more likely to test positive. I will cite that study at the bottom as well, but spare you the details as my comment here is already getting a bit long 😇.
If you ever encounter this issue, you could just send them the first study on sexual transmission and perhaps even provide the quote where the authors report that there were zero transmissions in the prospective arm. Let them do with that what they will, but at least someone will have spoken up for the people who have fingers pointed at them, and who often carry a deep survivors guilt for “spreading HIV“. We can all fill in a little part of the tapestry.
I sometimes present this data when the topic arises if I sense people are open to listening, I often just say something very short such as: “the largest study ever done showed that HIV could not be transmitted sexually.“ if they are open minded, and curious, they may ask something like “well then how do you catch it?“. My second response may be: “it turns out that people test positive on those tests for unknown reasons at any time, not related to catching it from anyone else“.
Sometimes people get angry about this, no matter how calm I am. Sometimes they don’t get angry, but they might look a bit stunned and change the subject or simply excuse themselves. Sometimes people actually want to hear the whole meal - not just a sound bite. Regardless of their response, I feel better that I have expressed myself.
Below are the two quotes I mentioned previously. The first quote from the study abstract is based on the retrospective part where a very small number of couples were already both positive when the study began. Note that the risk they report is still exceedingly small, and you would need about 1000 acts of sexual intercourse to transmit HIV - on average - at least according to their statistical calculations. The second quote is from their discussion of the higher quality prospective arm, with its remarkable finding of zero transmissions.
The assumption that partners in the retrospective part were both positive at the start of the study because they had already “given it to each other” is extremely unlikely based on the higher quality prospective arm. It is more likely that both partners tested positive because they both had high levels of antibodies in their blood, resulting in what is termed a “false positive”. Positive tests can be caused by active autoimmune reactions, allergic reactions, acute inflammatory illnesses, exaggerated responses to vaccines, exaggerated reactions to injected drugs or medications, and many other conditions that could fill a page or two.
Without further ado, here are the two quotes
Quote #1 from the abstract:
“Male-to-female transmission was approximately eight-times more efficient than female-to-male transmission and male-to-female per contact infectivity was estimated to be 0.0009” (which translates to needing more than 1000 sexual contacts for male to female and 8000 for female to male, although both these numbers are highly suspect.)
Quote #2 from the body of the paper where they describe the results from the higher quality prospective arm of the study:
“We followed 175 HIV-discordant couples over time, for a total of approximately 282 couple years of follow up (table three)… We observed no seroconversions after entry into the study.” (Page 354).
References:
Padian NS, Shiboski SC, Glass SO, Vittinghoff E. Heterosexual transmission of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in northern California: results from a ten-year study. Am J Epidemiol. 1997 Aug 15;146(4):350-7. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009276. PMID: 9270414.
Here is the reference for the study on IV drug use, which was also published in 1997 in the American Journal of epidemiology.
High rates of HIV infection among injection drug users participating in needle exchange programs in Montreal: results of a cohort study - PubMed
Bruneau J, Lamothe F, Franco E, Lachance N, Désy M, Soto J, Vincelette J. High rates of HIV infection among injection drug users participating in needle exchange programs in Montreal: results of a cohort study. Am J Epidemiol. 1997 Dec 15;146(12):994-1002. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009240. PMID: 9420522.
Thank you for your uber informative post. I was one of the first AIDS doctors back in 1985 in Buffalo NY. The HIV test had just came out and I was testing the at risk clients who came to my clinic at Erie County Med Ctr. I did not dose AZT, so I am very glad I did not participate in Fauci's first attempt at genocide. The AIDS clinic was taken over by the Inf Disease faculty in 1987 after I successfully obtained funding/resources and educated the medical / legal /political community. I moved on to my other research projects.
Then, ironically, I was hired by Fauci in 2009 to run clinical trials on the H1N1 vaccines in pregnant women and children. In 2011, my followup data showed that multiple vaccinations lead to decreased immune response, especially in children. When informed, Fauci et al immediately fired me. I then filed a whistleblower report with Obama admin and senators, reporting this event and also that Fauci was making a chimeric hemorrhagic fever virus with CCP/PLA in Wuhan. It was all ignored, and I was harassed / threatened / blacklisted.
“Experts declared today …” has a lot to answer for these past several years. It’s a phrase that’s become ubiquitous across media, and far too many people just glaze over when they read it and assume that whatever words they read thereafter must be true.
I’m convinced more so now than ever that the vast majority of people who became “ill” in 2020 an 2021 with “Covid” were literally brainwashed into feeling the symptoms they had heard about and were worried about. I includes myself in that, we were simply entranced by stories of death and disease and assumed it would be only a matter of time before it struck.
In the early 70s, Mary Lou told everyone that Billy had cooties. And that they were highly contagious. Everybody shunned Billy and kept their distance. Despite these precautions, Sally and Jack were both diagnosed by Mary Lou as having cooties. All the other children believed her. I’m so glad we’ve progressed since kindergarten.
I was hoping you would just say a group of symptoms with a man made name likely inspired by fear more than anything. There are no scientific papers showing isolation, characterization, measurement, or photographs of a virus in nature. No proof of symptoms of one individual being transferred to another individual ever either.
We've addressed that question elsewhere, and make no apologies for dismantling internal inconsistencies in one part of the narrative, even though we don't believe in other averarching aspects of it.
I wrote this for my own articles but I am sure Jessica agrees with it.
Thanks Jonathan, I read the a brief article you linked, and I’ll go back to read the links within it. Sometimes it sounds like you & Jessica understands that “viruses” have not been demonstrated to exist as described, but other times it sounds like that is an intolerable position The response to pat fuller indicates you agree with what he said. I do believe it is superior to point out that the virus hypothesis is invalid for explaining disease, but it’s also important to critique other false narratives as you and Jessica have done.
We do understand that viruses are not what we have been "told and sold" that they are, and that transmission dynamics and the link between viruses and diseases is far from established.
But we also understand that there are different "entry points" for thinking about all of this.
No matter what one believes SARS-CoV-2 “is” - or viruses “are” - there was never any real evidence that the thing initially called 2019-nCoV was transmitting from human to human, as alleged.
One doesn't need to accept "No Such Thing as Viruses" to doubt what we were told in 2020.
https://www.activistpost.com/node-without-consent/
Good post, thanks. The only real, objective, thing about the whole disaster was the vaccine. Also, who made all those PCR machines and how did they get to every clinic and hospital in the world so quickly and who did the testing? Were an army of testers suddenly employed to do it? In Seoul, where we live, there were queues down the street and around the corner everyday for years. Results came through in two days, or less. How is that possible? My guess is that the swabs were taken to a secret location and destroyed. Infection was decided randomly by a computer at a pre - decided rate appropriate for the current state of propaganda deemed appropriate. I was very ( I do not use that word lightly) scared of the vaccine and stopped my family from taking it, and tried to dissuade everybody I knew also. I was also scared of the PCR test. I was forced to take it three times for air travel. I was well aware that the test could be used to force the vaccine on me. Where are all those PCR machines now? I don't think they ever existed. The next time they decide there is a pandemic it will be for a supposedly much more deadly "virus" and there will be no saying no to the vaccine. The pattern of "outbreaks" was either poison or statistical nonsense. What lessons can we learn and how can we protect our families? 1. Take no vaccines. 2. Do not take tests. 3. Trust no doctor. 4. Stay away from hospitals. 5. Stay away from airports and ports in general. 6. Believe nothing in the main stream media on subjects about public health ( and much else). 7. live in a place where you cannot be locked down and have a means of escape if anybody tries to lock you down. 9. Elect to public office only people who are openly and strongly anti-vaccine.
Keyword in your response: "army"
Jessica, I am sure the operation was military by design and in nature. But who started it and what was the purpose? What was so odd about it was the way the whole world just went along, Including sworn enemies. Even North Korea went along with it. It was the universality of the fraud that perplexes me. I never believed there was any 'pathogen'. I never believed in the testing. I certainly never believed in the vaccine. None of it, in fact. The whole thing felt like a totally obvious fake to me. I never wore a mask and if I was required to made sure it stayed under my nose. We were lucky and managed to get through the 2.5 years undamaged but many family and friends were less fortunate. Was it an AI driven mass media psychosis that every government saw the benefit of in terms of fleecing its population and feathering its own nest? Was it preparation for a digital gulag? What did all these governments know that we didn't? Why didn't one single government stand up against it?
https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/motive-for-pandemic-casualty-event
"My guess is that the swabs were taken to a secret location and destroyed. Infection was decided randomly by a computer at a pre - decided rate appropriate for the current state of propaganda deemed appropriate."
- Yeah, could be like the Dominion voting machines. The Ai would know who to render 'positive' based upon cell phone data. However, looks like these was some biochemical underpinnings to the published sequences of 'the virus', picking up non-specific states of physiological & mental distress.
"Also, who made all those PCR machines and how did they get to every clinic and hospital in the world so quickly"
- Human Genome Project
Nice summary once again. “The Chinese confirmed it, so it must be true!” Said no one ever other than CCP operatives, and the Covidiot army. Hey wait… While most folks paying attention now realize that any formerly forbidden narrative suddenly allowed to hit mainstream media in the “free” world is just part of the psyop, everyone should realize that literally anything released by the Chinese is self-serving propaganda.
I personally don't think Americans believed anything because of China.
It was the Lombardy/Bergamo Op that sealed the deal for Western Europe, U.S., etc.
Everyone loves Italians
The link from the NYT to the first report of a man who "died from the coronavirus" is no longer available (but is still available on archive.org).
http://wjw.wuhan.gov.cn/front/web/showDetail/2020011109036
This is the first man in the world who "died of novel coronavirus":
A: The patient is a 61-year-old male who was admitted to the hospital due to respiratory failure and severe pneumonia. He also suffers from abdominal tumors and chronic liver disease. The patient purchases goods at the South China Seafood Market in Wuhan all year round. After admission, he was given symptomatic support, anti-infection, ventilator-assisted breathing, continuous ECMO extracorporeal life support and other treatments, but his symptoms did not improve. His heart stopped beating on the evening of January 9, 2020, and he died after rescue. The results of pathogen detection indicated that the new coronavirus nucleic acid was positive. The cause of death was severe pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome (severe), septic shock, multiple organ failure, severe acid-base metabolic disorder, and liver cirrhosis. The direct cause of death was respiratory and circulatory failure.
A man with tumors, chronic liver disease, severe acid-basis metabolic disorder, and liver cirrhosis dies of respiratory and circulatory failure, septic shock, etc. after being ventilated, ECMO'd, etc.
Obviously it was the virus, right?
Here in Australia one of the first big stories was of a “3 yo who died of Covid” in Sydney I believe … it was wall to wall coverage of sad parents and concerned doctors and experts … of course the unfortunate boy had a very rare deadly genetic condition and had been given a life expectancy of just 2 years, but that little detail was buried under the headlines … I showed this to someone and they didn’t understand the argument I was making, just thought I was being heartless.
It's tough being an intelligent guy these days.
It’s tough for all of us independents thinkers … sadly too few of us around these days, although hopefully there are a few more after the last few years.
I’m sure many of you know about the longest, largest, and highest quality controlled study of “sexual transmission of hiv”. I put that in quotes because they found zero cases of transmission after 282 “couple-years” of follow-up, suggesting pretty strongly that you cannot actually transmit it that way. Yes, you heard that right “zero”, despite 282 combined years of follow up.
If you only read their abstract, it sounds like some of the couples did pass it from one to the other, but this data came from the weaker “retrospective“ arm of the study, because a few of the nearly 200 couples had both partners already positive before the study began. However, in the vast majority of cases only one partner was “HIV positive“ and the other was “HIV negative“. They followed these “sero-discordant” couples in the prospective arm of the study, which is a much higher quality set of data, and found zero transmissions.
To find this information you have to look at the entire study, because the abstract does not help very much (see quotes below: one from the abstract and one from the body of the study).
This is a shocking and earthshaking result if you are involved in HIV and AIDS in any way at all. And yet this study remains completely ignored despite being published in the American Journal of Epidemiology!
Publishing these results took a lot of courage, and I keep waiting for it to be erased, retracted, etc. But apparently they don’t need to do that because it is in the realm of “cognitive dissonance“. However, our Covid experience has allowed many people to open their eyes a bit, and this kind of study starts to look more like common sense. It would be interesting if some retractions or efforts to erase it occurred. Fortunately, I have a paper photocopy in a file in my office that I have had since 1997 when the study was published.
I would like to point out here that the study was done before the highly inaccurate PCR test was developed to measure people’s “viral load“, and it is highly likely that at least some of these people had extremely high “viral loads”: Yet none of them “transmitted“ HIV to their partner, despite a combined 282 years of unprotected sex (sorry am I repeating myself? I guess I am … :-).
When I bring this up, I always ask people to look for a better study, and I am open to such information. However, to this date, no one has come forward. Also, even if a controlled study did find some cases where a partner tested positive, that does not mean it was given to them from another person. There are many other more likely explanations that have nothing to do with a spreading infection (several examples are listed below). I would also like to point out that the media regularly presents cases of “transmission” that are anecdotes, suffering from much worse biases and erroneous data points than a controlled study.
There is another similar study on IV drug use. That one is even worse if you believe in infectious HIV. It found that people who used clean needle programs exclusively were 10 times more likely to test positive on the “HIV tests”. Yes you read that right, exclusive users of clean needles were 10 times more likely to test positive. I will cite that study at the bottom as well, but spare you the details as my comment here is already getting a bit long 😇.
If you ever encounter this issue, you could just send them the first study on sexual transmission and perhaps even provide the quote where the authors report that there were zero transmissions in the prospective arm. Let them do with that what they will, but at least someone will have spoken up for the people who have fingers pointed at them, and who often carry a deep survivors guilt for “spreading HIV“. We can all fill in a little part of the tapestry.
I sometimes present this data when the topic arises if I sense people are open to listening, I often just say something very short such as: “the largest study ever done showed that HIV could not be transmitted sexually.“ if they are open minded, and curious, they may ask something like “well then how do you catch it?“. My second response may be: “it turns out that people test positive on those tests for unknown reasons at any time, not related to catching it from anyone else“.
Sometimes people get angry about this, no matter how calm I am. Sometimes they don’t get angry, but they might look a bit stunned and change the subject or simply excuse themselves. Sometimes people actually want to hear the whole meal - not just a sound bite. Regardless of their response, I feel better that I have expressed myself.
Below are the two quotes I mentioned previously. The first quote from the study abstract is based on the retrospective part where a very small number of couples were already both positive when the study began. Note that the risk they report is still exceedingly small, and you would need about 1000 acts of sexual intercourse to transmit HIV - on average - at least according to their statistical calculations. The second quote is from their discussion of the higher quality prospective arm, with its remarkable finding of zero transmissions.
The assumption that partners in the retrospective part were both positive at the start of the study because they had already “given it to each other” is extremely unlikely based on the higher quality prospective arm. It is more likely that both partners tested positive because they both had high levels of antibodies in their blood, resulting in what is termed a “false positive”. Positive tests can be caused by active autoimmune reactions, allergic reactions, acute inflammatory illnesses, exaggerated responses to vaccines, exaggerated reactions to injected drugs or medications, and many other conditions that could fill a page or two.
Without further ado, here are the two quotes
Quote #1 from the abstract:
“Male-to-female transmission was approximately eight-times more efficient than female-to-male transmission and male-to-female per contact infectivity was estimated to be 0.0009” (which translates to needing more than 1000 sexual contacts for male to female and 8000 for female to male, although both these numbers are highly suspect.)
Quote #2 from the body of the paper where they describe the results from the higher quality prospective arm of the study:
“We followed 175 HIV-discordant couples over time, for a total of approximately 282 couple years of follow up (table three)… We observed no seroconversions after entry into the study.” (Page 354).
References:
Padian NS, Shiboski SC, Glass SO, Vittinghoff E. Heterosexual transmission of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in northern California: results from a ten-year study. Am J Epidemiol. 1997 Aug 15;146(4):350-7. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009276. PMID: 9270414.
Here is the reference for the study on IV drug use, which was also published in 1997 in the American Journal of epidemiology.
High rates of HIV infection among injection drug users participating in needle exchange programs in Montreal: results of a cohort study - PubMed
Bruneau J, Lamothe F, Franco E, Lachance N, Désy M, Soto J, Vincelette J. High rates of HIV infection among injection drug users participating in needle exchange programs in Montreal: results of a cohort study. Am J Epidemiol. 1997 Dec 15;146(12):994-1002. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009240. PMID: 9420522.
Matt Irwin MD,
Thank you for your uber informative post. I was one of the first AIDS doctors back in 1985 in Buffalo NY. The HIV test had just came out and I was testing the at risk clients who came to my clinic at Erie County Med Ctr. I did not dose AZT, so I am very glad I did not participate in Fauci's first attempt at genocide. The AIDS clinic was taken over by the Inf Disease faculty in 1987 after I successfully obtained funding/resources and educated the medical / legal /political community. I moved on to my other research projects.
Then, ironically, I was hired by Fauci in 2009 to run clinical trials on the H1N1 vaccines in pregnant women and children. In 2011, my followup data showed that multiple vaccinations lead to decreased immune response, especially in children. When informed, Fauci et al immediately fired me. I then filed a whistleblower report with Obama admin and senators, reporting this event and also that Fauci was making a chimeric hemorrhagic fever virus with CCP/PLA in Wuhan. It was all ignored, and I was harassed / threatened / blacklisted.
And then the covid scamdemic hit., 2019/2020
... sigh.
- Laura Kragie MD. biomedworks.substack.com
Laura, I'm putting the comment you made on the H1N1-related article I wrote here for reader reference:
https://open.substack.com/pub/woodhouse/p/setting-the-stage-for-flus-disappearing?r=jjay2&utm_campaign=comment-list-share-cta&utm_medium=web&comments=true&commentId=18001619
Wow. I've never heard someone so utterly demolish the whole HIV fantasy. Thank you.
Great post! I'll use it later to make a foia here in Norway.
“Experts declared today …” has a lot to answer for these past several years. It’s a phrase that’s become ubiquitous across media, and far too many people just glaze over when they read it and assume that whatever words they read thereafter must be true.
I’m convinced more so now than ever that the vast majority of people who became “ill” in 2020 an 2021 with “Covid” were literally brainwashed into feeling the symptoms they had heard about and were worried about. I includes myself in that, we were simply entranced by stories of death and disease and assumed it would be only a matter of time before it struck.
Footnote 1 https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/the-possibility-of-a-poisoning-event
Looking up the seminal work of hope-Simpsons until now we do not have a clear understanding of the spread of a viral respiratory disease.
See John Dee's series. https://jdee.substack.com/p/an-enigma-transmission-of-epidemic
In the early 70s, Mary Lou told everyone that Billy had cooties. And that they were highly contagious. Everybody shunned Billy and kept their distance. Despite these precautions, Sally and Jack were both diagnosed by Mary Lou as having cooties. All the other children believed her. I’m so glad we’ve progressed since kindergarten.
What is SARS COV2?
https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/views-on-the-things-called-viruses
https://open.substack.com/pub/sanityunleashed/p/disclaimer-for-all-my-articles-as
I was hoping you would just say a group of symptoms with a man made name likely inspired by fear more than anything. There are no scientific papers showing isolation, characterization, measurement, or photographs of a virus in nature. No proof of symptoms of one individual being transferred to another individual ever either.
That is what we say
Your followup substack:
https://sanityunleashed.substack.com/p/how-mass-testing-creates-the-illusion
Yes! Will add to bottom of post
The more fundamental question would be “was there ever any evidence for the existence of cov?” The answer is no.
We've addressed that question elsewhere, and make no apologies for dismantling internal inconsistencies in one part of the narrative, even though we don't believe in other averarching aspects of it.
I wrote this for my own articles but I am sure Jessica agrees with it.
https://sanityunleashed.substack.com/p/disclaimer-for-all-my-articles-as
Thanks Jonathan, I read the a brief article you linked, and I’ll go back to read the links within it. Sometimes it sounds like you & Jessica understands that “viruses” have not been demonstrated to exist as described, but other times it sounds like that is an intolerable position The response to pat fuller indicates you agree with what he said. I do believe it is superior to point out that the virus hypothesis is invalid for explaining disease, but it’s also important to critique other false narratives as you and Jessica have done.
We do understand that viruses are not what we have been "told and sold" that they are, and that transmission dynamics and the link between viruses and diseases is far from established.
But we also understand that there are different "entry points" for thinking about all of this.
No matter what one believes SARS-CoV-2 “is” - or viruses “are” - there was never any real evidence that the thing initially called 2019-nCoV was transmitting from human to human, as alleged.
One doesn't need to accept "No Such Thing as Viruses" to doubt what we were told in 2020.
NO did notstopcovidor transmissionwas notdesinged to